12 December, 2019

Blog

The Minority Vote

By Izeth Hussain

Izeth Hussain

Izeth Hussain

The cure for the ills of democracy is more democracy – H.L. Mencken

My confident expectation before the Uva PC elections was that the UPFA would have a “torrid time”, and so it turned out. My confident expectation thereafter was that at the next round of elections the President and the UPFA would be soundly, and deservedly, trounced. The obvious reasons for that expectation are as follows. first of all there is the factor of longevity: in the contemporary world, though not in traditional societies, people want change; combining economic development with equity seems to be practically impossible under the capitalist system, so that a substantial proportion of the electorate can be expected to vote against the UPFA; the dictatorial drive has roused deep anxieties about the recurrence of another doom-laden 1989 if the UPFA continues in power; and the thorough alienation of the minorities should mean that the greater part of 25% of the electorate would vote against the UPFA. On those grounds, it seemed to me, that a sound resounding trouncing of the President and thereafter of the UPFA candidates at General Elections had to be expected.

But of course that expectation could be belied by untoward occurrences. After 1956 our politics have increasingly become politics as “organized hatred”, which had to be expected as increasingly in our politics interests have predominated without any ideals and principles worth talking about. Therefore practically anything can be expected, not excluding even the assassinations of key candidates to queer electoral outcomes. However, at the moment what is worrying for opponents of the UPFA is that the two most important parties representing the Tamils and the Muslims, namely the TNA and the SLMC, are sitting on the fence. It might turn out therefore that the minorities will not be voting massively against the President and the UPFA, who consequently may be able to scrape through.

Sampanthan and Hakeem

Sampanthan and Hakeem

I will first make some observations about the TNA before dealing with the SLMC. Both are minority parties but the dilemmas they face are significantly different. No one in his right mind can imagine even for an instant that the TNA can be supportive of the President and the UPFA. The latter are against the full implementation of 13A, and they seem to be bent on making it largely inoperative even in its truncated form. If they continue in power there will be no political solution on the basis of 13A. Instead the Tamils will continue to be treated as a conquered people who are at the mercy of the Sinhalese conqueror. Some will think that I am being excessive in this critique, but that is beside the point. What is to the point is that there can be no question of the TNA supporting the President and the UPFA at the next round of elections, and the important question that arises concerns the options that are open to the TNA.

It could put up its own candidate for the Presidency, but for obvious reasons that need not be spelt out that would be tantamount to ensuring an election victory for the incumbent President. It could opt to support the Opposition but that would make no sense for at least two reasons. One is that if the TNA comes to an agreement with the Opposition on 13A and on every matter that is of vital interest to the Tamils, we can be certain – in keeping with practice hallowed over several decades – that the new Government will renege on every commitment without the slightest moral scruple. The other reason is that the present Government will start howling that the TNA-Opposition agreement shows that there is a secret understanding – backed by the Western powers – about setting up Eelam. That has to be expected because of the savage stupidity that is at the core of our politics these days. The ugly fact is that TNA support for the Opposition could turn out to be a lethal embrace. A further option for the TNA is to keep quiet, to choose neither side, leaving it to the Tamil voter to decide how to vote. But that could mean mass Tamil abstentions resulting – as in 2005 – in victory for the incumbent President.

I suggest that there is one way out of the dilemma facing the TNA and the Tamils: to vote for the Opposition because it stands for democracy which is the essential prerequisite for solving the Tamil ethnic problem. There are two ways in which a political solution for the Tamils can be reached. One is through an understanding between the Government, the TNA and other Parties representing the Tamils, and the Indian Government about the implementation of 13A. Such an agreement would be inconceivable with President Rajapaksa and the UPFA Government, but it might be possible with a new Government. The other is through an incremental organic process whereby the Tamils come to be seen as having fair and equal treatment, and that would be possible only through a fully functioning democracy. The crucial point is this: even agreement on devolution going beyond 13A would amount to nothing in the absence of a fully functioning democracy to ensure its application. A new Government could conceivably move towards a fully functioning democracy whereas President Rajapaksa and the UPFA can only be expected to continue even more fiercely their racist neo-Fascist drive. There is therefore a sound case for the TNA to support the Opposition on the ground of democracy alone without bothering about 13A for the time being.

As for the Muslim vote, I will limit myself here to making just one essential clarification. The SLMC leader Rauff Hakeem is seen as sitting on the fence, which is taken as typifying the self-seeking, unscrupulous, unprincipled behavior of Muslim politicians as a whole. Our veteran Muslim journalist, Latheef Farook, has recently written a splendidly eloquent denunciation of such Muslim politicians. I myself have done so in the past, making the point that the typical Muslim politician is not the representative of the Muslims to the Government but of the Government to the Muslims, and I have even argued, quite seriously, that the Muslims would be better off represented by Sinhalese politicians.

But the times they are a-changing, and some Muslim politicians have been courageously outspoken over the anti-Muslim campaign though most of them evidently continue to believe that the best way of serving Muslim interests is by polishing the boot of Sinhalese power. Azath Salley spoke out some time ago and was jailed though only briefly; the message being that the next time the punishment could be much more drastic, possibly even fatal. But others also spoke out, notably Rauff Hakeem and Rishard Bathiudeen. The latter has opted to stay with the Government while RH might still do so. What is the explanation? I believe that it arises from the fact that there are no ideals and principles worth talking about in our politics; there are only interests, and the only legitimate question is whether or not those interests are legitimate. The crux of the matter is that it is the Government of the day that is best situated to satisfy those interests. The Muslim politicians who continue to side with the Government evidently believe that it will scrape through at the elections, and therefore the best interests of the Muslims, not just their personal interests, require that they continue to support it.

However, we can draw an important lesson from the Uva PC elections. The Muslims voted heavily against the UPFA, showing that they will not submit to dictation by their politicians. It has to be expected therefore that at the forthcoming Presidential and Parliamentary elections the Muslims will go along with the Sinhalese and Tamils who are working towards a better Sri Lanka based on a fully functioning democracy.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 7
    0

    Izeth Hussain –

    RE:The Minority Vote

    The issues in tgis election are.

    1. Dictatorship Vs, Democracy

    2. Family Dictatorship and stealing of the National Wealth for One-Family Dynasty

    3. Law and Order

    4. Good Governance.

    These are all common to All Communities.

    This needs to be pinted out by the Common Sense Phamplet.

    Sri Lanka lacks writers who can write a Common Sense Phamplet unlike the pre-USA. of 1776.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Sense_%28pamphlet%29

    Herding Sri Lankan writers to write a small commons sense pamphlet is like herdong Cattle…

    [Edited out]

    • 0
      5

      The issues in this election identified by “Amarasiri” and the proposed solutions are.
      1. Dictatorship Vs, Democracy – create chaos by electing a hodgepodge of loosers
      2. Family Dictatorship and stealing of the National Wealth for One-Family Dynasty – Elect the proxy of corrupt Raudra Rajina Chandrika
      3. Law and Order – Pull MR out of Temple Trees on 9 jan, Shut down the Katunayake airport and handover the law to “brother Dudley”
      4. Good Governance – remove the army from the North, bring back Fonseks and Shirani B (so that she can release her husband of corruption) and appoint Ranil penda PM.

      Should we say more?

      These deranged comments writers, Chandrika shills, Amarasiri, Javi and Taraki’s mentor will go to hell on 9 Jan, drinking bile on the way.

      • 5
        0

        “”These deranged comments writers, Chandrika shills, Amarasiri, Javi “”

        Gandaya Koon,

        landa funda madalanda london/new york calling!!

        Why do you have to continuously change your email address (icon change)??
        Is it because you were born of lying lions like a Buro??

        So you have jumped into the washing machine for cheating chetty no jatti??

        Well black mamba ganda gunda koon is sure to become wash & werewolf.

        Walking Owl, have you heard it fart?? next time over.

  • 7
    0

    The muslims will never vote for the incumbent President, Even with or without RB or RH they will vote for the opposition candidate as they’re in great doubt that they fear the UFPA will bring even more violence against the minority by unleashing the ultra-nationalism such as BBS and will destroy their rights and property which will cause instability of their daily life.

    Therefore, In my opinion i’m 100% certain that they’ll turn against the incumbent President, But they would surely go for the opposition candidate. Furthermore I have seen that opposition candidate is nowadays so popular in my area where i have heard of the people talking about the opposition candidate even i spoke to few communities which includes Buddhism, Christians and Muslims where they claim to confident the victory of Maithripala Sirisena, while small number of people say Mahinda will win for a certain reason which includes; War Victory 2009, Road Development, governmental benefit (motorbikes and low interest loans).

    Mahinda will try full till the last breath at the election by violating the laws, blackmailing the opposition voters and block the votes for the opposition candidate. In my position I still feel these type of thuggery and bribery will lead more violence after the election result announcement; this will cause destabilisation of the economy and the heading toward to the dictatorship for the Rajapaksas, Where they will obtain maximum control of countrywide, corruption, nepotism and manslaughter the minorities.

    The people has to think twice before voting for the Mahinda’s government. Vote for democracy or vote for destabilisation of economy.

  • 4
    2

    Yes you can write article and Colombo telegraph can publish but voters have rights to decide themselves vote and not to vote or who to vote this is the democratic way
    You must think out side the box

    • 1
      2

      Well said pasel

      Hussain’s Muslim Vote will not be needed this timeanyway, by the looks of things. Saw the Tamil response to MR at Mullativu and Killinochchi?

      The Sinhala-Tamil unity is going to re-elect MR with a thundering majority this time so that Thoppi karayo like Hakim and Sally will be made irrelevant.

      So Hussain, get ready to write another 1500 series of articles of bogus Muslim grievences. And handovr Bambalapitiya and Kollupitiya to majority rule again.

      • 1
        0

        Sinhala-Tamil unity?When did that happen?
        Wellawatte already under majority?No interest
        in Chinafort-Beruwala?

    • 3
      0

      Pasel

      “Yes you can write article and Colombo telegraph can publish but voters have rights to decide themselves vote and not to vote or who to vote this is the democratic way”

      Do the stupid people make informed choices?

  • 3
    0

    The picture painted in this article with regard to the TNA and the Tamils seem to be perfect but not so the picture with regard to the Muslims. The chances that the Muslims will vote against the government irrespective of the stand taken by their leaders.

    Sengodan. M

  • 0
    0

    Mahinda loss the Muslim vote when he arrogantly stated that they do not need it it, using a very derogatory word when describing them. The majority Muslims are turned off the Rajapaksa’s after they displayed their preference to safeguard their saffron thugs, and remained indifferent when Muslims were attacked and killed in Aluthgama. The mere fact that the Goat man opened their offices shows insensitivity and disregard for the feelings of the minority. Many Muslims opened their eyes, and became realistic to the fact that in Rajapaksa land, minorities and their lives, businesses, and homes, are of no consequence.

    What is Hakeem and other useless Muslim leaders still waiting for?

  • 1
    1

    Until, if ever, the Sinhalese-Buddhist electorate comes of age, the battle for the Presidency will always be a battle between two Sinhala-Buddhists.

    The Tamils, Muslims and our smaller ‘minority’ groups should vote en masse for the challenger. There is a high probability that the ‘minority’ vote will tip the scales this time.

    A vote for the challenger is a vote for HOPE; a vote for the incumbent MR is simply affirmation that things can go on in the same old way.

    Go Minorities!

  • 0
    0

    This article concentrates on Tamils and Muslims. Christians are also a minority in SL. If MR cared about the Christians in SL, he would not have called for an unwanted, illegal election at a time the Christians are preparing to celebrate and commemorate the birth of their Saviour, Jesus Christ. He invited the Pope to the country to use that to his benefit as well. Had the Cardinal been guided by the Holy Spirit, a person of suc ill-repute should not have been granted an audience with His Holiness. All Christians in SL, use your vote wisely and send this tyrant/maniac home!

    • 0
      0

      Rajapakse will try to blackmail (doctored photographs) the Pope to force him to “order” the Christians to vote UPFA.

      • 0
        0

        stop giving ideas to bal_tic tic buruvas. just observe and say the ++ thinge.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.