14 October, 2019

Blog

Sri Lanka Accepts UPR Recommendation For Accountability Mechanism With Special Counsel

By Sanja De Silva Jayatilleka

Sanja De Silva Jayatilleka

Following Sri Lanka’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR) held at the Human Rights Councils in Geneva on the 15th of November 2017, and the adoption of its Report on the 24th, a draft outcome document called “Draft report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review”, which includes recommendations was circulated in the Council on Friday, the 24th November 2017.

Recommendations are made by UN member states on measures that can be taken to improve the human rights situation in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka has the three options of accepting, rejecting or taking note of those recommendations. 

While it was stated during the debate in Parliament on the Foreign Ministry budget that officials of the Foreign Ministry are of the view that Lord Naseby’s recent revelations on the casualty figures had not been used thus far because they feel that the evidence he unearthed should be used optimally in the most appropriate forums, it is unclear how the UN Human Rights Council did not qualify especially during a universal review by all UN member states of Sri Lanka’s Human Rights Situation, especially since there were several references to Resolution 30/1 during the review.

Listed below are some of the recommendations that the Govt. delegation has accepted on behalf of Sri Lanka:

(The figures on the left refers to the number allocated to each recommendation)

116.70. Guarantee completion of ongoing investigations into abuse committed against civilian population during the civil war (France)

16.73. Hold security forces and government officials accountable for human rights violations and abuses (United States of America)

116.74. Deepen investigation of cases of human rights violations committed during the conflict, punish the perpetrators and provide adequate reparation to the victims (Argentina)

116.76. Fulfil all the commitments made on transitional justice, including through the creation of an accountability mechanism which is credible, victim-centric and supported by international practitioners and through full operationalization of independent and impartial work of the recently established Office of missing persons (Slovenia)

116.77. Establish comprehensive transitional justice mechanism, including operationalizing of an Office of Missing Persons, a truth-seeking commission, an Office of Reparations and a judicial mechanism with a special counsel as committed to (South Africa)

116.90. Fully implement the commitments agreed to in Human Rights Council resolution 30/1 (United States of America)

116.91. Fully implement its commitments under Human Rights Council resolution 30/1(Australia)

116.130. Strengthen the democratic control of the defence sector, in particular suspend the involvement of members of the armed forces in economic activities, in order to ensure guarantee of property of citizens, as well as their livelihoods (Switzerland)

116.131. Accelerate the restitution of lands confiscated by the army and set up a satisfactory compensation system (France)

Given below are some of the recommendations that the Sri Lankan delegation have exercised the option of ‘noting’ rather than ‘rejecting’:

117.36. Take comprehensive measures to ensure that the alleged war crimes and other human rights violations committed during the internal conflict are investigated and prosecuted with the aim to end impunity (Estonia)

117.37. Expedite the ongoing process and establish a clear timeline to establish a truth-seeking commission and an Office on Reparations as well as a special court to investigate allegations of serious human rights violations (Republic of Korea)

117.39. Develop a clear timeline and benchmarks for the full implementation of Sri Lanka’s commitments under Human Rights Council Resolution 30/1 (Germany)

117.40. Develop a clear timeline and benchmarks for the full implementation of its commitments in Human Rights Council resolution 30/1 (Norway)

117.41. Develop an unambiguous timeline accompanied with a monitoring framework for the full implementation of its commitments under Human Rights Council resolution 30/1 (The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia)

117.42. Act on its commitments in Human Rights Council Resolution 30/1 including to establish transitional justice mechanisms, and to establish a clear timeline to this end (Austria)

117.43. Develop a clear timeline and benchmarks for the full implementation of Human Rights Council resolution 30/1 (Denmark)

117.44. Foster reconciliation through accelerated implementation of Human Rights Council resolution 30/1, including by launching the Office of Missing Persons, ending military involvement in civilian functions, returning lands to civilian owners, and establishing a judicial mechanism with the participation of foreign investigators, prosecutors and judges (Canada)

117.45. Fully implement the recommendations of the Consultative Task Force on Reconciliation, including to repeal the Prevention of Terrorism Act and replace it with international best practice legislation (Australia)

There were several Voluntary pledges and commitments made by Sri Lanka including to “Fulfill commitments contained in United Nations Human Rights Council Resolution 30/1 towards the operationalization of the Office on Missing Persons, and the establishment of a truth seeking commission, an office for reparations, and a judicial mechanism with a special counsel.”

At its next UPR and other sessions of the Human Rights Council, Sri Lanka will be reviewed on its progress on the recommendations that it has accepted.

While ‘noting’ does not commit Sri Lanka to implementing the recommendations so noted, it is surprising that given the stand that President Sirisena has publicly taken on the issues, the recommendations for ‘timelines’ and ‘the participation of foreign investigators and prosecutors and judges’ have not been rejected by Sri Lanka.

The delegation to the UPR was headed by Hon. (Dr.) Harsha de Silva, MP Deputy Minister of National Policies and Economic Affairs and comprised of the following members:

Mr. Prasad Kariyawasam, Secretary to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs;

H.E. Mr. Ravinatha Aryasinha, Ambassador and Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the United Nations in Geneva;

Mr. Nerin Pulle, Deputy Solicitor General, Attorney General’s Department;

Mrs. Samantha Jayasuriya, Deputy Permanent Representative, Permanent Mission of Sri Lanka in Geneva;

Ms. Mahishini Colonne, Director General/ UN, US, Canada, Ministry of Foreign Affairs;

Ms. Chandima Wickramasinghe, Senior Assistant Secretary to the President;

Mr. Gehan Gunatilleke, Consultant to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs;

Ms. Shashika Somaratne, Minister Counsellor, Permanent Mission of Sri Lanka in Geneva;

Ms. Mafusa Lafir, First Secretary, Permanent Mission of Sri Lanka in Geneva;

Ms. Dulmini Dahanayake, Second Secretary, Permanent Mission of Sri Lanka in Geneva;

Ms. Nethmini Medawela, Research and Coordination Assistant, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 5
    3

    What are your credentials to write about politics?

    • 4
      1

      VaginalProphet

      The delegation was headed by a self confessed Sinhala/Buddhist and a proud Southerner Harsha de Silva and a token Muslim/Arab Mafusa L:afir. Where were the representatives of other communities?

      By the way the Film Director, public racist Rear Admiral Sarath Weerasekera was seen loitering in the UN lobby. What was he doing there? Was he on a location scouting for his next film?

      • 0
        0

        Tamil vedda
        Did you not know that 1 Sinhala equals 4 demala ? So we have Harsha who could be considered as 4 Tamils in the delegation.Got it?

    • 0
      0

      Vaginal prophet
      Then what about the action of your labia majora?

  • 0
    2

    Sanja De Silva Jayatillaka
    Thank you for the enormous work you have put into and the trouble you have taken to tell us as to who were in the delegation and what were ‘noted’ by the delegation.
    We suspect that you do not agree with what the delegation noted and also the composition of the delegation.
    Please tell us as to who should have been in the delegation – led by? Should they have rejected the UPR outright?

    • 2
      0

      K Pillai

      Are you disappointed with the composition of delegation?

    • 0
      2

      Dear Author and all participants,
      It is indeed disgusting to see Sri Lankans not thanking and working with well meaning UN and genuinely helping Countries. How come no Sri Lankan top executive is responsible enough to work for the sake of their own Country? They readily surrender the Country to opportunist Countries, but never work with Countries offering genuine help. If the Country is allowed to defy all norms of justice and human relations, the UN and the international community is promoting Sri Lanka in continuing its impunity, inhuman violence against minorities and injustice for victims. Are you all getting ready to turn Sri Lanka into another Myanmar.?

  • 0
    0

    The author’s essay highlights the betrayal of the Sinhala people by the YAHAPALANAYAS. Those in the delegation should be noted as traitors who will sell their birthright just to go an overseas trip. Harsha pretends to be an economist which he is NOT. He is just a statistician with a dubious post graduate qualification and cannot engage in a serious discussion because he simply lacks intelligence.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.