8 August, 2022


Need To Safeguard Multi-Ethnic Majority By Keeping All Sides In Mind 

By Jehan Perera

Jehan Perera

Jehan Perera

The 25th anniversary of the Muslim expulsion from the north was observed last week through a number of events, including in the north. The most high profile commemorative event took place in Colombo with a panel discussion held under the aegis of the SLMC and its leader Minister Rauff Hakeem. The key speakers were political leaders from all communities and included Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera, Resettlement Minister D M Swaminathan and TNA parliamentarian M A Sumanthiran. There were also prominent civil society representatives who spoke on the occasion including law lecturer N Selvakkumaran of Colombo University, independent researcher Mirak Raheem and Shreen Saroor who represented the voice of the displaced northern Muslim community.

The strong sense of goodwill that permeated the discussion was manifested by TNA parliamentarian Sumanthiran’s pledge that he would speak up louder on the issue even though he has spoken loudly about it in the past. The government representatives in their speeches made it clear that they wanted to heal the wounds of war and repair the damage to the victims to the extent possible. Minister Samaraweera addressed the “post-independence failure to build a peaceful and prosperous Sri Lanka that is united and undivided both on the map and in its citizens’ hearts and minds.” He referred to the notion of majoritarianism that made a majority community unwilling to accept a multi-ethnic and multi-religious society in which the majority will not discriminate or oppress the minority.

The narrow defeat of the Rajapaksa government in January was by a multi ethnic and multi religious majority. This was repeated more convincingly in August and bodes well for the future, but it is a victory that needs to be protected. As pointed out by Minister Samaraweera the eviction of the Muslims of the north was a manifestation of a majoritarian mindset in which there was a “belief that the power of the numerical majority was a justification for violating the rights of individuals and minority groups.” This is a weakness that Sri Lankan society, manifested in both the north and south, that needs to overcome both through a long and never ending process of education at all levels of society and also through the establishment of a state that applies the Rule of Law equally to all.

Surest Guarantee

At the current juncture Sri Lanka faces many serious challenges including on the economic and international fronts. The economy is heavily burdened and is the primary concern of most people who are struggling every day to meet the challenge of balancing their budgets. But for Sri Lanka to be stable and peaceful, which is the pre-requisite for economic take-off, it is necessary to preserve and grow the multi-ethnic and multi-religious majority both in Parliament and outside in the society at large. This will be the surest guarantee that the country will never again descend into inter-community conflict on the scale that occurred in the past. In order to ensure this, it is important to each and every community and the individuals that comprise it feel that the Sri Lankan state is treating them equitably as members of their communities and equally as individuals.

Muslims in Sri LankaAt the commemoration of the 25th anniversary of the Northern Muslim expulsion, Minister Swaminathan gave a pledge that the government would ensure that all Muslim families who lost their homes in 1990 would be compensated. He said that the government would build them pre-fabricated houses with furniture, which shows the intention of the government to compensate them on the most generous terms and speedily. While the sentiments of goodwill came through clearly the question is whether this proposal has been rigorously considered, both in terms of financial costing and other implications. There also appears to be lack of clarity over the number of those who still remain displaced. Minister Samaraweera referred to a figure of around 80 percent of the original 75,000 displaced Muslims continuing to remain displaced. However, Minister Swaminathan made an assertion that based on figures given to him by government departments in the North, there were only 2800 families that remain displaced.

While the costs of providing pre-fabricated and furnished houses for 2800 families may have been budgeted by the government as being affordable, the cost of providing this same facility to 10,000 families will be significantly more. The number may be still larger as there will have been the natural increase in the number of households living displaced after 25 years as children form their own families and require separate houses. The discrepancy in numbers cited by the two ministers brings into question what definition of displacement is being used. Many displaced Muslim families have gone back to their original places of residence to register themselves with the government authorities in those areas. Their applications to reclaim their lost properties may have been accepted. But this does not mean they are no longer displaced. They may not have been able to come back to reside in their original places of inhabitation from which they were expelled.

Holistic Response

Shortly after the end of the war when I went to Jaffna, I met with several displaced Muslims who had been urged by their political leaders to go back and claim their properties, but who were finding it very difficult to restart their lives. There was no enabling environment for that. Colombo University’s Selvakkumaran referred to this reality when he said “There should be genuine programmes to promote mutual respect and understanding between these people and those who are living there. The return of the displaced people should not be seen and viewed by those who are living there as an intrusion into their lives or livelihoods.” He also pointed to the need for “provincial council and its administration as well as local authorities” to take meaningful steps to ensure “provision and establishment of infrastructure facilities such as schools, mosques and places for engaging in trade and vocation.”

There is also another important factor that needs to be kept in mind. This is the sense of relative deprivation that may arise if one set of deserving people are given good quality houses while those in neighboring communities do not get similar benefits. The northern Muslims were displaced from areas where other war-affected people also live. Those people who belong to the other communities must not feel that they are being left out or left behind to live in poorer quality housing. Civic activist Shreen Saroor pointed to the divisions within the Muslims themselves between those who had been displaced and those who were not displaced. If the sentiments of neighboring communities are not considered in the resettlement process, it could set in motion the possibility of new inter-community and also intra-community conflicts. Even if they are not provided with the new pre-fabricated houses, their areas could be provided with the same level of infrastructure support referred to by Selvakkumaran above.

One of the important messages to come out of the commemoration of the 25th anniversary of the Muslim expulsion was by independent researcher Mirak Raheem. He pointed out the larger context in which the expulsion of the northern Muslims took place. A few months previously in June, 600 policemen of Sinhalese ethnicity had been separated out and executed by the LTTE after they had been ordered to surrender by the Sri Lankan government that was desperately trying to sustain the ceasefire with the LTTE. This was followed a few months later by the army entry into the Vantharamoolai welfare camp where some 40,000 displaced Tamils were staying in, and 158 were taken out never to be seen again. All communities in the war-affected areas became victims and today they all await justice. It is therefore important that the government response to the injustices faced by the different communities, and by each and every individual, should not be ad hoc, but should be well planned and cohesive. Goodwill is the necessary first step, and is the welcome hallmark of the present multi-ethnic and multi-religious government, but it needs to be cohesive and holistic in approach, and one in which all aspects are taken into consideration.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 4

    Rajapakse need not worry about his future. Muslims pray that Rajapakse will remain strong and patient. So long as there are educated Sinhalese who simply hate the Muslims for no harm caused to them personally by Muslims, but simply because they are Muslims (as displayed in the Comments), there will be another occasion to unite with the Tamils and show the broom to the ungrateful, gutless, lying invertebrates, be they Sirisena or Ranil or any other.

    Sri Lanka will find no salvation from the Pendulum Politics and the consequent social, economic and political stagnation until such time the educated Sinhalese find a cure for their inferiority complex.

    • 1

      Tamils are not pendulums. They only swing to one side if they are free. Sinhalese are pendulums they swing both sides. Muslims – two half pendulums each one swinging other way at the same time. So we have many types of pendulums.
      But it is time we give a chance to My3. Country has never had a leader like him. Not a pendulum – but a simple human being with average human values. A true Buddhist Hindu Muslim and a Christian.Sri Lanaka cant ask for more at this time.

      • 0

        You have a long way to go before you understand ‘pendulum’ as a figure of speech. Try this : Legs apart, sway left, sway right, repeat, repeat. Bend forward from hips; then backwards; repeat, repeat. Observe movement of the pendulum. You will know how to use ‘pendulum’ as a figure of speech.

  • 2

    What did Raul Hakim do while he was a cabinet minister and confidante in the Rajapakse government since the end of war in 2009. He never addressed the problem of Muslim resettlement. Neither did he say one word about the atrocities faced by the Tamils and Muslims.
    I certainly agree the poor Muslims who were evicted should be resettled. But why this cry at this time? Is it because Mangala Samaraweera thinks that the Muslim resettlement project is the easiest way to appease the UNHRC.
    Any concession to Tamils at this juncture will incur the wrath of Pro-rajapakse Sinhala hardliners. Whereas a good deed like Muslim resettlement is much easier and it can be considered an example of Human Right restoration to impress the International Community. At the same time there is no risk of protest from Sinhala Buddhist chauvinists.

    • 1

      Politicians of Sri Lanka are self servers. Rauf Hakeem is no exception. His actions are only a reaction to the Government actions and those of Sinhala politicians.

      Sinhalese want advantages over and above members of the other communities. Their politicians facilitate. Voters reciprocate by voting for them.

      Sinhalese are split in the middle between the MaRa type of politician, more barbaric, and the Ranil/Sirisena type of politician, less barbaric. They are the Pendulum. When Tamils and Muslims want to influence the direction of the Pendulum, they attach themselves to the side they favour, to increase the momentum in that direction.

      Any one who is not blind to the history of the last 60 years will no doubt agree.

      So, Mahinda, take heart, Tamils and Muslims may have kicked your butt last August; but they will need you again when RaSirisena gets intoxicated – like you did before.

      I agree with Ahmed Reza: Pendulum Politics in Sri Lanka will continue into the foreseeable future. We are all fucked.

  • 0

    Is it wise to take such after party or get together talks seriously and comment on?

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.