18 November, 2018

Blog

Memory, Memorials & MR’s Moral Compass

By Sarath de Alwis

Sarath De Alwis

Lest we forget, the presidency of  Mahinda Rajapaksa was an exceptional display of state sovereignty. The hand that held sovereignty decided who lived, who died, who vanished and who was reprieved by the benevolence of the supreme law giver.

There is an African proverb coined to describe the fate of those who suffered the wrath of the tribal chief. ‘He left his foot print on stone and he passed on’. Lasantha left his foot print on stone and passed on. Keith Noyahr stepped on the stone but slipped before his foot print took hold.

“I don’t remember Karu Jayasuriya calling me.”

I asked them what was wrong if the man was released?”

“If as they say, the call was at twenty minutes past ten, it shows that I don’t go to bed at ten!”

Mahinda Rajapaksa provided these pleasantries and quips to the press after his interview with the CID officers. It was a choregraphed ‘walkabout’ in the ample compound of the official residence he occupies as a former head of state. He faced the cameras surrounded by a battalion of bum-kissers ready to break in to wild cheer at every bit of bombast that emanated from the great man.

Oxford Historian Timothy Garton Ash once observed that just as an Adult without a memory is a child, a nation that collectively contribute to a loss of memory is a childish nation. So let us not go there.

What, indeed was wrong about reprieving a man after beating and maiming him to pulp? There is nothing wrong about setting a man free after abduction. It is pure evil. Bodhisattva Rajapaksa is oblivious to the thin line that separates wrong from evil.

This essay is about the good and the evil of Mahinda Rajapakse.

Exhuming   history is not a feasible proposition with Mahinda Rajapaksa or Gotabaya Rajapaksa the principal enforcer under his presidency.

The absurd drama staged after the putative probe by CID investigators in to MR’s knowledge or the lack of it on the “Affaire Noyahr’ is abundant proof of the inexhaustible supply of the chummy, chameleonlike charisma of our war winning president.

He is incredibly resilient, intimidatingly provocative and immensely crafty. The English language has a word for such formidable fortitude. He is a ‘badass’ in the true sense of the word. That ‘Badass’ has an equally endearing nuance in our colloquial Sinhala is pure coincidence.

In the fortnight since the CID interview we have been treated to a good dose of MR’s matchless mastery of political theatre. He faced the cameras surrounded by a battalion of bum-kissers ready to break in to wild cheer at every bit of bombast that emanated from the great man.

The press permitted in to the event, measured up to the task by framing questions that reflects the puzzling spirit of our post-civil war political discourse.

‘Do you think it is proper for them to question a personage such as you, you, who has done so much?

Mahinda Rajapakse responded with aggravated indignation. ‘This is politically motivated harassment. They think it will not happen to them’.

‘Did you receive such a call from Karu Jayasuriya?

He could not recall a late-night  telephone call from Karu Jayasuriya on that bleak night when Keith Noyahr went missing.

The CID decision to question him was mischievous mudslinging and an attempt to link brother Gotabaya to the incident. It is nothing but a revengeful rollick of a failed and failing regime.

These responses of the former president reveal the monster lurking in his Sinhala Buddhist Patriotic breast.

He asks in chillingly nonchalance “I asked them what was wrong if the man was set free?”

This simple straightforward rhetoric of Mahinda Rajapaksa unclothes the anatomy of the liberator who eliminated the barbarity of the terrorists and delivered our nation in to a blissful repose of nothingness under the Rajapaksa family oligarchy.

Let us not underestimate badass Mahinda, the Sinhala Buddhist Patriot President. He holds the puppet strings of a huge swathe of Sinhala Buddhist Public opinion that is nearly half or slightly more. This huge support base holds him not in admiration but in pure unadulterated veneration.

He created, master minded the concept of Heroic Humanitarian slaying and coined the term ‘Ranaviru’ that has intimidated peace time political opponents in to a state of exasperating and excruciatingly painful impotence.

When Mahinda says he cannot remember, it means that he as the redeemer of the nation at the lagoon at Mulawaikkal does not wish to either talk about it or to be challenged on his credentials as the man who ended the war.

Memory politics is not for Mahinda Rajapaksa. This writer makes this assertion with haunting humility and deep despair. I know may people who would gladly endorse what Mahinda says or does without batting an eyelid. Most of them are highly educated professionals who have mastered their respective disciplines.

We are a people among whom are thousands that mourn the deaths and disappearances of their loved ones. We have unmarked graves. But we dare not mourn overtly for their deaths or search for their graves. That would be unpatriotic.

Mullivaikal is the village that turned out to be the decisive battle field. It was at Mullivaikal that the 26-year-old civil war came to an end. In a shallow inland lake nearby the victorious Mahinda Rajapaksa the Sinhala patriots from the Ruhunu heartland built a monument to mark the triumph of Mullivaikal. It is a 30 feet tall bronze soldier that springs out of the ripple less silent water. Four granite Lions guard the base of the monument that is dedicated to the memory of ‘Ranaviru’ war heroes who gave lives to defeat the LTTE.

The bronze soldier holds an assault rifle in his right hand while his left hand holds our national flag with its sword bearing lion deceptively distinct. The assault rifle in the right hand of the bronze soldier has a dove perched on it.

That little bronze dove while observing the silence of its metallic composition, seems to be quietly and resolutely cooing a message to the wider world. Perhaps it is that message of foreboding that prompted Keith Noyahr to think twice before appearing in person before the Magistrates court in Mount Lavinia.

There is nothing wrong with war memorials not even in the case of a civil war fought against an enemy within that sought to undermine the state or to split it in half.  Civilized nation states have built war memorials. The Russians built the ‘Motherland Calls’ statue to commemorate the Battle of Stalingrad.

The Indians have a splendid war memorial – the Tawang War Memorial on the snowcapped peaks of Tawang in Arunachala Pradesh for the martyrs of the 1962 Sino-Indian War.

War memorials are built for a purpose. They are built by civilized nations after traumatic conflicts that demanded great human sacrifices.

What is the essential function of a war memorial? It helps the healing process. It must help the survivors of both sides of the conflict to make sense of the past and make peace with the past. A war memorial should invoke positive public discussion.

Mahinda’s Bronze Soldier with his assault rifle with a Pidgeon perched on it has a message-‘You lost, we won.’

Today, we are intimidated by the Rajapakse monolith that took firm root after the military triumph. We dare not challenge the triumphalist notion of self-righteous aggrandizement of the state that crushed terrorism.

In his percipient study of the use and abuse of political memory ‘In Praise of Forgetting: Historical Memory and its ironies David Rieff points out that when wars end with the overwhelming defeat of one side “victoryconfers the power unilaterally to shape the collective memory of the conflict.”

What Mahinda Rajapaksa’s war memorial does is to demand from the Tamils that they swallow their grief and any bitterness to grasp an uncertain harmony.

This writer is a Sinhalese and also a Buddhist. No doubt these remarks will prompt some patriots to suggest amendments to the column in my birth certificate where details of my father and my mother are spelt out. That indeed is a small price to pay in this attempt to make an honest map that depicts the correct contours of our collective political memory.

Time and time again in history, a certain personality type assume power after cataclysmic conflicts. They are charismatic, charming, calculating and cruel. They are devoid of empathy and full of grandiosity, thirst for power and totally indifferent to conventional rules and norms of conduct.

They are tyrants that people learn to follow willingly. Mahinda Rajapakse is such a man- a malignant narcist.  It seems we have not seen the end of his tyranny.

Watching the stupid, inept bungling of the successor regime that has only marginally resuscitated our democracy, we seem to have forgotten the blackmail, the outright threats, and the manipulations we were subjected to in the post-civil war five years, when Mahinda Rajapaksa exercised his leverage though his immediate and extended family.

The video recording of the former President fielding journalists’ questions after his encounter with the CID investigators is now available in the internet.

Quite nonchalantly, MR makes the counter argument. All right, what if he did make the call. The man was released. What is wrong with that?

That is what is frightening about Mahinda Rajapaksa who may yet make a comeback. He does not find the abduction and assault of the journalist either shocking or reprehensible.

Mahinda Rajapaksa presided over an efficient government. It delivered results. The declared objectives of the powers that be were implemented by a state mechanism that ceased to think but acted reflectively. If a practice of intimidation became a daily routine, surely the nation that reconciled itself to such routine procedure cannot suddenly wake up and cry foul.

Mahinda will be remembered in history. He rewrote history and the constitution.

We created Mahinda Rajapaksa. Reeling under the pressure of unimaginable terror we wanted decisive action. We wanted a leader who took swift action against a mad terrorist as against other leaders who were too soft. So, we went about creating our own evil to counter the evil that threatened us. So, defeating Prabhakaran’s armed terrorist evil we ended up with the coercive political evil of the Rajapaksa regime.

Mahinda was not pretending when he claimed not remembering the call from Karu Jayasuriya. He was just doing what he does very well. He was constructing a new history to replace memory.

Under the Mahinda presidency the state was sovereign. Not the people. That sovereign power determined who lived, who dies and who got abducted and maimed. The true lesson of Mahinda Rajapaksa’s presidency was the impotence of reason, contempt for the truth and the impudence of assuming that history was theirs to make or unmake.

The historical animosity between Poland and Russia was insurmountable through centuries. The Poles had a bitter joke. Who does a Pole kill first? A German or a Russian? A German of course! Duty before pleasure.

In the year 2010, the Russian parliament finally acknowledged that Stalinist Russia and not Nazi Germany was guilty of the mass murder of twenty-two thousand Polish officers in the Katyn forest in western Russia IN 1940. The Poles have forgotten the old joke.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 3
    5

    “So, defeating Prabhakaran’s armed terrorist evil we ended up with the coercive political evil of the Rajapaksa regime.”
    Being unhappy with evil Rajapakse regime, you guys got rid of that regime and brought the ‘Royal Gang’ that masterminded the biggest bank robbery in the history of Sri Lanka. Which one is better evil? One who brought peace to all the communities or the Bank Robbers who are ruining the economy?

  • 7
    0

    As usual, a thoughtful and well-written piece. Unfortunately, it is our lot as humans to believe what we want to believe despite all the contradictory evidence. In America, we have a turbo-charged MR who continues to lie through his teeth but is supported by tens of millions of Christians and family values types, who are addicted to Fox News despite the fact that any intelligent person would know that this TV channel set up by an Australian pornographer treats them like fools. In Sri Lanka, the equivalent of the fundamentalist Christians are the blue collar Buddhists and sections of the clergy. In a country drowning in corruption, have these monks led demonstrations asking for the removal of this cancer that is harming all in our beloved country? Instead, there is a stupid issue like removing a Buddha statue from the office of the mayoress and time spent on denials!! When the history of post-independence Sri Lanka is written by a disinterested historian, a section of the nationalistic, uneducated, UnBuddhist clergy would be rightly blamed for much that went wrong after independence. Clergy (pedophile Catholic priests) (ISIS theologians) (Hindus killing Dalits and Muslims) and (Theravada clergy in Myanmar and Sri Lanka) in addition to being useless parasites and have toxic in societies where they have played an important part.

  • 3
    0

    Let us assume that instead of a male journalist being abducted, assaulted and later released on his orders, a female journalist was abducted, raped and later released on his orders.
    If he was suspected of having given the order to release the victim and later questioned about it, his response would still be the same.
    “I asked them what was wrong if the woman was released?”
    His knowledge about whom to contact regarding this matter fades into irrelevancy!

  • 4
    0

    MR’s Moral Compass always points at himself. Surely this not the way compass work.

  • 5
    0

    We have hope that our beloved Sri Lanka will soon blossom to her full potential with alluring charm, only with citizens of the caliber of Sarath de Alwis.

    P.Rajeswaran

    • 1
      0

      @ P Rajeswaran
      Haven’t you noticed until now only the Para Minorities are hoping and hoping for a better future for Srilanka Apehh Aanduwe in the right direction?
      The majority are only praying how they can Swindle the state.
      You should have known by now.
      The truth is the Majority’s are real Suckers.

  • 0
    1

    Poles have just forgot a joke……..This guy forgot about 60,000 youth who were burnt (sometimes alive) or drowned between 1987-90…… Did he ever ask the question from the bloke (who lived in the same Batalanda compound where both lay and robed youth were tortured) whether that bloke heard or remembered the agonising cries? That bloke today lives with the power obtained through robbed money from the Central Bank! Yet that is not an issue for these fake intellectuals at all. Their issue is with the patriotism of the people. Their rejoicing of the defeat of separatist terrorism.

    • 1
      1

      Helass

      Have you ever askd yourself a question how did we end up having to deal with so many issues since the advent of the public racist Anagarika Homeless Dharmapala and his numerous racist vanguards including the weeping widow, her husband, lumpen Pancha Maha Balavegaya, the “educated” unwise ones, ………………….. many riots against the minorities, wars, state terrorism from 1971 to 2015, destruction of properties, libraries, …………………………. ?

      Before you start expressing/type your racist views please sit down and contemplate what the noisy racists such as yourself and soma been doing to poison the minds of people and destroy “others” and make profit for yourself.

      How much did you profit directly or indirectly from all riots since 1958 to date and from the wars between 5th April 1971 and 2015?

      • 0
        0

        Gon veddo,

        Who burned the libraries? Who presided over the biggest riots? They were the fathers, uncles grand fathers and grand uncles of present day fake yahapalanistas…….Their sons are vying for the next presidency under the patronage of gon veddas and fake intellectuals……

  • 2
    0

    For people who live in U.S.A this story should sound very familiar as what Trump is involved right now.He keeps lying , trying to distort facts, threaten people who are doing their job irrespective of party lines, accusing others as sinners, trying to bribe victims to shut them up, financial irregularities, surrounded by goons and other criminals like Cohen and Manafort, getting help from criminals out side of U.S, hacking election outcome …..etc…..etc. MR is a well known conman turned politician like Trump who exploited the prevailing situation to get into power and then abuse with no remorse or regret.They do change personalities according to situation. This is a guy who stole Tsunami funds, abused all govt agencies including judiciary, openly threatened who opposed, bribed politicians, kicked out CJ, put SF behind bars and claimed zero casualty.Go figure.The difference is Trump only had his children involved but Rajapaksa had the whole clan (hundreds with any one and every one with that name) involved.

    • 0
      0

      Chiv
      Can you now comment on this please:
      https://youtu.be/8-4aDbeSgzA

      Soma

  • 0
    0

    It is said the navigational errors led Columbus to Americas and then…………. But he did return home!
    The Mahinda Moral Compass led us to this quicksand pit. Will we ever get out of this?

  • 1
    1

    Sarath De Alwis proving to the world again and again that he is the best columinst here out of all others. Second comes (closely) Van der poorten. Third Harees and Lateef (a tie). Last (and least) is Rathna J Hoole.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.