30 November, 2020

Blog

Paradox In Central Bank’s Monetary Policy

By W.A Wijewardena

Dr. W.A Wijewardena

Dr. W.A Wijewardena

Paradox in Central Bank’s monetary policy: Not everyone approves of the policy direction

Wrong monetary policy direction of the Central Bank

The IMF’s Resident Representative for Sri Lanka and the Maldives, Dr. Eteri Kvintradze, a former Deputy Minister of Finance of Georgia Republic, opined in a recent seminar at the Postgraduate Institute of Management or PIM that Sri Lanka’s monetary policy should be “forward-looking”.

What she meant by “forward-looking” was that the monetary policy, instead of focussing on day-to-day inflation numbers, should be based on medium- to long-term price stability aligning the policy to exchange rate stability and creating long-term conditions for sustained economic growth.

Earlier in September, IMF Mission Chief to Sri Lanka, Todd Schneider, is reported to have made a similar remark at a media conference in Colombo. He also had emphasised that Sri Lanka should not cut rates but look at tightening monetary policy in view of the rising core inflation numbers and private sector borrowings from commercial banks (available here ).

Independent think-tanks such as the Institute of Policy Studies or IPS and independent analysts too have questioned the wisdom of the Central Bank’s monetary policy direction in the recent past.
For instance, IPS, in its latest State of the Economy 2015 Report has termed the current monetary policy as a ‘misalignment with the exchange rate’. (A review available here ) meaning that the present exchange rate debacle of the country is a creation of the Central Bank.

An independent analyst writing under the penname Bellwether has cautioned that Sri Lanka’s low interest rate policy may take the country in the PIGS (Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain) path that would lead the country to total economic bankruptcy (available here ).

This writer too, in a number of previous articles under this series, has questioned the appropriateness of the Central Bank’s current monetary policy obsessed with lowering interest rates and expanding credit levels to private sector.

For instance, in an article titled ‘Central Bank’s monetary policy review: Is there a hidden macroeconomic anomaly?’ in September 2014, this writer expressed the view that the distortion of the interest rate structure would result in an elephantine macroeconomic problem exerting pressure on the exchange rate to depreciate and putting the Government budget into a precarious situation.

Though the Central Bank disputed this writer’s assertion at that time, evidence since then has shown that that early warning has become prophetic. The consensual view of all those economists outside the Central Bank is and was that the current monetary policy direction of the bank involving a low interest rate structure and expanded credit base is myopic.

Using loose monetary policy as a magic wand to remove structural impediments to growth

Why has the Central Bank loosened the monetary policy stance since about 2013? According to the monetary policy statements issued by the bank month after month, there have been two reasons that have prompted the bank to do so.

One is the deceleration of inflation rate, as the bank has read the inflation numbers, in the last 15 months consecutively. This deceleration has been more pronounced in first nine months of 2015 when the Colombo Consumers Price Index recorded either a decline or remained more or less stagnant.

The other is the need for accelerating economic growth through an expansion of private sector credit. It thus appears that the bank is of the belief that credit levels are a magic wand that would keep the economy going despite the presence of many structural impediments that stand in the way for the economy to expand output and employment. Such impediments have been demonstrated by the low ranking of the country in global competitiveness, budget openness, governance and innovation, to mention but a few.

Credit expansion in an import-prone economy will worsen balance of payments

The bank is obviously following a Keynesian-type economic policy here which advocates that an increase in money supply giving extra buying power to people would increase their total demand for goods and services thereby stimulating the supply side of the economy. Naturally, when there is a demand, it has to be met and the bank has presumed that producers would step up production to meet that demand. To increase production, producers have to utilise more natural resources and hire more people. It would automatically increase output and accelerate economic growth in multiple terms, according to this ideology.

But the founding Governor of the Central Bank, John Exter, has cautioned those who would take the Central Bank along that path to create prosperity for people in his report to the Government recommending the establishment of the Central Bank, known as the Exter Report.

Says Exter: “In a country like Ceylon, however, which is very dependent upon imports, in which half the productive resources are devoted to export, and which is chronically short of capital equipment, such policies would tend to raise domestic prices without producing an adequate response in domestic output. Instead, higher domestic income would stimulate the consumption of imported goods and precipitate serious balance of payments difficulties (pp 20-1).

Wisdom from neighbouring Singapore

Singapore’s first Finance Minister, Dr. Goh Keng Swee, too expressed the same view of Central Bank sponsored credit expansions to stimulate an economy which is dependent on external trade.
In the 25th anniversary publication of the Board of Currency of Singapore titled ‘Prudence at the Helm’, Swee explained why Singapore opted to have a currency board instead of a central bank which can create bank credit and stimulate an economy. Says Swee: “None of us believed that Keynesian economic policies could serve as Singapore’s guide to economic well-being. Our economy was and is both small and open. Financing budget deficits through central bank credit creation appeared to us as an invitation to disaster….The way to better life was through hard work, first in schools, then in universities or polytechnics and then on the job in the work place. Diligence, education and skills will create wealth, not Central Bank credit” (p 33).

Nation expects the Central Bank to preserve the value of its financial wealth

Therefore, the Central Bank should use its power to fix monetary policy with due care and caution. In the issue of every currency note, it has given a sacred and solemn undertaking to people. That is, the bank would take appropriate monetary policy measures to preserve its value over the time. In laymen’s language, this amounts to maintaining a virtually inflation free world over the medium to long term.

But, what is an inflation free world? It is a situation where prices are free from pressure to change either way because all the systems and sectors in the economy are perfectly in balance and harmony with each other. Economists call this ‘macroeconomic stability’.

Central Bank’s mandate is to take a holistic view of the macro economy

This fact was taken into account when the Monetary Law Act, the governing legislation of the bank, was amended in 2002 re-defining its objectives. Accordingly, instead of just saying price stability, ‘economic and price stability’ was made the bank’s co-objective. The circumstances leading to the amendment of the Act and what was meant by economic and price stability were discussed by this writer in a previous article in this series titled ‘Central Bank’s Mandate is to attain both economic and price stability’.

Price indices alone are misleading because they can be manipulated by politicians

The true meaning of economic and price stability is as follows: A central bank’s job is not to maintain the stability of a price index but the stability of the whole economy. This is because price indices can be made stable through artificial means.

For instance, the Government can keep the prices low by giving a subsidy, by cutting administered prices like fuel, LP gas and electricity tariffs or controlling prices. Or the worst, by manipulating the price index through such means as ‘trimming’ or taking out important consumer items from the basket. For instance, in Sri Lanka’s CCPI on which the Central Bank bases its monetary policy decisions, tobacco and alcohol are still taboos.

A deceleration in the price index through artificial means is only ‘easing of cost of living’

Those artificial measures taken by a Government would surely cause a consumer price index to grow slowly thereby recording a low rate of growth. That is not deceleration of inflation, but easing of cost of living.

However, a Central Bank cannot be happy about this development if there are imbalances in other crucial sectors in the economy, namely, the government budget, balance of payments or real growth. That is because the imbalances in these sectors can adversely affect the bank’s attempts at stabilising prices.

It has already been shown by an acceleration of the core-inflation which is free from such price reductions to 4.7% by end October 2015. Hence, the Central Bank, in designing its monetary policy should have a holistic view of the economy rather than having a narrow view on the changes in a price index which can be manipulated by the Government to attain its political objectives at the expense of long-term growth or stability in the economy. Central banks are not owned by politicians but by the nation and, therefore, should function as apolitical organisations.

Government budget is in a precarious situation

In the recent past, the Central Bank has been keeping interest rates at a low level and encouraging credit expansion by going by a price index which has been manipulated by the Government by cutting administered prices, resorting to price controls and taking important consumer items out of the basket.

But at the same time, there have been serious imbalances in both the government budget and the country’s balance of payments that depicts the true status of its external sector. Government revenue has been falling, expenditure ballooning and budget deficit expanding. It has already missed the deficit targets for 2015. The Central Bank’s accommodation of the Government’s financing requirements has increased sharply from Rs. 5 billion at the beginning of the year to Rs. 174 billion, the latest.

The Government has been forced to borrow on two occasions by issuing sovereign bonds in the international markets amounting to a total of $ 2 billion. Hence, the fiscal sector imbalance which is a threat to Central Bank’s economic and price stability objective has been looming over the whole country.

External sector too is in a crisis

On the other side of the equation, the country’s external sector has been in a very precarious situation starting from early 2012. Exports which fell significantly in that year have not yet recovered sufficiently and in 2015 so far, it is a decline over the exports of the previous year by about 2%.

At the same time, imports have remained stubbornly at their 2012 levels despite the relief given by the decline in the fuel prices in the world markets. Thus, the trade deficit has remained around $ 8 billion throughout.

Since the country has been financing its current account deficit primarily through external borrowings, it has not been able to repay the country’s loan commitments or pay interest on past foreign loans without re-borrowing from the external markets. The investments by foreigners in Treasury bills and bonds have fallen from $ 4.5 billion a year ago to $ 2.1 billion, the latest, causing foreign reserves to fall from $ 8 billion to $ 6.7 billion.

On top of this, the loan repayment commitments and interest payment obligations over the next 12-month period have shot up to $ 4.4 billion as against a cash reserve of $ 5.9 billion. This emerging fragile external sector has forced the Government to raise $ 1.5 billion from international markets recently. Despite that, the pressure for the exchange rate to depreciate is mounting.

Alarming developments in money supply and credit levels which the Central Bank cannot ignore

The deceleration of the Colombo Consumers Price Index in the last 10-month period is a technical achievement and not the outcome of balancing total demand with total supply. It has certainly relieved the cost of living of people but it has done so by creating significant holes elsewhere in the economy.

Hence, given the above imbalances in the government budget and the external sector, the Central Bank cannot be complacent about the emerging monetary conditions of the country.

By end-August 2015, the narrow money supply consisting of currency and demand deposits held by public has increased annually by 20%, while broad money consisting of narrow money plus time and savings deposits of the public has increased by 17%.

Meanwhile, the reserve money base of the Central Bank that would be used by banks to create multiple deposits and credit over the next 18 months or so has increased sharply by 20%.

Private sector credit too is rising at an annual rate of 20-23%. All indications are that Sri Lanka is heading toward a serious macroeconomic crisis in the period to come. Its monetary policy action would further be complicated when the Government uses the proceeds of the recently borrowed $ 1.5 billion to finance its expenditure programs. That is not small sum but well over Rs. 210 billion.

It would cause the Central Bank to buy those dollars and release rupees, augmenting the already high excess market liquidity on one hand and raising the reserve money base to uncontrollable levels, on the other. With the current low interest rate policy, the bank would not be able to resolve the problem without losing its reputation.

The good physician Central Bank giving sugar to a diabetic

Thus, the Central Bank which is the physician charged with the task of curing the macroeconomic ailments through its monetary policy should take an apolitical and objective policy stand. It requires the bank to increase interest rates and not cut interest rates further in order to curtail the credit levels in the economy.

This is a painful action but that is what the bank is expected to do in such a situation. To attain its objective, it has to get the full cooperation of the new Good-Governance Government.

Minister of Finance should not frighten international investors

In this background, it is disheartening to note the announcement made by the Minister of Finance, as reported by Reuters in a report datelined from London on 29 October 2015 that the minister wants the Central Bank to cut interest rates to a level of 4-5%.

One can understand the predicament of the minister who is desirous of having a high growth rate which is, according to the estimates of IMF, to fall to a level of 5 to 5.5% this year. But reducing the interest rates at this juncture is similar to giving an additional sugar dose to a diabetic who already has high sugar levels in his blood. Such public announcements made by the minister also undermine the independence of the Central Bank and its position among global market participants.

Investors outside the country rely, not on the sovereign government, but on the Central Bank for taking appropriate and timely policies to safeguard their interests in the country. That assurance will be given by a Central Bank functioning, in their eyes, as an institution free from narrow political interferences.

Sri Lanka cannot function like an island separate from other nations anymore, since foreign investors have stakes in the country in a big way today in the form of their investments in domestic Treasury bills and bonds and global sovereign bonds. Any political manipulation of the monetary policy will give a temporary relief to the Government but frighten away existing as well as prospective investors.

Wisdom of Goh Keng Swee comes in handy

At a time when independent analysts have found fault with the Central Bank for not increasing interest rates, such a Government-sponsored reduction in the rates will totally be counterproductive.

Perhaps, Sri Lankan politicians can learn from the wisdom of Dr. Goh Keng Swee, who has justified the action taken by early Singapore leadership to assure international markets. Says Swee: “Our intention was to inform the financial world that our objective was to maintain a strong convertible Singapore Dollar. This remains the best protection against inflation.” (p 34).

*W.A Wijewardena, a former Deputy Governor of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, can be reached at waw1949@gmail.com

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 1
    1

    Do not follow Singapore! Their economic just avoided a technical recession. The country’s low interest rate policies of many years now have resulted in gigantic bubbles formed in various sectors and an economy poised to pop causing a massive market crash and subsequent weakening of the Singapore dollar. Singapore is a bad example to follow!

    All this talk of setting interest rates is ignoring the fact that the rate is in fact the price of money! Therefore setting interest rates to one number or another has the effect of price fixing.

    What are the consequences of this? If you price-fix any good – say dhal, in time the unintended consequence of this action would be huge. Artificial markets (in alternatives to dhal) would be created and natural markets destroyed (manufacturers of dhal).

    How can any individual or group of individuals fix interest rates? It is akin to replacing market forces. It is trying to play God! It is futile and massively destructive to any economy. Stop the game of interest rate fixing and let it go. Let the market decide what interest rates should be. Let nature take its course.

    In fact, let’s not have a central bank – it serves no purpose whatsoever. Let’s close the unit. Let our money be gold and silver and things that are real! Only with real exchange can our economy grow and deflation, being the natural ally of a growing economy, become a reality.

    • 1
      0

      Rizwan,

      “Let the market decide what interest rates should be. Let nature take its course.”

      The Rizwan theorem explains why the Ayn Rand zealot and market fundamentalist Alan Greenspan refused to intervene when the bubbles broke out in 2008. We all know what the consequences of Greenspan’s action (or should I say non-action?) led to!

      Market this and market that. Market, my foot!

      • 1
        1

        Good analysis here Dr. Wije.
        Either Dr. Dushni Weerakoon or Dr.Saman Kelegama of IPS should head the CB.

        Sorry to say, that the Central Bank is headed by a corrupt and bloated PIG who does not have the qualifications for the job and hence is bent on turning Lanka into a bankrupt PIGS country like Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain. And this assessment has nothing to do with Mahendran’s ethnicity, but rather his qualifications or lack thereof to be CB head.

        Arjuna Mahendan is an insider trader and a bond market seller implicated in corruption with his Son-in-law and Perpetual treasuries. He NOT a qualified economist.

        Civil society must push for an investigation of Mahendran and his son-in-law and that firm Perpetual treasuries. Neither is Ravi K who also has massive fraud and corruption carges fit to be the Minister of Economic Development. He is in the same league as the corrupt and criminal Basil Jarapassa.
        Unless civil society goes on the offensive to stop the CB penalizing savers by cutting interest rates to promote reckless spending and show GDP growth figures on borrowed money, the Lankan economy is going to crash and corruption thrive.
        The funds from the loans go into the pockets of corrupt big businesses and the INEQUALITY GAP is growing as the currency loses value and the poor are penalized on all sides.

        • 1
          0

          Don Stanley,

          “this assessment has nothing to do with Mahendran’s ethnicity, but rather his qualifications or lack thereof to be CB head.”

          Arjuna Mahendran studied Philosophy, Politics and Economics at Oxford. I presume he graduated, unlike Sajith whom Dayan is recommending for the post of President,

          His son-in-law maybe corrupt. That does not mean that he is also corrupt. Like father, like son. It’s not Like father-in-law, like son-in law… you get the point?

          The 3-member committee of lawyers who inquired into the bond issue did not find any direct involvement by Mahendran. The 3-member group of good governance were also not given leave to proceed when they petitioned the Supreme Court.

          If you think any law has been broken, please inform the Supreme Court immediately.

          If you think the transaction was not ethical, well, then, that’s a different story altogether!

      • 0
        0

        GDP growth rate fetishism is the fool’s paradise, and both Mahendran and the other corrupt clown at the CB Nivard Cabraal were fools.

        A high GDP growth is not an indicator of a healthy economy as Sen and Stiglitz has argued.

        High GDP growth is often the result of corruption and massive inequality, that destabilizes societies and causes dangerous conflicts.

        Slow and steady growth is better, albeit something better than the ‘Hindu rate’ of growth is desirable. Also as societies get wealthier the rate of GDP growth may decrease as the base gets higher.

      • 0
        1

        ” market fundamentalist Alan Greenspan refused to intervene when the bubbles broke out in 2008. We all know what the consequences of Greenspan’s action (or should I say non-action?) led to!”

        This is incorrect. Greenspan cut interest rates to zero in 2001 at the popping of the first bubble at that time. It was his zero interest rate policies that led to the crash of 2008 under Bernanke.

        However in 2008 the popping of the bubble and subsequent market correction was prevented through Quantitative Easing. Therefore that artificial economy that should have ended was allowed to carry on. Now, in 2015, we are observing that bubble is many times greater than in 2008 and we observe, through the US economy numbers, the slow collapse of it as the QE drug wears off.

        When nature is finally allowed to take its course the 2008 crash will look like a happy time.

        • 1
          0

          Rizwan,

          My opinion of Greenspan as a non-interventionist is primarily informed by two important events: the dot-com bubble and the derivative derived disaster(3D!).

          It’s only when the dot-com bubble burst did Mr. Greenspan consider increasing interest rates. A classic case of shutting the stable door after the horse had bolted!

          The derivatives derived disaster is well captured in a Washington Post article that appeared in October 2008. The article titled What Went Wrong was authored by Anthony Faiola, Ellen Nakashima and Jill Drew. It draws attention to a triumvirate – Greenspan, Rubin and Levitt who browbeat Brooksley E. Born, the then head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, into the position that derivatives need no regulating and that self-regulation will take care of things, which is similar to the echo that I hear from Diya Rakusa (a.k.a. Charitha Ratwatte Jnr.) whose greatest accomplishment to date has been selling exotic rice from car parks around Colombo!

          I am also surprised that you subscribe to the notion of bubbles. Edward Fama, winner of the 2013 Economics Nobel Prize, who currently epitomizes your train of thought has gone on record stating that bubbles don’t exist!

          The malinvestment theory that you subscribe to was referred to as the Hangover theory by a leading economist for very good reason. Get off the booze mate.

  • 0
    0

    While not going so far as the writer Rizwan i think the Central Bank of Sri Lanka should allow market forces to determine the interest rates. Our money supply is determined by our external situation- expanding when there is a surplus in our BOP
    What is the appropriate monetary policy for the present circumstances in the economy? I don’t think there is much scope for an independent autonomous monetary policy. The Central Bank has a very limited role as far as monetary policy is concerned.

  • 1
    2

    I think Mr W A W, has nothing but an axe to grind with the current Governor Mr Arjuna Mahendran, who was a staff officer during Mr W A W’s high level job at the CBSL.
    From the articles he writes, it’s oblivious that he has much time on his hands.
    I suggest he get into bed with his incapacitated head & try to have a cup of good ole Sri Lankan tea , like they make it aT CBSL, IN your day & go to sleep.
    Pop a couple weeks f tablets if you have to.
    You are so surly & sour, there is a new generation out there Mr. who is far more capable of running big institutions, as they have the education & vision having worked for bigger institutions around the world and n higher positions than what you held at the potty CBSL,that you obliviously sadly lack, because you have been marooned Have been marooned In Sri Lanka & was not able to see how things work on n other develeped Countries unlike ours
    Apart from the occasional foreign junket that you were sent on while being Senior Deputy Governor.
    Good night , sleep tight don’t let the bugs at the CBSL make you so rabid.

    • 3
      1

      I don’t think you are correct! as the CBSL Governor position was first offered to Mr. Wijewardena rpior to it being given to the the current Governor. He is just expressing his opinion! Take it or leave it! Mr Wijewardena has many years of experience working in the Central Bank and I am sure he means well in expressing it!!

  • 1
    0

    Every other Sri Lankan Tom, Dick and Harriet harps about Singapore this, Singapore that. Why is that? Is it because Singapore is one of the few countries that gives visa on arrival for Sri Lankan passport holders?

    The reference to Goh Keng Swee by Wijewardena is funny. Swee’s insinuation that the path to prosperity is through hard work, first in schools, then in universities and then on the job is laughable. Let’s take the case of Zimbabwe.

    UNESCO’s 2013 report estimates Zimbabwe’s literacy rate at 83.6 %, which is not that far from Sri Lanka’s literacy rate of 92 %. But the discrepancy in Per Capita Gross National Income (PPP) is astonishing. Zimbabwe is at a measly 1,630 whereas Sri Lanka is at a whopping 10,270! This comparison debunks Swee’s argument that a country can prosper through his stupid formula. Mark Twain once quipped that if you give a man a reputation as an early riser, he can sleep ’til noon. Seems like Swee and Wijewardena are caught up in the joke!

    Swee and Wijewardena’s inference to Singapore’s ability to fight off budget deficits through the creation of a currency board, and not a central bank, is also laughable. This is because these deficit hawks do not account for the external sector. According to the Swee-Wijewardena theorem, all countries in the world can achieve a budget surplus if the follow Singapore’s example!

    Singapore manages a budget surplus because it runs a current account surplus. All countries in the world cannot run a current surplus at the same time. This was well explained by the economist Randall Wray. I reproduce an excerpt from on of his cogent articles:

    “it is not possible for all nations to run current account surpluses—Asian net exporters, for example, rely heavily on sales to the US, which runs a current account deficit to provide the Dollar assets the exporters want to accumulate. We conclude that at least some governments will have to run persistent deficits to provide the net financial assets desired by the world’s savers. It makes sense for the government of the nation that provides the international reserve currency to fill that role. For the time being, that is the US government.”

  • 0
    0

    The SEC has also issued diabolical directives. As a foreign investor I have to have an SIA account in a local bank into which was also credited the sales proceeds and dividends. In 2013 SEC issued a directive that monies in this account could only be spent on investments and my request to spend on gifts was denied. However, I could convert the money to the original foreign currency which, in reality meant I had to convert it back again to spend on those gifts. I hope they have rescinded these rules if not to put off foreign investors.

  • 0
    0

    Now what we are facing is the consequences of 100 days program.
    Prices (duties) were slashed on imported consumer items. Increased consumption of imported items depleted foreign reserves. Mixture of politics and economy.
    If we have substantial foreign reserves and a low inflation no harm in cutting interest rates. In order to avoid politics mixing with monetary policy Central Bank has have some degree of Independence. Central bank is mainly responsible for monetary policy. Fiscal policy is directly handled by the government.

    The present dilemma is to balance the need to retain popularity and to give bitter pills to the people in making tough economic decisions.

    We can talk lots and lots. Foreign investment won’t come instantly as some people anticipate.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.