17 September, 2021

Blog

Mangala’s ‘Golden Moment’ & The UNP’s Electoral Extinction

By Dayan Jayatilleka

Dr. Dayan Jayatilleka

In his recent media briefing, the transcript of which is helpfully available on this website, former Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera makes at least two important points.

Firstly, that the 2015 UNHRC resolution was actually drafted by Sri Lanka and not just co-sponsored by it. On the contrary, apparently, it was the other states that co-sponsored Sri Lanka’s resolution at Sri Lanka’s invitation.

Secondly, that the 2015 resolution was one of the ‘golden moments’ of Sri Lankan foreign policy.   

Let the record show that he says the following:

“So, we said, give us a little more time until September where we will present our resolution for a national independent judicial mechanism and the Prime Minister along with a group of top-level experts drafted this resolution and then we invited the US Ambassador and UK High Commissioner to co-sponsor this resolution.

This whole idea that we sponsored a foreign resolution is an utterly misleading lie. We managed to get the powerful countries to back us and each and every word in that resolution was approved by President Sirisena…”

If we take him at his word, then the PM at the time, Mr. Ranil Wickremesinghe, and the foreign minister Mr. Samaraweera himself are fully responsible for the following words in Operative Paragraph 6 of the 2015 resolution:

“…notes with appreciation the proposal of the Government of Sri Lanka to establish a judicial mechanism with a special counsel to investigate allegations of violations and abuses of human rights and violations of international humanitarian law, as applicable… and also affirms in this regard the importance of participation in a Sri Lankan judicial mechanism, including the special counsel’s office, of Commonwealth and other foreign judges, defense lawyers and authorized prosecutors and investigators”. (My emphasis-DJ)

This is the very first time that Sri Lanka made a commitment to accept “the importance of participation in a Sri Lankan judicial mechanism, including the special counsel’s office, of Commonwealth and other foreign judges, defense lawyers and authorized prosecutors and investigators”.

Some ‘golden moment’, that.

Operative Paragraph 1 (OP1) of the 2015 Resolution, now disgracefully claimed as having been authored by the then PM of Sri Lanka, read:

“Takes note with appreciation of the oral update presented by the United Nations High Commissioner to the Human Rights Council at its twenty-seventh session, the report of the Office of the High Commissioner on promoting reconciliation and accountability in Sri Lanka and its investigation on Sri Lanka requested by the Human Rights Council in its resolution 25/1, including its findings and conclusions, and encourages the Government of Sri Lanka to implement the recommendations contained therein…” (my emphasis-DJ)

In March 2021, Michel Bachelet, helpfully described the OISL conclusions: The report of the OHCHR investigation on Sri Lanka (OISL), released in September 2015, found credible evidence that both Sri Lankan security forces and LTTE were responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity.”

Here are some of the findings of the OISL which OP1 of 2015 i.e., Mangala’s “golden moment”, “took note with appreciation”:

The sheer number of allegations, their gravity, recurrence and the similarities in their modus operandi, as well as the consistent pattern of conduct they indicate, all point to system crimes… these findings demonstrate that there are reasonable grounds to believe that gross violations of international human rights law, serious violations of international humanitarian law and international crimes were committed by all parties during the period under review.”

On the basis of the information obtained by the investigation team, there are reasonable grounds to believe the Sri Lankan security forces and paramilitary groups associated with them were implicated in unlawful killings carried out in a widespread manner against civilians and other protected persons.” -Report of the OHCHR Investigation on Sri Lanka (OISL) [My emphasis-DJ]

* If as Mr. Samaraweera alleges, President Sirisena approved every single word of the resolution, why then did he clearly state in interviews given to the New York Times and the BBC’s Sandeshaya within days of the passage of the Resolution that he opposes and shall not permit any participation by foreign judges?

* If the resolution was authored by the PM and Sri Lanka, how did it come to pass that Ambassador Ravinatha Aryasinghe was attempting to negotiate the text, line-by-line, and was overridden by the PM? Didn’t Foreign Minister Samaraweera inform the Sri Lankan PRUN-Geneva that this was a GoSL-authored resolution which should be piloted through together with those who were co-sponsoring and ‘fronting’ it, chiefly the UK?   

* Why did the Yahapalana government and indeed the UNP itself partially retrench from the Geneva 2015 resolution, with Mr. Samaraweera’s successor as foreign minister, UNP veteran Tilak Marapona walking back in his address to the UNHRC, the Government’s commitment to implementation on the grounds that the Resolution’s commitments were not within the parameters of the Sri Lankan Constitution?

Mr. Samaraweera states that:

“…Sri Lanka got the friendship and the support of the whole world. In fact, when our joint resolution was presented in Geneva in September, not one country opposed it. Now this time when an investigation was initiated in Geneva, Pakistan and China got up and opposed that. However, all power blocs supported us in 2015. We had the support of the USA, the European Union, the UK, Japan, India and most of all China and Russia. Forgive me for saying so but I believe this was one of the golden moments in the history of foreign policy in this country. Whatever anyone says, I will challenge them anywhere to argue that this was actually a golden moment where we stuck to our words carrying out a balanced foreign policy which all countries appreciated.”

* There was no question of any country opposing the 2015 resolution when Sri Lanka itself co-sponsored it, or as Mr. Samaraweera says, was its author! 

* The question is: why didn’t India, an ally of the Yahapalanaya Government, and Mr. Samaraweera’s ‘sister’ Sushma Swaraj, its Foreign Minister, not sign the 2015 Resolution as a co-sponsor?   Was it not because it went beyond the boundaries that India thought prudent and set a dangerous precedent of external intrusion?

* Why didn’t a single country from the Global South (as represented in the NAM and G-77) co-sponsor it? Where did Ranil Wickremesinghe and Mangala Samaraweera think they/we were living? The EU?

Every time the UNP fared disastrously at elections, colossal foreign policy blunders had fed into the mix. Mr. Samaraweera will doubtless designate them “golden moments”.

Golden Moment I: The Sinhala nationalist-populist wave of 1956 had as a propellent, the appellation of “Bandung Booruwa” stuck to UNP PM Sir John Kotelawala for his anti-India, anti-China behavior as a boorish western proxy, at the historic Afro-Asian Bandung Conference of 1955. Unsurprisingly, his international affairs advisor at the time was Esmond Wickremesinghe, the father of former PM Ranil Wickremesinghe, the alleged author of the 2015 Geneva resolution.

Golden Moment 2: The 1970 wave that swept the UNP of 1965-1970 out of office, also had as an ingredient, nationalist indignation over the Vietnam war and the UNP government’s perceived tepidness and lack of firm solidarity with the Buddhist people of Vietnam being bombed by the US.

Golden Moment 3: The Jayewardene UNP Government’s mismanagement of the ethnic issue resulted in the Indian airdrop, the Indo-Lanka accord and the entry of the IPKF, all of which triggered a huge nationalist wave which almost consumed the UNP and the democratic system in a fiery finale, if not for the patriotic intervention and course-correction by Ranasinghe Premadasa (whose Presidency, Mangala Samaraweera, a convinced federalist even at the time, campaigned heavily against).

Golden Moment 4: Ranil Wickremesinghe’s CFA with Prabhakaran, facilitated by Norway, going way beyond the parameters that SL’s most outstanding Foreign Minister Lakshman Kadirgamar prescribed (he attacked the CFA on grounds of sovereignty, in Parliament and the Sunday Times), contributed mightily not only to his ouster but to the UNP’s defeat in 2004 (Parliament) and 2005 (Presidency).

Golden Moment 5: The Ranil-Mangala authorship of the self-incriminatory 2015 Geneva resolution, with its “foreign judges” terminology, added to the Sinhala nationalist wave that utterly swamped the UNP in 2020. Mangala’s assertion in the middle of Sajith’s presidential campaign that the UNP will sign the MCC, hurt the latter’s campaign and helped Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s, enhancing his appeal.   

Golden Moment 5 of (Geneva) 2015 turned out to be the one that hastened the final moment of the UNP in Parliament after seven decades. Ex-President Sirisena and the SLFP, having backed away from that Golden Moment, actually survived.

A democratic opposition exists today instead of a one-party state, because Sajith Premadasa finally formed his own party instead of inhabiting the UNP wrecked and submerged in toxicity by Ranil Wickremesinghe and Mangala Samaraweera. 

With “golden moments” like Ranil’s and Mangala’s in 2015, the majoritarian-ultranationalist autocrats don’t need friends and allies.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 20
    5

    Dr. Dayan,
    This is what both Sri Lanka’s UNP and SLFP or (right and left) play double game for seven decades. It is not something new to us. You are an opportunistic move around with both to play your fundamentalist game. The truth is both SLFP (Richest of Sri Lanka) and UNP(Richest of Sri Lanka) are responsible for the bloodshed in this soil for the past decades and it will not stop for another century until the country is replaced with Chinese or Indians.

    • 17
      2

      Dayan, on an independent assessment, I would say that co-sponsoring of resolution in 2015 is a brilliant move. It is based on agree but dilly dally. It resulted in lifting of GSP and restriction of trade with EU. It also gave time and space for the government to honour its pledge without any pressure. Government was able to take international community for a ride and also hoodwink Tamils for five years, without doing anything tangible regarding accountability and reconciliation. I warned at that time that this situation of international community turning a blind eye will not last long and the stick will be shown soon especially if there is change of government. This has now come true and present government is taking the the beating. Again time has been given to reform, and if it is not forthcoming, next resolution will be harsh, and may be co-sponsored by India and western nations.

      • 7
        0

        “huge nationalist wave which almost consumed the UNP and the democratic system in a fiery finale, if not for the patriotic intervention and course-correction by Ranasinghe Premadasa “
        What a nice way of describing the way Premadasa supplied weapons to the terrorist LTTE to use against the IPKF and 600 innocent policemen.
        This is DJ sycophancy at its worst.
        Perhaps he ought to have mentioned that people lit fireworks to show their sorrow at Preme’s demise.

    • 2
      9

      Certainly no replacement.
      SL-China partnership is better for both and prevents Indian colonization.
      China has a very effective way to manage dissent which SL can use successfully. We see that in action in Singapore. Indians in Singapore do not make demands. Do they?

      • 2
        1

        Gatam,
        “Indians in Singapore do not make demands. Do they?”
        Simple, Gatam. The Indians in Singapore are immigrants, like the Chinese. They don’t need to make demands because they are treated equally. Tamil is a national language and is on Singaporean currency. Even Mandarin is not on the currency.

  • 29
    4

    Dayan,

    Under the UNP regime Jaffna library was burnt by the State machinery. SLFP blamed UNP for burning it. But SLFP was in power several years (Srimavo, Chandrika, Mahinda) after the incident but they never bothered to punish the criminals. UNP blamed Gota and Mahinda for robbing the country. Later UNP came to power. No one was brought under Justice. Similarly, Bond scam happened and it was blamed on Ranil but nothing happened to Ranil. All this drama is by the richest powerful people including Dayan.

    • 2
      4

      You forgot the bombing of the AirCeylon passenger plane in 1978. Looking at a problem out of context is misleading. Karma has a way of punishing you.

      • 1
        2

        What an idiotic stupid comment in 1978 there was no LTTE and if there were any guerrilla fighters , they would have not even numbered 10 the most and they hardly had any hardware to bomb or burn a passenger plane. The most they did was take in accurate pot shots at Sinhalese policemen working in the north. We really do not know who was behind this bombing . Always the blame like now is on the Tamils. Even is they had done it, it is not excuse for the state to send its Sinhalese armed forces, Police and other southern hooligans and rowdies to go an a rampage in Jaffna, under the supervision of many senior UNP ministers and burn what is the oldest and one of the biggest libraries in Asia, with many ancient prehistoric manuscripts down to the ground and destroy everything. This was a deliberate cultural war crimes, that was deliberately done just like many other acts now, to erase the ancient history of the island’s Tamils , as this library had many ancient manuscripts, that proved the Tamils ownership to the North and East of the island and that their history in the island was far older than the Sinhalese. You are nasty piece of racist rejoicing in this and giving lame excuses to this cultural war crime, as suspect you are a UNP supporter. A Sinhalese or some southern opportunistic Muslim, full of anti Tamil venom.

        • 1
          1

          Who said LTTE stupid? There were other Tamil groups then. They are also no more today.

  • 4
    7

    Golden moments

    pray tell us please how the SJB would handle this situation. There is mongolas golden shower and gotas total rejection.. where does the ali mantharakaraya stand and how is he going to handle it. inquiring minds want to know?

  • 17
    1

    MR.DAYAN JAYATIILEKA,
    you should first remember your golden moment before trying to find the golden moment of MANGALA.
    Golden moment one-accepted 13th amendment and became a minister of north-east provincial council
    Golden moment two-worked hand to hand with MAHINDA when he was president.
    Golden moment three-dumped MAHINDA and joined SRISENA and got the plumb position of high commissioner of RUSSIA.
    golden moment four-accepted to work as advisor under SAJIH PREMADASA.

    • 13
      1

      Dear Paragon, DJ seems to be quite the opportunist!

      RW and Mangala Samaraweera offering up accountability on behalf of GoSL was indeed a golden moment for this country which never ever before did support or offer up accountability on its own volition.

      Impunity for even the gravest crimes of the state was always the game until that golden moment. The game of impunity has fully resumed.

  • 2
    7

    Mangal and UNP got wiped out because of two things. 1). co-sponsoring a UNHRC resolution. 2). paying compensation to LTTE war widows.

    Both are very unpopular in SL. Should never have attempted. That is why Rajapaksas are in power.

  • 7
    1

    As a poor third world country with systemic discrimination, injustice and wholly unfair practices at institutional level with rampant corruption, it is great that distinguished former judges of say, African and Asian countries sat on investigations into crimes committed during the civil war which ended in 2009. In that context, the Sri Lankan judicial system is utterly unreliable as a protector of human rights of ordinary citizens of the country. Without submitting to geopolitical agendas of regional or global powers (who blatantly practice double standards) SL should allow outsiders to closely investigate and make firm binding judgments on its internal affairs. There is no other way, as the Easter bombing tragedy and its lack of declared sponsors aptly demonstrates.

  • 3
    2

    Dayan,
    Agree with you on most criticism against the Golden Moment. I am convinced that the position taken to accept that, The Allegations (whether it was true, false or animus towards the security forces and Sri Lanka) to enable a procedure to Assess, Inquire and follow a Judicial process in SL nationally was indeed commendable – This would have built trust internationally and convinced UNHRC that the government was accountable and the matter brought to a closure to ensure the future prosperity and economic emancipation of Sri Lanka, None has attempted nor been able to do. Well done on that measure. They however, did not carry the majority of SL people along with them, That causing annihilations in the Hustings. Maru Sira may well have been an joint opposition agent for all the comedies that the Yahapalanaya government encountered in the 5 years

  • 1
    2

    So did Mangala achieve accountability, reconciliation, political solutions?

    None!

    I’m sure even he didn’t believe these can ever be achieved!

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.