5 April, 2020

Blog

Sri Lanka’s Ongoing Shift To Authoritarianism Under Rajapaksa And His Cronies

By Neil DeVotta

Dr. Neil DeVotta

One word that is increasingly mentioned when discussing contemporary Sri Lanka is “authoritarianism.” This is primarily due to President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s frittering away of citizens’ civil liberties even as he and his “First Family” arrogate power and—together with their close relatives, cronies, and supporters—govern extra-constitutionally and extrajudicially. The malpractices were tolerated, even justified as necessary, during the war against the separatist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). That war, however, ended in brutal and controversial fashion in May 2009, with the military accused of committing war crimes during the final campaign. Since then, the Sri Lankan government has vociferously castigated the United Nations and western countries for demanding accountability for those alleged crimes. In addition, the government has also deliberately undermined reconciliation with the Tamil minority, while simultaneously manipulating a climate of Sinhalese Buddhist triumphalism to further strengthen the executive’s powers.

On the subject of political reform, Rajapaksa’s government discarded the 17th Amendment of the Constitution—which created a Constitutional Council with powers to appoint and dismiss independent commissioners overseeing elections, public services, police, human rights, finance, bribery and corruption, and the judiciary—and instead rammed through the 18th Amendment, which effectively puts the president in charge of appointing these commissioners, while also eliminating presidential term limits. The latter permits Rajapaksa to run for a third term and fashion a milieu conducive to creating a political dynasty. Sri Lanka’s 1978 constitution enabled a powerful executive with minimal checks and balances. This combined with the gruesome civil war allowed presidents to stretch their powers, and Mahinda Rajapaksa has done so to every degree. Indeed, politicians, bureaucrats, media, business, and civil society are so cowed and weakened under Rajapaksa that Sri Lanka today is more of a pseudo democracy—one that is rife with nepotism, corruption, sabotaged political and bureaucratic institutions, weak rule of law, and a culture of impunity among the elites. Furthermore, the Sri Lankan military has not been demobilized since the end of the civil war, instead it is venturing into civilian commercial projects in ways that undermine fair business practices.

A compromised judiciary that occasionally stood up to politicians was considered the only entity able to check the regime’s authoritarian rampage. This expectation is now questionable, given the impeachment in January this year of Shirani Bandaranayake, the country’s first female chief justice. Executive meddling has long politicized and corrupted Sri Lanka’s courts system. “Telephone justice,” whereby the attorney general’s or president’s office calls judges and tells them how to rule in particular cases, is rumored to be common right up to the Supreme Court. In return, individual judge’s unethical and otherwise illegal transactions are tolerated. Pliant justices are also rewarded with perks and their family members showered with sinecures—usually high-ranking positions in state corporations. Impeached Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake’s husband, for example, was made Chairman of the National Savings Bank despite a controversial tenure at the Sri Lanka Insurance Corporation. It was widely recognized that his appointment was related to her position on the Supreme Court.

President Rajapaksa appointed Shirani Bandaranayake chief justice in May, 2011. She, like her predecessors and fellow justices, contributed to court rulings that have strengthened the executive presidency. Yet, when one of her decisions upset the First Family, a Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) comprised of politicians from the ruling coalition found her guilty of financial and official misconduct and recommended impeachment—despite the Supreme Court ruling that the PSC had no right to investigate a senior judge and the Appeals Court ordering parliament to abandon the impeachment process. Civil society organizations, clergy members, foreign governments, and various international bodies likewise objected strenuously. The president’s reaction was to summarily sign the order removing Mrs. Bandaranayake, even as pro-government thugs brandishing poles gathered outside her official residence to celebrate the presidential ruling and intimidate her—lest she refused to give up her post. Their actions were consistent with recent attacks against those associated with the judiciary, including an assault on the Judiciary Service Commission secretary after he complained about executive interference in the courts; members of Sri Lanka’s Bar Association being issued death threats; and prominent lawyers who protested vocally against the Chief Justice’s impeachment receiving threatening letters from a secret group identifying itself as the Patriotic Front.

The episode that caused the rift between the First Family and Chief Justice Bandaranayake was the government’s attempt to create a Divinegume (Improving Lives) department, which amalgamates the operations of three extant entities under the authority of the current Minister of Economic Development Basil Rajapaksa, who coincidently is a brother of Mahinda Rajapaksa. Another presidential sibling, Gotabaya, oversees the Ministry of Defense and a third brother, Chamal, is Speaker of Parliament; combined, the Rajapaksa family controls nearly 70 percent of Sri Lanka’s budget. The Divinegume program is designed to give Basil Rajapaksa an additional $600 million for development and low income households with hardly any oversight, thereby effectively expanding the First Family’s patronage system. Indeed, the bill sanctioning the program contains a secrecy clause that prohibits Divinegume department personnel from divulging any information associated with its operations. The Supreme Court’s ruling that the bill violated aspects of the constitution is what led to the dismissal of Mrs. Bandaranayake.

Successive presidents have often promoted personnel from the Attorney General’s office to the higher courts, resulting in a judiciary that harbors an “executive mindset.” This troubling phenomenon is best illustrated by Mohan Pieris, the person chosen in January to replace Shirani Bandaranayake. Peiris, like Bandaranayake, has not served as a judge. Instead, he has spent much of his professional career working for the Attorney General’s office as a State Counsel and later as a Senior State Counsel. He also served as a legal consultant to the Ministry of Defense before being made Attorney General in 2008. He was serving as legal consultant to the cabinet when chosen to be the Chief Justice. Peiris has been accused of misleading—on the government’s behalf—a United Nations investigation into the whereabouts of a disappeared journalist and few believe he can operate independently as Chief Justice. General Sarath Fonseka was the army commander who finally defeated the LTTE, and he later ran, unsuccessfully, against Mahinda Rajapaksa in the last presidential election. Following the election, Fonseka, the national war hero, was dragged out of his office, charged with corruption, and ultimately jailed for over two years. The message communicated to Sri Lankans was a simple one: if the army chief who defeated the LTTE could be thus humiliated, no one is immune. Mrs. Bandaranayake’s impeachment has now sent a similar message to the judiciary.

It is instructive that governing coalition parliamentarians affirmed their willingness to abandon Mrs. Bandaranayake by signing a blank sheet of paper devoid of the impeachment motion. With governing politicians so servile, the country’s opposition impotent, the media muzzled, civil society persecuted, and judiciary intimidated, Sri Lanka is clearly moving towards an entrenched brand of political authoritarianism under Mahinda Rajapaksa and his cronies. As presidential sibling Basil Rajapaksa proclaimed to The Economist in November 2010, “an era of ‘ruler kings’ has begun.”

*Neil DeVotta is an Associate Professor in the Department of Politics and International Affairs at Wake Forest
University. He can be contacted via email at devottn@wfu.edu. Courtesy Asia Pacific Bulletin  East-West Center

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    0

    We have Cabral, Mohan Peiris, Nalaka Godahewa, Gamini Senarath, Razik Zarook,all the presidents men occupying sensitive positions. Then of course the Rajapakse quartet in overall control.

  • 0
    0

    What is unfolding is a consequences of the habits learned starting with the 1952 Hartal and ending with the the last war. The mess that the politicians made were at many stages sorted out by using the military. In the last episode of this phenomenon the armed forces no doubt rescued this country from disintegration. The JVP and LTTE phenomenon were also armed insurrections of an increasingly sophisticated nature. It is the gun that provided legitimacy to them. Militarism and the associated authoritarianism and regimentation have become bad habits in this country. Only a wise ruler can lead the country out of this quagmire. Unfortunately, the present government led by Mahinda Rajapakse is not capable of doing it, because they unfortunately think it is a mindset that can get things done, regardless of whether the objectives are right or wrong. A week, docile and politically naive national polity, is permitting this mindset and phenomenon to take root.

    Deploying the army in nation building tasks in the immediate or short term, in the after a war is a necessity. However, it should not be institutionalised.

    Dr.Rajasingham Narendran

    • 0
      0

      Continuation of previous comment:

      The crony phenomenon is a natural extension of the authoritarian attitude of militarism. The ruler’s wishes have to be fulfilled without question. Implicit and unquestioned obedience to the superiors from the top to the bottom of the hierarchy has to be the order of the day. Efficiency and capability are not important factors when militarism is brought into play in politics. In Sri Lanka everything has been overtly politicised over the years. Cronyism, nepotism, corruption, favouritism and family bandyism have to naturally become the pillars on which such a system can be built and sustained.

      Dr. Rajasingham Narendran

    • 0
      0

      Doctor, your diagnosis seems to be sound. But the medicine – a wise ruler? – I wouldn’t we so sure. By the way, why you always insist on calling yourself a Dr. It makes all of us, the readers, feel rather sick.

      • 0
        0

        He is not a real doctor..completed his degree in Russia with Mahinda R.

      • 0
        0

        Away,

        I use my full name and the title I am entitled to use. This is what I am known ( name plus title) as for the past 35 years. I have no cause hide my identity. I am sorry I am not entitled or authorised to prescribe medicines for you and the ‘ All’ you refer to, because I am Veterinarian and a Ph.D in applied physiology. Please seek appropriate medical help soon.

        Dr.Rajasingham Narendran.

        • 0
          0

          Thanks for clarifying, I already feel better. Now I know you are the Ph.D guy who is doing great work, and I think we probably met at some kind of meeting in Colombo a few years ago. My problem is with medical doctors. I have had some pretty nasty experiences with them in the past.

  • 0
    0

    The writer is not writing as a political scientist, but unfortunately as a politician. This is the same political rhetoric we find in much of the current mediocre journalism on developments in Sri Lanka. The writer doesn’t mention – let alone explain – the enormous popularity of the President among an overwhelming majority of ordinary Sri Lankans despite the much rehearsed litany of woes of Rajapakse rule that he regurgitates which are “true” as in half-truths. The writer should avoid the “talking points” fashionable today in misinformed or misinforming western media promoting the geopolitical interests of their corporate and political masters if he wants to capture the full picture of what exactly is going on in Sri Lanka.

  • 0
    0

    We have to blame JRJ for creating the Presidency over looking the fact what the out come would be if one day a power crazy lunatic creep into that position. The entire Nation is now paying for that mistake. Looking back, without argument we can say that we had only 3 Statesman who ruled our mother Lanka so far and without reservation they are Late Hon. D.S. & Dudley Senanayake and Sir John Kotalawala. They loved the Country and served the citizens of Sri Lanka not themselves, their families or criminals associated with them. The words corruption, intimidation and murder are relatively unknown and the citizens lived happily. The UN and the International community should help to rediscover our lost democratic Sri Lanka.

  • 0
    0

    This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn’t abide by our Comment policy.For more detail see our Comment policy
    https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/comments-policy-2/

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.