22 September, 2018

Blog

Sri Lanka’s Tragedy: Billions Wasted On Extravaganza & White Elephants! 

By Mohamed Harees –

Lukman Harees

Democratic elections alone do not remedy the crisis of confidence in government. Moreover, there is no viable justification for a democratic system in which public participation is limited to voting. ~ Beth Simone Noveck

What is happening around in political circles seems disastrous to Sri Lanka’s well-being and progress. With unbridled public Tamashas, corruption deals and extravaganzas around, causing severe drain on the tax payers’ money  without any consideration for public good or morality, Sri Lanka appears to be sliding down towards a point of no return. Public feelings and views about their representatives are not charitable to say the least of social media is anything to go by; however not much public activism is visible to stem the rot.

The previous government was accused of  many wrongs- unwanted airport, harbour, stadium etc mortgaging the country on a deadly debt trap, virtually making it a  client state of China! There were many Tamashas then, which were common place and took place without any fear or sanctions.  However, despite a change of government, these public money wasting antics continue regardless  at all levels in many forms – super expensive vehicles, extravagant overseas travel, unwanted office spaces, an oversized Cabinet/overextended political structures ,an unproductive public administration and even the craze to purchase ultra-comfortable furniture items and toilet modernization, when the average Citizen Silva and his family are forced to live below the poverty line and follow extreme austerity measures. Even the PET scan machine for the Cancer hospital was funded by public contributions. To add insult to injury, it has been height of haughtiness that even some Councillors have lost track of who they are- by asking the staff to ‘Sir’ them or asking the schools in their area to hang their photographs or even racially abusing a Muslim constituent as it happened recently for example. This make us wonder whether Sri Lanka is losing the plot and time has come to rethink of the rationale behind the very public democratic institutions which we have created to take it forward. The country is crying out for an Imran Khan or a Mahathir (not pseudo Yahapalanists) to kick-start the process of driving some sense into the system of governance which is corrupt to the core and regularly abused for reasons of political expediency. 

Whether Parliament, provincial councils or local government bodies, the system is today reeked of corruption, mismanagement and lack of efficiency and focus, bureaucratic red tape and uncertainty over who is responsible for what — a dispute between the central government and the provincial councils with regard to devolved or un-devolved powers. The unbelievable disclosures for example about the Western Provincial Council administration allegedly blowing a whopping sum to purchase super luxury chairs at the rate of Rs. 650,000 each (Well! The CM corrected the figure; it was 640,000!) would have sent shocking waves across the nation while the Colombo Mayor allocated a crazy amount of money to modernize the bathroom in her official residence. When public conveniences and public amenities within the city were in extremely unhygienic conditions and when more than one half of Colombo’s population are in slums and shanties, a waste of taxpayer’s money for such purposes is a crime as every right-thinking person would agree. In 2009, The Council has, reportedly allocated Rs. 30 mn for a mega junket a tour of China. If this is the situation in Colombo, the capital city, it is needless to talk of other provinces. 

It was in February this year that local government elections were concluded and councillors were elected in unwieldy numbers adding yet an unbearable burden on the State coffers, raising vital questions about the wisdom behind the new system of election. Then again, a further round of elections is coming soon to elect councillors to another public representative body below Parliament- the Provincial Council (PC) – described as a white elephant by opponents of the system from the very inception. Many an academic has expressed the view that the PC system has not served the purpose for which it was established, for a number of reasons. They were initially intended to devolve power to the North and East, but ironically, the system was extended to the South as well. The Provincial Councils, which the people never asked for, have nevertheless become part and parcel of the country’s Constitution today. It is pertinent to talk of PCs in more length as the PC elections are drawing near to be conducted based on a new system of election adding more burden. 

As S L Gunasekera once said, ‘The 13th Amendment to the Constitution (forced down our throats by the Indian Government] was an unmitigated disaster which resulted in the creation of `White Elephants’ called `Provincial Councils’ and a proliferation of political functionaries in the form of Provincial Ministers, Members of Provincial Councils and their hangers on’ which drained the public purse of colossal amounts of funds which ought to have been used for the benefit of the People and not for the benefit of such functionaries’.

 The whole PC system in addition to the  legislature and the extended LG assemblies have lost most credibility and Public feel that only politicians are  benefitting from the system, enjoying luxury perks and privileges while the whole exercise being a drain on public resources. Recent editorial in the ‘Island’ screamed; ‘creation of this monster that has only benefitted the political class with very little evidence of the devolution that was the raison d’etre for setting them up to be seen. Instead we have seen the multiplication of elected, paid political offices, replete with lavish perquisites, providing a new avenue for politicians to do very nicely for themselves and also aspire for Parliament as the next step up the ladder. The Editorial ended thus; ‘The politicians burdened the country in February with twice as many local councilors as we did before; at what cost and to what purpose? Now the debate is whether the PC elections will be under the new law or the old one. The people do not care just as much as they don’t care whether we have PCs or not’. 

According to our Constitution there are specific responsibilities and duties allocated to Municipal Councillors, Provincial Councillors and Pradaysheeya Sabha Members. The Councillors from the day they are appointed, however wait for the monies from the central government to start spending it. Most of it is misappropriated. All that the PC system has achieved is to further politicise our society and give to political parties and their ‘leaders’ more opportunities of advancing the fortunes of their otherwise unemployable kith and kin, supporters, hangers on, sycophants at the expense of the long suffering public. 

Thus, as SL Gunasekera stated in an article in December 2012, ‘however self evident that neither the present Government nor any other would have the political will to do so because the abolition of Provincial Councils will deny to any government [and even parties in opposition], vast vistas of opportunity to grant political patronage to all kinds of good for nothing sycophants so loved by politicians of all hues’. The situation is no different now if not worse off.

CDN Editorial of 24th  June 2013, also effectively underlined the futility of the PC system; ‘Provincial Councils have been created artificially, superfluously and insidiously not to accommodate more work, but to satisfy king sized egos of people that thought they should decide this country’s destinies from overseas…. There is no clamour for Provincial Councils after all among the Tamil people of any region and they do know that the government agents that were part of the existing structure of administration before Provincial Councils were superimposed on the existing administrative mechanism can do a very good job of serving as a conduit between them and the relevant agencies of state’. 

In the Post War era, when Sri Lanka has been crying out for an overhaul of the entire ,’so called’  ‘democratic’ process and  ‘good’ governance, unfortunately despite change of governments, nothing significant has happened in this regard.  The hopes of the millions remain specially the youth unreachable with ever widening inequality levels in society, and jobs for better quality of life; access to education, health, environment for happiness and peace being beyond ordinary man’s reach while the corrupt political class collects the fruits of progress and public debt soars to sky limits.  As things presently stand, there are no visible signs in the horizon of any political will to abolish PCs or reform or revamp any present political administrative systems. PCs at best will remain necessary evils. It is therefore  vital to promote more public activism to ensure that  regulatory mechanisms prescribed in law  work as they should and also take necessary measures to punish those administrators who fall out of line. Imran Khan and Mahathir type drastic measures are necessary and more human rights activists and champions are called for to keep the government and its’ agencies on their toes and hold them to account. 

When referring to democracy, as author Andréas Schedler says: ‘Political accountability, we stipulated, represents a broad, two-dimensional concept that denotes both answerability – the obligation of public officials to inform about their activities and to justify them – and enforcement – the capacity to impose negative sanctions on officeholders who violate certain rules of conduct. In experiences of political accountability, both aspects are usually present’. To make this happen, public spirited intellectuals and bodies should demand for effective public participation in public decision making, beyond placing their votes on the ballot paper. 

Public participation, is imperative and requires continuous interaction and communication between government and citizens, interest of the citizens in participation and interest of the government in citizen‘s participation, manifested through transparency, creation of several mechanisms of participation other than the vote, and responsiveness. Responsiveness means that when deciding, government must take into consideration what citizens said through participatory mechanisms.

The International Association for Public Participation developed the ―IAP2 Core Values for Public Participation, for use in the development and implementation of public participation processes. They condense the issues presented above: 

1. Public participation is based on the belief that those who are affected by a decision have a right to be involved in the decision-making process. 

2. Public participation includes the promise that the public’s contribution will influence the decision. 

3. Public participation promotes sustainable decisions by recognizing and communicating the needs and interests of all participants, including decision makers. 

4. Public participation seeks out and facilitates the involvement of those potentially affected by or interested in a decision. 

5. Public participation seeks input from participants in designing how they participate. 

6. Public participation provides participants with the information they need to participate in a meaningful way. 

7. Public participation communicates to participants how their input affected the decision. 

Thus, unless there is meaningful public participation in public decision making, politicians of all sorts whether in Parliament, PCs or LG, will continue to play around with public mandate given to them in ways which are beneficial to them personally and eat into the public purse at will, in concert with the rogue sections of the public administration. Even at the risk of repetition, it must be stressed that politics is a too serious matter to be left in the hands of politicians; that too the type of sycophants in our houses of decision making. 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 7
    2

    …Sri Lanka appears to be sliding down towards a point of no return.
    *
    Sri Lanka is well past the point of no return imho.
    *
    Sri Lanka has become a Corrupt, Lawless, Bankrupt Failed State imho.

    • 0
      0

      .UKCitizen

      Ah boy, it’s premature

      SL can recover.

      • 0
        0

        I’d be very interested to hear how you think SL can recover.
        *
        Do you have any idea how deep the hole is that has been dug? Sri Lankans in general are extremely naive in my opinion – blind to the real problems.
        *
        You do understand that the IMF is running the country? (Your Corrupt Politicians won’t admit this though).
        *
        So the country is none of the things I’ve listed?

    • 0
      0

      Columbia is voting today to reduce by 40 percent the salary and perks of its Parliamentarians /congress, force declaration of assets of parliamentarians and to make the award of govt. contracts transparent and lobbying firms activities too.

      Sri Lanka too needs such a public education campaign and legislation as in Columbia to reduce the numbers of politicians and their salaries and perks to reduce corruption and money politics

  • 3
    0

    It’s Okay Harees, I am used to extravaganza and giving charity anyway. What you think more than 60% of every single Rupee I pay to government is spent on huuuge state sector that does nothings better for the country.

    Saudi Arabia has oil, Qatar has gas, EU has industries, US has technologies to be rich. And SL has idiotic population to make politicians and others who think the state sector job is their birth-right get rich at but nothing in return :-(

  • 4
    1

    As long as the damage to the country is done by the Sinhala Buddhists, it’s ok.
    This is the present SriLankan mentality

  • 2
    0

    There is no earthly use in ‘ playing flute to a deaf elephant ‘ so goes the sinhala saying. In the case of present two leaders even if you play a trumpet or a Base Guitar they will pretend not to hear. Reasons are obvious, they are hell bent on coming back to power by hook or by crook as they very well know they cannot play this double game . They would’t mind even if MR returns to power as birds of the feather will and can flock together. If one of MR’s acolytes is a doubtful aspirant he would’t mind supporting RW, as he is cock sure he will protect his family and entire gang of rogues. Wither Sri lanka? Ardent UNP supporters can eat the humble pie. If the two leaders are honest and genuine they still have a chance to save their faces in society. We hope and pray that wisdom will prevail.

  • 1
    0

    84 % of parliamentarians and the majority of ‘local government’ councillors have not even passed their O Levels, it is reported.
    But, they got enough votes to be elected.
    Hence, the blame for this state of affairs should be on the voters, who are ‘influenced’ by various means.

    There needs to be a minimum educational achievement, to stand for elective office.
    Corruption has permeated to the core, but the various commissions to check it are ineffective.
    Why no case against politicos who accepted Rs One Million each from the CB Bond Scammers?
    Sri Lanka has gone past the point of “no return”.
    Very soon we will descend to the level of Zimbabwe, for example.

  • 0
    0

    My dear Henry,

    It should be playing violin to a deaf elephant, not flute.

    Not a major mistake mate. Good luck.

  • 0
    0

    Harees, you are too early to praise Imran Khan and Mahathir. Both are too new to analyse. I think both are going to be disasters.

  • 0
    0

    Nawaz Sharif is the man for Pakistan, Harees is wrong here

  • 0
    0

    When it is a $40 billion economy they all put hand into the til. Mahinda was the biggest hora.

  • 0
    0

    Lukman Harees has added to the list of the corruption/nepotism/impunity obtaining in our country. He wants a Lankan version of Imran or Mahathir.
    .
    Though not an angel, Mahathir may succeed because though Malaysia is not secular, the influence of religion is managed, the Armed Services and Police are under the control of the government AND there is Law & Order.
    .
    Will Imran succeed in Pakistan?
    Corruption/nepotism/impunity is the rule, the Armed Services are mono-race and has evolved into an independent state within a state, the Police a Law unto themselves, Law & Order almost non-existent, religious interference is taken for granted. For example late last week Sunni-Islamist mob shot at racially identical Ahmadis and set fire to an Ahmadi Mosque in Faisalabad. In 1974, Pakistan’s parliament adopted a law declaring Ahmadis to be non-Muslims and so……………..
    Will Imran try to bridle the bigots?
    We can only wish him success.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.