24 May, 2022


Restrictions Placed On Sri Lanka’s RTI Are Overbroad, Vague And Outdated: C’wealth HRI

Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative has today called upon civil society actors in Sri Lanka to demand the roll back of the regressive restrictions on their Right to Information.

Maja Daruwala - Director, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative

Maja Daruwala – Director, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative

Issuing a statement today the CHRI said; “Draft Article 14A has not been placed in the public domain for obtaining people’s views. As RTI is an empowering right, people must be involved fully in its formulation as it is their right. CHRI urges the Government to engage the people of Sri Lanka through a widespread consultative process on the language and contents of Draft Article 14A.”

We publish below the statement in full;

HRI welcomes the efforts underway in Sri Lanka to amend the Constitution in order to insert inter alia a provision recognizing people’s right to access information (RTI). The recognition of RTI of not only natural biological persons but also artificial juridical entities such as corporations and associations and trade unions, is laudable because it is in tune with international best practice standards on information access laws.

However according to the current formulation of Draft Article 14A, RTI may be exercised only against public authorities such as ministries, departments, Parliament, courts and local authorities but not against any private body. In the 21st century several functions performed by the State, earlier, are being transferred to private bodies. There is no reason why private sector entities that perform public functions such as providing education or healthcare or transport and communications facilities eshould be left out of the ambit of people’s RTI. Similarly, RTI must be available against any private body that utilises public funds or controls public assets such as land or infrastructural facilities. Transparency is the minimum requirement for people to be able to demand accountability from such private bodies when their actions impact upon their well being. CHRI calls upon civil society actors to impress upon Parliament the need for enabling people to demand access to information from private bodies as well especially for the protection of any of their rights recognized in law.

Further, some of the restrictions placed on RTI are overbroad, vague, outdated and wholly unnecessary. While it is reasonable to protect the confidentiality of sensitive information if disclosure will substantially harm national security or public health and safety or privacy of any person, it is entirely unjustified to prevent disclosure on grounds of protecting ‘morals’ or simply because ‘information’ has been received in confidence from any person. There can be no objective definition of ‘morals’ agreed upon by everybody even within a single generation let alone across multiple age groups. Preventing access to information on the ground that confidentiality was requested by a person would encourage the unreasonable practice of seeking all information from other persons ‘in confidence’ in order to prevent their disclosure to others. Further, parliamentary privilege must not become a ground for restricting access to information for two reasons-

  1. a)  being the authorized representatives of the people, MPs cannot claim any greater privilege than what is enjoyed by the principals, namely, the people themselves; and
  2. b)  conversely, all information that an MP can obtain must be accessible to the very people who elected them and authorized them to sit, speak and act in Parliament.

Similarly, making ‘reputation’ of other persons a ground for restricting RTI will only result in curbing people’s constitutionally guaranteed right to freedom of speech and expression and its concomitant – the freedom of the press. There should be no restrictions on the dissemination of any information obtained through the exercise of RTI. All these restrictions unreasonably curtail people’s fundamental rights and must be dropped from the amendment proposals.

CHRI calls upon civil society actors in Sri Lanka to demand the roll back of these regressive restrictions on their RTI. Further, Draft Article 14A has not been placed in the public domain for obtaining people’s views. As RTI is an empowering right, people must be involved fully in its formulation as it is their right. CHRI urges the Government to engage the people of Sri Lanka through a widespread consultative process on the language and contents of Draft Article 14A.

Sri Lanka could do well by avoiding half-hearted measures while incorporating a crucial fundamental right like RTI into the Constitution. No other country in South Asia has been parsimonious in guaranteeing RTI to its people.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0

    Let’s get the public bodies included first before we get to the private bodies.

    I agree that private sector should be included may be as a second stage

    • 1

      And what happened to the Bill on the Prevention of Hate Speech?!
      Where is that draft?!

      This govt. seems to be dragging its feet and unable to complete a single project properly.

      The Bribery Commission seems to have no strategy and seems to be fingering a number of cases without completing a single case. Duminda Silva and the corrupt Sri Lankan airlines head who is the former first ladies brother is still NOT BEHIND BARS..

      The Bribery Commissioner needs to have a STRATEGIC plan of action and SEQUENCE its investigations and stop messing up and playing around! It must prosecute the obvious and easy cases IMMEDIATELY and sequence the more complex ones.. We need results, a monitoring and evaluation plan with a results framework!

      • 1


        Last time I checked the Bribery Commission could be contacted through its’ Gmail account. Believe it or not. It does not even have its’ own domain name, secure e-mail or ICT platforms in place.

        It shows how under-funded, under-staffed & ill-equipped these critical arms of governance are in Sri Lanka. Not to mention how unprofessional it is. Most of our embassies operate with Gmail accounts as well.

        However, Sri Lanka does not lack any resources to fund fleets of latest 4WD vehicles for politicians from PS to Presidential level.


  • 1

    These people are talking on political agenda.

    It is the west that destabilized north african islamic states. Now wealthy people from those countries are moving to Europe particularly via Italy. This year alone about 30,000 have perished in the high seas because of sinking the rusty boats. Western media call it people smuggling.

    On the other hand people say, that Europeans, probably Italians, make holes in those ships at the high seas and let the boats sink and then save the people.
    That is how they discourage refugees coming to Europe.

    But,these human right organizations are deaf and dumb with respect to those inhumanities in the developed world.

  • 0

    A rare instance of a reasonable comment from an INGO.
    Sorry madam. The very civil society you call upon have much to hide starting from their funding and other covert aspects of their existence. Most civil society people (read as Colombo based NGOs) want to hide their funding and salaries and other incomes from the public. They will never allow what you ask for.
    The corporations are the same and in fact the two merges in field of mass media.
    How much money is paid as a ‘commission’ to a buyer, usually from a government agency will never be made public. And we don’t see this government trying to prosecute the private sector who allow such things to take place deliberately.
    Whole RTI bill is a farce at its best and a tool for repression of government mechanisms and authority at its worst, and an attempt to weaken peoples’ regard to public service. That is why there is no inclusion of NGOs and private sector.
    Read Wikileaks and you’d see what even some of the INGOs did during war. It can’t change when there is no war and no peace either.

  • 0

    Uvindu,atlast sunil jayasekara sold media freedem to his newpost dy director president media shame , why this trech, act is not expose

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.