31 May, 2020

Blog

Reconciliation Requires The Full Commitment Of A Sudu Nelum Movement

By Jehan Perera

Jehan Perera

Jehan Perera

Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, during his recent visit to Jaffna, reiterated a statement he made at a media conference in Colombo that the government would deal with issues of the past through a truth and reconciliation process. He said that former President Chandrika Kumaratunga would lead the process and that it would be supported by South Africa whose advice was being sought. The Prime Minister’s announcement in the capital of the Northern Province, which was the main battleground of the three decade long internal war, demonstrated his decisiveness on a controversial issue, even in the run up to anticipated general elections.   The pressure from the international community with regard to human rights and war crimes issues has continued despite the change of government, which is why the new government is focusing on a truth and reconciliation process at the outset.

The selection of the former president to lead the reconciliation process brings to it a champion who, in the 11 year period of her presidency, showed her ability to take on any political challenge without backing down. She did not give up on publicly upholding the importance of Tamil and minority rights even after her peace initiative with the LTTE was rejected. Although she was forced to wage a high cost war which yielded mixed results in terms of regaining territorial control, she will be remembered for her valiant effort to build the political foundations for peace through political reform. She was also able to win elections while holding to her position that a political solution was necessary.

Former President Kumaratunge’s great contribution to the unification of the Sri Lanka polity came through her two-pronged strategy of meeting the LTTE’s challenge. While waging war, she gave political leadership to the “Sudu Nelum” (white lotus) movement which was a mass-based educational campaign that was intended to enable each ethnic community to understand each other’s political aspirations and engaged in mutual accommodation. This educational campaign was politically led by the present foreign minister Mangala Samaraweera, and took place through seminars, workshops and street drama, among other methods in which top university academics wholeheartedly participated.

Political Backing

The Sudu Nelum educational campaign was complemented by the “Devolution Package” which was co-designed by two leading scholars, Prof G L Peiris representing the government and Dr Neelan Tiruchelvam on behalf of the Tamil polity. President Kumaratunga gave her full political backing to the devolution arrangements which were also supported by the founder leader of the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress M H M Ashraff. These leading members of government took the biggest political educational movement in the country’s history to the people in the face of the deadly opposition of the LTTE, which assassinated Dr Neelan Tiruchelvam, and also of Sinhala nationalists.

Sudu nelumaThe success of the Sudu Nelum movement came from the involvement of the top political leaders who provided a political vision and also actively sought the involvement of civil society to take the message to the general population. The mass educational campaign that reached down to the community-level through small groups meetings and roadside skits also reached national audiences through the mass media and enabled more and more people to recognize that the root causes that had led to the war needed to be politically resolved. Even as the war continued to rage public opinion polls began to show that upwards of 70 percent of the people supported the devolution of power as the foundation on which a peaceful and sustainable solution could be built.

The truth and reconciliation process that the prime minister has committed the government to is meant to look at the unaddressed issues of the war’s end phase, the loss of life, the destruction of property, and the fate of those who went missing, and whose absence is preventing large numbers of families to find closure even five years after the end of the war. The government’s choice of South Africa to assist in this process is a judicious one. South Africa is a non-western country and one that is an acknowledged leader in the world on the issue of truth and reconciliation, having itself overcome great challenges and achieving a success that hardly anyone thought possible. In addition, South Africa has shown a commitment to assist Sri Lanka, continuing to offer their assistance although the previous government blew hot and cold on their offer.

Connected Concepts

The experience of South Africa is important as its truth and reconciliation process was a holistic one and not simply one of ticking boxes in a plan put on paper to score a pass mark with the international community. It was a genuine effort to reach reconciliation at all levels of society. It was intended that all the people should get to know the truth, to repent and to forgive so that the future could be a shared one even while the past was acknowledged. There was no attempt in South Africa to say that accountability and reconciliation were on different tracks. They were both on one track as acknowledging what happened in the past and taking responsibility for it is necessary to build trust for the future that the violations of the past will not happen again.

The truth and reconciliation process needs to a well-engaged one in which all the parties participate and cooperate. The process can neither be forced upon nor opposed by any major party if it is to be successful. One potential problem with a truth and reconciliation process, and one that is domestic as the Sri Lankan government insists, is that the Tamil polity suspects that it is a way for the government to evade accountability for what happened in the past. Statements by some government leaders that accountability and reconciliation are two separate concepts add to their concerns. The present is built on what occurred in the past, and therefore accountability for what happened in the past cannot be separated from achieving reconciliation in the present.

Sustaining reconciliation in the longer term, and ensuring it for the future, calls for a political solution that addresses the roots of the conflict.   In South Africa, the truth and reconciliation process followed the achievement of a political solution. Therefore in Sri Lanka, the truth and reconciliation process, which is a transitional one, needs to be tied up with the development of a just and mutually acceptable political solution, which is what will give stability to society. The Tamil polity’s willingness to cooperate in the truth and reconciliation process will be increased to the extent that they feel it is tied to a just and sustainable political solution. It will be important for the government to show how a domestic truth and reconciliation process is linked to the pursuit of a just political solution, in a manner that resembles what the Sudu Nelum movement once sought to do.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 4
    1

    Mr. Perera
    You are so predictable in what your write, and usually there is nothing new.

  • 1
    2

    Reconciliation process has been repeatedly said by many and Jehan Perera too had said it a few times. Why a reconciliation when the Sinhala community had done nothing wrong against the minority Tamils. If the Sri Lankan Sinhala community wants reconciliation with the Tamils, then it accepts the crimes committed by its Armed forces on the Tamil civilians. There are two parties to the conflict and one party had committed crimes against the other. Under the UN charter, crimes against humanity has to be investigated by the UN. How can Sri Lankan government investigate into the crimes committed by its armed forces against Tamil civilians. Yet the International Community wants to give time and support Internal investigation. What can the Tamil community do. Wait and see and that is the end of it.

    There had been many proposals at various times to grant devolution but failed to do so. Why? Devolution of power to the Tamils seems to be a forgone conclusion and what Ranil spoke of is not what the Tamil people expects. Long ago Late Bandaranayaka, the then Prime Minister declared that “the majority of us feel that in view of the local conditions, particularly racial differences, the most satisfactory method to minimise and gradually remove such differences is a federal system of Government. Such a system of government has in other countries particularly in Switzerland, tended national unity”. He was opposed a Unitary Constitution for Sri Lanka and put forward a Federal Constitution as it was more suitable for conditions prevailing in Sri Lanka. The case of South Africa is completely different from that of Sri Lanka. It need not be explained why it is different. If the Sinhala people and the Sinhala leaders wish that all people in Sri Lanka are human beings and equals, then a Federal system of Government is possible for peace among all, security and prosperity for all.

  • 2
    1

    Jehan,
    Truth reconciliation in South Africa was after the release of Mandela from prison and a negotiated political solution. Why are you and invoking South Africa T & R without the prerequisite political solution. Why do you assume that just repeating SA and T&R the two communities are going to reconcile? Get your horse before the cart.

  • 0
    0

    Who is going to reconcile with whom? You and the whole sinhala buddhist bandwagon seem to be happy standing on your heads. The people in the north and east have been designated as terrorists by the whole world and attacked by the state using the full power of its armed forces and the unconditional support of the WHOLE world! Now the state wants to RECONCILE with its victims and its victims are supposed to grin and accept this RECONCILIATION with gratitude!?

    I thought you had a brain but it seems as though I was mistaken.

    There is no doubt that the rebellion of the people of the north and east against ethnic marginalization and oppression was SEIZED by the FASCISM inherent to the islands people ALL of whom are FASCISTS. This was why the destruction of the armed rebels was supported by the whole world.

    HOWEVER with the destruction of the rebels the problem of the marginalization not only of the people of the north and east but of ALL minorities in the island due to the sick mentality of the majority cpomes clearly to the fore.

    What is required now is not RECONCILIATION but the RESOLUTION of this problem.

    • 0
      0

      Mr C
      You are right, the Sinhalese should not be bothered about RECONCILIATION and just get on with their lives after 30 years of terror.
      As for the SOLUTION Tamil political theorists must propose a model where the 50+% Tamil speaking people living outside North/East are also included. Sinhalese will reject any proposal designed only for North and East.
      Soma

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.