29 November, 2020

Blog

Taking It To The Streets

By Liyanage Amarakeerthi –

Dr.Liyanage Amarakeerthi

Last week, university dons around the country took to the streets asking people to sign a one million-signature petition demanding that the authorities safeguard the state-funded education system of the country. In Kandy, some famous professors and academics from University of Peradeniya turned up in the middle of the city and explained to people why they were asking people to sign the petition. The preamble to the petition reads:

“Education is a primary feature of all human societies today. It is a fundamental human right and a fundamental feature of our democracy. Everyone has the right to education and access to education (Article 26 – Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948). In 1945, education was established as a ‘free’ service, which should be made accessible to all persons irrespective of caste, creed, gender, ethnicity, language and region. This brought about a near social revolution in the country. Free education has provided social mobility to ordinary people; people from all parts of the country. We all need schools of quality for our children. Universities are where so many of our children aspire to go to. It brought about a renaissance in the arts creating a strong sense of belonging among its people in different ways. This system has supported artists, writers, teachers, engineers, doctors, dentists, vets, architects, agriculturalists, entrepreneurs, lawyers, accountants and many more professionals. Education supports all other professional and bureaucratic services contributing to the health of the country.”

Of course, people already knew about most of it. They, however, were visibly startled when they heard the tragic twist at the end of the tale:

“Yet, today, public education is under severe stress from many quarters. We are concerned about current government policy toward education and higher education. From 2005 onwards, government spending on education has been fast decreasing. When the current President came into office, in 2005, the government’s expenditure on education was 2.9% of GDP. Today, it has fallen to a miserable 1.9% of GDP.”

Though I was only known in my own neighbourhood, I was there among those famous professors talking to people. We told them that in terms of GDP allocation to the public education, our country was the lowest in the region. Even Bangladesh, with which we proudly compare and contrast our country, does not allow us to claim that we are better in spending on education. In cricket, most of the time at least, we beat the daylight out of the Bangladeshi team, but that country takes care of its education far better than we do. We like to think that our current President is the best leader we have got after King Dutugemunu, but we told the people that after he came to power, the funding for education had continued to dwindle. Under him, the number of students admitted to universities has gone up while funding has come down! People who were interested in what we had to say stopped and told us about other important things: “Mihin Air,” “Hambantota harbour,” “CSN,” “Rugby,” “white vans,” “a little puppy from from Zurich,””Z-score,” and the like. Then they signed the petition. On the first day alone, we collected thousands of signatures while taking our message to people by talking to them personally.

Professors meeting public

Conversation between ordinary people and academics on the streets has given us an opportunity to re-assess our duty as academics. The Federation of University Teachers’ Association (FUTA) has started this trade union action demanding an almost complete re-thinking on state funded education from primary education to universities. As for universities, the lack of funding, including salaries, has been a major factor bringing the quality of higher education down. In addition, the politicization of the university administration, so evident in how vice chancellors and other administrators are now appointed, has eroded intellectual freedom at universities. It is not that all vice chancellors and administrators are political henchmen but the system is such that any reputed professor now has to seek political patronage to serve in the highest position in a university. This trend of increasing politicization has not only kept some great scholars away from those positions but also allowed some incredibly mediocre people to become vice chancellors of several universities in Sri Lanka. So academics have decided to tell this to people who vote the politicians, responsible for this mess, into power.

When the government engages in any kind of reforms in education and higher education, academics need to know what the proposed reforms are in advance, as we told the general public. But, the method preferred by the current Minister of Higher Education is to ignore the academic community completely. Rather than engaging with the academics and listening to their various arguments on the matters related to education reform, the minister has handpicked some academics willing to toe his line. Yes, there are academics who prefer servitude under powerful ministers to freedom of thought within universities which they should ideally be interested in. In contrast to them, academics on the street told people that we should be party to all discussions on all education reforms.

Meeting People in the Public Space

It was heartening to see how enthusiastic people were to sign the petition. In Kandy, people who happened to be in town for various reasons came to where our table was, to place their signatures. One family made their 10-year-old daughter sign it. The girl even did not know what word “signature” meant. “Write your name again,” the father said. He knew that her future was at stake. Some police officers in uniform signed because they knew that their children needed state-funded schools and universities. And though new police stations have come into existence, hundreds of rural schools have been closed down. We gave them the numbers. In addition, the number of pupils in primary classes at popular schools has become a joke. More than fifty First Graders for a single teacher! This is a gross distortion of the very idea of primary education where close attention and care of the teacher and enough space for play and creativity are the essential conditions for early childhood development. In the streets, we could apprise people of the state of education in our schools.

We are university academics all right. But, we are no longer a privileged minority with a secure life confined to academic ivory towers. The ‘reality principle’ has eaten into our space, driving us to people for whom we are ultimately responsible. As the American philosopher Stanley Cavell once said, if a professor cannot meaningfully converse with a baker, it is the professor’s problem. This trade union action has given us an opportunity to re-learn the art of talking to ordinary people. And we have a new chance to remind ourselves that we are part of the people and that before ‘knowledge’ was professionalized, ‘professor’ was one of them. For example, when early people were taming fire, the ‘scientist’ was there with them as they changed and managed nature. He was not called a ‘scientist’ then. When the study of fire (and all other phenomena) became a professional field, the professors, sadly, were removed from the theatre of life. Now, we are retracing our steps. In addition, in our country there was never an academic tower, ‘ivory’ or otherwise. We just pretended that there was one!

So we are meeting people. The FUTA has decided to visit people in their villages and homes. We have seen enough of NGO-funded civil society people who organise seminars in Colombo, often at fancy hotels, where the cost of a single meal can feed several families in poverty-stricken villages; they have failed and lost their credibility. We academics spend our own money and visit villages that are in fact our ‘home turfs’ before Dr. Kannangara’s free education paved the way for our social mobility. We do not return to those villages to celebrate cliched ‘purity’ which is claimed to exist there but to remind our people that the free education of this country has been the greatest social leveller in recent history, and we collectively need to protect it for posterity.

My long-time inspiration, late professor Edward Said observes that in order to take up the social responsibilities of our time, professionals need to learn how to be amateurs again. Specialisation, argues Said, can make one indifferent to social and political environment which one’s specialised knowledge should serve. Therefore, professionals as responsible intellectuals need to have some sort of amateurism in them.

“The intellectual today ought to be an amateur; someone who considers that to be a thinking, a concerned member of a society one is entitled to raise moral issues at the heart of even the most technical and professionalized activity as it involves one’s country, its power, its mode of interacting with its citizens as well as with other societies. In addition, the intellectual’s spirit as an amateur can enter and transform the merely professional routine most of us go through into something much more lively and radical; instead of doing what one is supposed to do one can ask why one does it, who benefits from it…”

Well said, Professor Said! I would rather be an amateur than a narrowly focused professional. So, going to meet people at their homes will be one last test for us academics on strike. We are more than ready for that!

*The writer teaches literature in the Department of Sinhala, University of Peradeniya

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    0

    BRAVO Amerakirthi! Super piece. Finally the Don’s are speaking up and out – SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER! Connecting the dots and crosses and analyzing the current social reality and social suffering and growing and gaping income inequality in Sri Lanka today – looking beyond Rajapakse’s media SPIN and fairy tales about Lanka having fancy GDP growth rates and per capita incomes. If so, the Dons should be paid accordingly but this is not the case. The figures are fixed at the Central Bank by a clownish criminal to mask the reality of the Rajapkse’ Bros looting of Lanka and de-development of ALL INSTITUTIONS.
    The more power to you and Dons. it is indeed the role of the Don to serve society by keeping the people informed through enlightened analysis of policies, processes, structures and practices and by reaching out to and EDUCATING THE PEOPLE.
    Indeed, you are corretct the NGOs are into the international conference circuits and are the lap dogs of someone else agenda today, so Dons must start the renaissance of civil society in Lanka today. Be of good courage and remember that the people united will never be defeated. We are with you every step of the way – in Lanka and abroad!

    • 0
      0

      Nice to see the lady Profs of Peradeniya are on the street – talking to the people! Where are the Colombo University NGO ladies?! They seem to be sleeping like their friendly NGO ladies who are conferring in 5 star hotels and overseas on foreign funds while living the good life with donor money and sleeping with the [Edited out]
      Also right nice that Peradeniya University, Lanka’s most respected university which produce many internationally famous researchers and scientists are leading the way to restore the respect, dignity and funding to Education. The university is being destroyed by the uneducated Rajapakse brothers who fear educated people, who can think and act critically, and know the truth about them.

      • 0
        0

        The “home grown solution” to Lanka’s home grown “ethnic conflict” that still festers 3 year after war ended will hopefully come from these sensible, educated, broad-minded Dons — leading the way to power-sharing , tolerance and accommodation among all Lanka’s diverse ethnic and religious communities through HOME GROWN REGIME CHANGE! Go forth dear Dons – lead on!

  • 0
    0

    Thanks! Nice work! The Dons are WORKING HARD while on strike to EDUCATE THE PEOPLE IN THE STREETS – a most important task- in the midday heat. They have stepped out of the IVORY TOWER into the streets in the hour of Lanka’s need given the depths to which the country is now sinking with the Rajapakse Brothers who do not have a degree and have not entered a university running and bankrupting Lanka .
    The should also reach out to the students and form a common platform to upgrade the University environment and students lives as well.

    Any student who wishes to help Rajapakse break the FUTA strike by taking FUTA to court had better remember that they are doing a great job while on strike – and working hard to educate the NATION and its PEOPLE!

  • 0
    0

    Good Dons being to street, asking masses support for NATIONAL CAUSE OF EDUCATION OF FOR FUTURE GENERATION SRI LANKA.Fight policies base not individual or personal or family orinted attacks;not target on Regime change of policy of foreign Agenda.Upheald soverginity and democracy of Country and Nation of Island,is duty and responsibility of FUTA.
    Borade base and long-term working level are more important for future politics in the Island.

  • 0
    0

    Without going into politics, let’s look at one fact from this letter.
    Liyanage says,”Bangladesh takes care of its education far better than we do.”

    So Bangladesh spends 2.4% of their GDP while we spend only 1.9%.
    But the population of Bangladesh/SL is 161/20 whereas the per capita GDP is 1700/5600 US dollars.

    That says, Bangladesh spends 40 USD per person (2.4% of 1700 USD) while we spend 106 USD per person (1.9% of 5600).

    One could easily find faults in numbers but hiding behind percentages to justify anything cannot be a just cause.

  • 0
    0

    Fantastic job Amarakeerthi.

    That said and while I agree wholeheatedly of your critiques of fat cat NGOs (and have engaged in wrien skirmishes with fat cat NGO czars), let us also not forget the decent NGOs whose workers, most often do voluntary work and others whose payments are far below the stupendous rates that are paid by the fat cats!

    If your movement is going to be broadbased, lets try and be inclusive and not condemn in generalistic terms.

  • 0
    0

    Dons main point is said to be GoSL allocation for education is 1.9% and this needs to be increased to 6% of our GDP.The above1.9% is only the budgetary allocation while the country spends nearly 5% on actual terms when totaling other sums such as expenses incurred for international and private educational institutions, studies abroad,private tutions,transport concessions etc

  • 0
    0

    @R.Hadirampola
    Sir looks like you miss-understood what they asking.
    please refer to this
    http://www.uis.unesco.org/Library/Documents/eiguide09-en.pdf
    page 20,
    ==============================================
    Definition: Total public expenditure on education (current and capital) expressed as a percentage of the Gross
    National Income (GNI) in a given financial year. GNI is also referred to as Gross National Product (GNP).

    Purpose: This indicator shows the proportion of a country’s wealth generated during a given financial year that has
    been spent by government authorities on education. The indicator can be also calculated based on Gross Domestic
    product (GDP)
    ===============================================

  • 0
    0

    Mr. Vanderkoon,

    lets take your argument further…
    Why compare SL to Bangladesh ….
    Lets compare it to the US…after all that is what the Wonder of Asia (Asiyawe Ashchrya) is aiming for…

    Population US/SL is 314/20 and the Per capita GDP is 49,000/5600 (I don’t see a point in bringing the population when you are using Per Capita GDP.. anyway I will keep it because you did)

    US spends 5.7 % for education and SL 1.9%
    US spends per person 2793 USD and SL 106!!!!!
    Don’t BS my friend….

    % is what should be important… a very poor country like Bangladesh spends as a % more on their citizens than our great country…and the riches country in the world spend a whole lot more (almost 3 times as a percentage) than ours….

    so here are the gross numbers

    Bangladesh 40 population 161 million
    SL 106 20 million
    USA 2793 314 million

    Can you really compare the per person expenditure?

    but GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE OF EDUCATION as a percentage of GDP

    Bangladesh 2.4%
    SL 1.86% (not even 1.9%)
    US 5.7%

    Your 40 to 106 may fool some but not us…

    what about India with a Billion people

    They spend 148 USD per person for education for a billion people!!!!

    So no you are the mister statistics twister…not us…

    The simple truth is

    SL education policy with regard to government spending on education is the worst (except for 8 nations) in the world…

    Face it… accept it… do something about it…

  • 0
    0

    Great article, thanks. Nice photos too, who is the photographer?

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.