17 October, 2021

Blog

“Revolutionaries” Who Threw Away The Arab Spring

By Kumar David

Prof Kumar David

Revolution ousted Mubarak in January 2011 and forced the military regime to hold elections. Islamists won the January 2012 parliamentary poll. The democratic-radical-secular (DRS) opposition should have learnt a lesson and united. But no! Come presidential elections in May, a dozen DRS candidates vied in the primary, split the vote, and though together they gathered 150 lakhs in total their leading candidate was third behind the Brotherhood’s Morsi (58 lakhs) and 55 lakhs for Shafiq of the old establishment. This disqualified the DRS from the run-off and terminated its ascent. After that DRS staggered from one blunder to another.

It is not the DRS alone that deserves condemnation. Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood have been intolerant and incapable of constructing consensus. They stuffed every office with Islamists, packed the constitutional assembly with bigots and rammed through a constitution that embittered Christian and Shia minorities, horrified democrats and demeaned women. This infuriated young people, the educated classes and the cities. To compound it, the government was incompetent in managing the economy; Morsi lost support even in the poor Caironeighbourhoods which were Brotherhood strongholds.  The economy has buckled, there is a fuel shortage, youth unemployment has rise to 40%, and malnutrition is rising.

The main force behind the 14 million strong late June anti-Morsi protest was Tamarod (Rebellion), the youth movement; backing it was the National Salvation Front (NSF), a bourgeois alliance led by Mohamed ElBaradei, former head of UN watchdog, International Atomic Energy Agency. They were thrown together by the bigotry of the Brotherhood which in power was so small-minded that it left the enlightened classes no option but rebellion. The rebels landed straight in the lap of the military, exposing the limits of populist street democracy without revolutionary strategy and perspective; that is without a Lenin.

But Morsi remains the democratically elected President. Is he stupid? Yes, but still the stupid lawfully elected president, ousted in a reactionary military power grab. That the army took cover behind outraged mass protests makes no difference to this raw truth. Now the military is facing a backlash and the Brotherhood refuses to compromise or negotiate till Morsi’s presidency is restored. If anyone wins a future election who can guarantee this won’t happen again? The Brotherhood says: “Democracy is bullocks; if you win its fine; if we win it’s a military takeover”. To this I have heard no credible or rational reply.

Now Tamarod has turned condemned the powers of Adly Mansour (military puppet and interim president) and the NSF has denied a hand in the decrees of the post-coup regime. Both are now trying to disentangle themselves after first cheering the power grab and undermining people’s power. There is confusion on all sides, the army is losing control, the outcome is unpredictable. A referendum on a new constitution in four months, and parliamentary and presidential polls early next year, have been promised. Both DRS and Brotherhood participated in the revolution against Mubarak; now they are at each others throats and the so-called radicals and liberals supported the military coup.

The military’s self-serving demands are an amnesty for the generals who grabbed power and protection of the vast business empire of generals and ex-generals. Morsi in power shielded the army and police, preventing prosecution of those responsible for killing thousands during the revolution. Instead he encouraged Islamist thugs, and arrested and harassed young revolutionaries on trumped up charges. He was been duly repaid by the army, which massacred 50 of his supporters protesting against his detention on 8 July!

Terminating Morsi’s presidency by constitutional means or crushing him and the Brotherhood at the next elections is what the Tamarod cum liberal democratic build up should have done. They should never have paved the way for a military coup.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    0

    United we stand divided we fall. The lesson is to learn to and coexist as a nation. Religon cannot be forced on the populace. Truth and Justice must be upheld. Tyranny, Corruption and Nepotism abhored. Militarism is inexcusable and unacceptable.

  • 0
    0

    David,

    A clear analysis of the state of affairs in Egypt.

    Thiru

  • 0
    0

    Imagine the situation in Sri Lanka today, if we villages accepted the advice of these so-called liberal and educated intellectuals and followed the Arab spring? We would be in worse situation than Egypt. Fortunately, villagers in Sri Lanka have much more common sense than professoris.

    • 0
      0

      A lone, cocker-spaniel comment like yours hardly stands up against an intellectual work like the article…effectively, you birped..the stink is familiar!

  • 0
    0

    “Terminating Morsi’s presidency by constitutional means or crushing him and the Brotherhood at the next elections.”

    What nonsense. Brotherhood is well entrenched into the mindsets of the rural masses of the Egypt. If there would be any elections under Morsi it would be an election of Zimbabwean type. The good marxist doctor will have to come out with a different solution without overtly relying on manipulative elections. Beware in Sri Lanka, Bodu Balu Sena will eventually become the Sinhala Brotherhood.

  • 0
    0

    No wonder India does not want to use the DRS !! . David must have talked to them

  • 0
    0

    Here is a comment by another revolutionary whose party threw away so many chances thinking that THEY will form the next government because the revolution is around the corner. Unfortunately, these people have been so much out of touch with reality that they have exponentially decreased they credibility with the people, and even lost their trade union support
    . In the end they had to support the LTTE as the only revolutionary thing going in Sri Lanka — according to them. Then they had to turn to support Fonseka for the president with the UNP, TNA and all the other political riff-raff that had no support of the masses. Then they have been looking for Arab springs, and now he realizes that there is none even in the land of 1001 nights. So out comes a doctoral spin of very hot air.

    Q:Why is it that these people always get their political prognosis wrong?
    A: Because they don’t talk to people, but they read their book and regurgitate some failed revolutionary from the last century or even earlier.

  • 0
    0

    kautilya

    “A: Because they don’t talk to people, but they read their book and regurgitate some failed revolutionary from the last century or even earlier.”

    Did you mean Dayan?

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.