26 October, 2021

Blog

Sri Lanka Govt Shuns Reconciliation With Move To Annul Constitutional Provisions

By J. S. Tissainayagam

J.S. Tissainayagam

The government of Sri Lanka is leaving no stone unturned in an attempt to annul provisions of  the country’s constitution that are key to implementing post-war reconciliation. By seeking to rescind the 13th amendment, long held by the international community as the starting point for a political solution for the conflict between Sinhalese and Tamils, the Government has clearly demonstrated its cavalier disregard to UN resolutions and international treaties and therefore is an unreliable international actor.

A spokesperson to India’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs was candid when he said, “[t]he proposed changes raised doubts about the commitments made by the Sri Lankan government to India and the international community, including the United Nations, on a political settlement in Sri Lanka that would go beyond the 13th Amendment.”

The 13th amendment to Sri Lanka’s constitution was introduced as an instrument to share power between the Sinhalese and Tamils through devolution to the country’s provinces. The amendment flowed from the Indo-Lanka Accord, negotiated and signed as a treaty between the governments of India and Sri Lanka in 1987, in a bid to end the armed struggle between rebels supported by India and the Sri Lanka government.

Devolution to share power between Sinhalese and Tamils was to soon encounter snags. The fundamental reason was that Tamils realised that devolution proposed under the 13th amendment would be hobbled by the very thing it was supposed dismantle – power wielded in Sri Lanka’s legislature by Sinhalese members of parliament.

This constraint was due to the unitary character of the Sri Lankan state. This means that the central government, in which the executive presidency and parliament are key institutions, remains constitutionally supreme. Under a unitary system even when power to legislate over subjects of local importance is devolved to subunits such as provinces, parliament can override those powers either by a simple majority or a two-third majority. This contrasts with federal constitutions where powers that the constituting units enjoy are so entrenched that they cannot be tampered with by central governments so simply. Needless to say in the real world constitutions mostly fall in between the unitary-federal continuum.

Despite devolution under the 13th amendment being hobbled by control from the central parliament, most of the Tamil political parties and armed rebel groups accepted the Accord and the brand of power sharing it proposed. Despite backing by Colombo and New Delhi, devolution to the PCs under the 13th amendment, which became law in 1988, was only implemented selectively. For instance, elections to the Northern Provincial Council (NPC) where a majority of Tamils live, was never held. Second, a clause to merge the Eastern PC which has over 60% Tamils and Tamil-speaking Muslims with the NPC to strengthen common demands was temporarily implemented but later struck down by the Supreme Count as unconstitutional.

Following the military defeat of the LTTE in May 2009, devolution of power came back into currency as a practical mechanism of devolving power and thereby promoting reconciliation between the Tamils and Sinhalese. At the same time the international community – especially India and the US – expanded their role in promoting conflict resolution in Sri Lanka.

Citing the provisions of the Accord, the treaty between Sri Lanka and India, New Delhi called for the full implementation of the 13th amendment, which was echoed by the US and other sections of the international community. But buoyed by its military victory and elements of Sinhala nationalist elites, the Sri Lankan government prevaricated. Following three years of intensifying misery for the Tamils due to militarisation, widespread allegations of disappearances, torture and rape, loss of livelihood and parlous conditions of resettled IDPs, the United States moved two resolutions in the UN Human Rights Council. The second resolution, adopted in March this year, “welcomed” provincial elections for the NPC.

Faced with mounting international pressure the government has indicated its intention to hold polls for the NPC this year, although it is yet to be officially announced at the time of writing. However fearing that such elections would strengthen the Tamils in the North the government has on the backs of Sinhala nationalist groups begun to demand dismantling of even the vestiges of devolved governance. It has therefore proposed a 19th amendment to ensure that provincial governance is in name only. The government’s group of Sinhala representatives in Parliament is expected to back this bill and pass it with ease.

The Sri Lankan government’s move to dilute the 13th amendment only reiterates its indifference to reconciliation. It also shows up very clearly the inadequacies in the strategy of the international community. The international community expects Colombo to respect international laws or conventions – such as UN resolutions and treaties – and that meaningful sharing of power will come from within Sri Lanka under the present political structures. But that is not forthcoming. The international community should therefore strengthen the Tamils within and outside Sri Lanka and use other diplomatic tools available to it to resolve the Sri Lankan conflict. A delay will only exacerbate Tamil desperation and see a further erosion of international order.

J. S. Tissainayagam, a former Sri Lankan political prisoner, was a Nieman Fellow in Journalism at Harvard and Reagan-Fascell Fellow at the National Endowment for Democracy in the United States. This article first appeared in Asian Correspondent

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 1
    0

    Tissainayagam,

    All Sri Lankan regimes since independence have denied or tried to obstruct any benefit accruing to Tamils. Tamils didn’t even get a fair share of the Tsunami assistance provided by the Global donors, though Tamils were one of the most affected community. Convenient excuses are provided to the rulers by the Sinhala Buddhist extremists to scuttle any rightful benefit to Tamils. The trend continues to date with vengeance.

    As you put it, the international community has the duty to realize even at this late stage, after the massacre of more than 100 thousand innocent Tamils (men, women and children), and formulate a just solution to the salvation of the minority Tamil nation in the island of Sri Lanka.

    Otherwise the ongoing genocide will annihilate Tamils in their ancestral land where they lived for more then two and a half millenniums.

    Let the truth be known to the outside world.

    • 0
      0

      Clear and to the point analysis. Thissanayagam clearly shows that Mahinda Rajapakse is a LIAR whose word is not worth 2 cents.

      The Rajapakse regime is corrupt and wants to centralize power and concentrate it in the hands of the Rajapakse family and does NOT and will NOT share power with ANYONE – minorities or the majority of Lankan people.

      Time for India to quit playing games and pull the plug on Rajapassa military dictatorship before it is too late. First thing that India must do is to ABORT CHOGM in Lanka which will boost Lanka’s military dictatorship. Then, take back Kachchtivu Island and deny him the claim that he is king of Lanka – Rajapassa can go weeping to the Chinese but there is little that they can do since Lanka is clearly in India’s habitat!

    • 0
      0

      Tamils never got their “fair share” and never will. Leave Sri Lanka and go to USA as he did. Wise man. Left SL without suffering indignity. Why other Tamils don’t have such dignity?

  • 0
    0

    As usual well stated.

    As for sharing Tsunami Donations, MR could have done better, as is
    revealed here:-

    http://www.thesundayleader.lk/20050703/spotlight.htm

  • 0
    0

    J. S. Tissainayagam is a LTTE supporter who lived in Colombo. When he [Edited out]

    So, what else he can do. He is back to where he was.

    • 1
      0

      Tissanayagam was not a terrorist, nor was he an LTTE supporter. He was unjustly charged and fixed by the system. If you read the judgement you will see how hard the judge tried to arrive at a guilty verdict. Not satisfied with that the jail term was over 20 years! There was a lot of injustice that took place, and still does infact. You and I are unaffected, but some families have been devastated. As a Buddhist I feel for them, hence this point of view.

  • 0
    0

    There were many people like tissanayagam while enjoying the Sinhala – hospitality who [Edited out]

    for some reason he was not caught in advance.

  • 1
    0

    The sincerity of the govt with regard to the claims of a humanitarian war and freeing the tamils from the LTTE will be put test with regard to 13A. 13A has been applied to the 8 out of 9 provinces for 24 years. So why not for the NPC?

    A question which the govt is hard put to answer other than by branding the TNA as a terrorist entity. How come the TNA is represented in the EPC and parliment? If it be a terrorist entity govt should ban its existance. So the current moves are nothing but pandering to the demands of a rabid ethno-facist minority who parade in the garb of race and religon.

  • 0
    0

    Muliyawaikkal

    Why other Tamils don’t have such dignity?

    Timely question.

    Why Sinhalese and Buddhists don’t have such dignity to leave this island and go back to their ancestral homeland, Bihar or Tamilnadu?

    My people can have a dignified living in this island.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.