5 March, 2024


Some Lessons Of 2015 General Election

By Aboobacker Rameez

Dr. Aboobacker Rameez

Dr. Aboobacker Rameez

The recently held General Election results show clearly that the people in Sri Lankan have given an explicitly resounding mandate to the ruling party-United National Front, to perpetuate its silent revolution that took place in January 8, 2015. It is, indeed, notable that many survey conducted prior to the election suggested that the UNF would form the government with the coalition partners and thus, the election results confirmed the prediction. There are many lessons that one can learn from the recently concluded election. Some of them are analyzed below:

Defeat of Mahinda Rajapaksa

Ordeal that MR went through in January 8 continued in this election too. He was comprehensively defeated, despite he contested in Kurunagala district, the third massive voter base in Sri Lanka, with the intention of obtaining convincing victory at the district to demand for the Prime Minister post; however, all his efforts went in vain. The reports suggest that total number of votes that the UPFA obtained this time is less than that of the Presidential election results held in January and his entry into Kurunagala district did not make any major difference in the votes of UPFA. Although many theories are touted for the defeat of UPFA, one would not deny the fact that the internal dispute of UPFA led to such debacle.

Mahinda Maithri

Extremist forces are decimated

The significant turn of events in the election was the comprehensive defeat of nationalistic or extremist forces like BBS. It contested in 16 districts and secured only 20377 nationwide which was hardly enough for a seat. Gnanasara Thero, who is well-known for his anti-Muslim rhetoric and is alleged to be the architect of Aluthgama violence occurred in 15 June, 2014, obtained only 5727 preferential votes in Kaluthura district. This goes to show that the people in South do not subscribe to their rhetoric on Sinhala supremacism, nationalism and anti-minority stand. However, it should be noted that 20000 is no small number and all those voted them seem to have approved their ideology which is based on preaching hatred about minorities under the guise of Sinhala nationalism and patriotism. It is not the number of their vote that counts, but their voice, because a lot of them are vocal activists who convey hateful message to the larger masses. It is indeed imperative on the part of law enforcement authorities and the new government to ensure such hatred and lies spewed by such extremist forces against minorities are ceased forthwith. It is also important for the civil society organizations representing the minority communities to engage with a larger majority community to expose the reality and alienate such extremist forces. The election results also show very clearly that the extremist forces in the North backed by the Diaspora and other elements were comprehensively defeated and that the Tamil people rally behind the TNA.

Lessons for Muslim MPs

Although 21 Muslims MPs have been selected to the parliament via different parties, the election results reveal that Muslim MPs contested in the UPFA, who turned a blind eye when the atrocities against the Muslims by the extremist forces were at peak with the tacit approval of Mahinda regime and that they extended their unequivocal support to MR, were largely defeated by the people. Athaullah, Hisbullah, and Cader are some of the defeated MPs who paid the penalty for what they did during the Mahinda regime. It is ironic, however, some of them are now taken into the parliament via national list which is a bad precedent.

It was pointed out by many that the government that ruled the country over the last six months, despite its lapses and controversies in certain issues, was able to restore rule and law, brought the corrupted elements to book, bring down the high rocketing cost of living to certain extent, restore media freedom and so on and so forth. We are optimistic that the same would be perpetuated by the new government and focusing on socio-economic and educational development aspects to move forward the country in a positive direction is absolutely paramount.

*The author is a Senior Lecturer in Sociology at South Eastern University of Sri Lanka. He could be reached at aramees2001@gmail.com

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 2

    The main reason for defeat of Upfa in general election 2015 is JVP has taken nearly 5% of votes. Generally general election voted less than presidential election overall. So percentage of votes will tell the truth. Last presidential election nearly all JVP voters voted for Mahinda. Thr reason is UNP votes percentage is similar as presidential election while UPFA vote percentage reduced. That reduced amount has gone to JVP in most districts. In Moneragala JVP obtain 5% while UNP increased votes by 4% and UPFA decreased their votes by 9%. UPFA strategist thought JVP voters voted for Maithreepala but actually they were voted for Mahinda.

  • 2

    it is not about the numbers of Muslim MPs in parliament that we should be concern rather about the quality of Muslim MPs who could serve this nation. In the past, Sri Raizk. TB jaya, Badi, Ashraff, Hameed, Bakir had imprinted their name in Sri Lankan politics. They not only become Muslim leaders but rather they become national leaders. can these people make some such national contribution while working for Muslim identity?
    Do elected Muslim MPs have any common mission to work on at national and local levels. Like others, Muslim community too have so many Problems such as unemployment, displacement of Northern Muslims, Muslim school problems, Muslim educational and economic problems and do they have any ideas about these issues, do they have any plan how to cope with these issues.
    Today. the qualities of Muslim parliamentarians has gone down? let there be some mechanism to deal with it. Can Muslim community produce can some steps to deal with this issue.
    otherwise, Muslim MPs will be jolly riding over our community. They will use their power to accumulate wealth and money at the expenses of public welfare and it has been going on for some time? is it the fate of Muslims in SL? what happened to some good people like Imthiyaz Bakir? why he is not included in national list of UNP.

  • 4

    Dr. Aboobacker Rameez

    RE:Some Lessons Of 2015 General Election

    Major Lesson

    2015 General Election

    Against UPFA about 6.3 Million Votes
    For UPFA about 4.7 Million Votes

    2015 Presidential Election

    Against Mahinda Rajapaksa about 6.2 Million Votes
    For Mahinda Rajapaksa about 5.7 Million Votes

    So, about 20% of those who voted for Mahinda Rajapaksa did not vote for UPFA.

    Can one separate the factions who voted for UPFA because of

    1. UPFA, the Party irrespective of Mahinda Rajapaksa.

    2. Because of Mahinda Rajapaksa

    3. Other Reasons.

  • 2

    Dr. Rameez explores attentive findings of voting behavior of the Sri Lanka society in the 2015 general election. Anyhow, 21 Muslim representatives should work for the betterment of their community which highlighted in the comments and questions of Dr.Rifai.

    • 1

      Like Dr. Rifai I too not happy about the number of Muslim MP’s in the Parliament if they do not stand together irrespective of Party colours during the times of crises (for eg.Aluthgame/Beruwela incident)and difficulties.

      Only Rishad Badiudeen and Azaath Sally stood up and came to the rescue of the Muslims.Certain Muslim politicians turned blind eye.Most notorious is Azwer.I repeat it is not numbers but their dedication for the community.atleast take a lesson from TNA members.Respected Tamil politician Mr.Sambandan spoke in support of the Muslims in the Parliament during the crisis time.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.