22 July, 2017

Towards Sri Lankan Queer Liberation: A Global-Sri Lankan Reflection For Pride 2017

By Chamindra Weerawardhana

Dr. Chamindra Weerawardhana

In this festive period of Pride celebrations across the world, a peculiar incident takes place in Sri Lanka, with increased mobilisation of the Buddhist monks, who are apparently opposed to the proposed new Constitution. The multitude of disagreements on the Constitution, and especially on what goes in the Constitution within the Joint Government itself have repeatedly come to light. Debates that are necessary and somewhat intriguing are taking place, which is just about the only positive sign.

On 4th July 2017, academic and diplomat Dr Dayan Jayatilleka published an article in defence of the Justice Minister (given the Justice Minister’s publicly expressed hatred of Sri Lanka’s LGBTIQA community – yes, let that sink in – LGBTQIA people who are Sri Lankan nationals, including this writer, his name will not be mentioned in this article). The following passage provides for an interesting reading:

[I quote]

These rootless cosmopolitan civil society caucuses have a disproportionate influence not only on but in the Government and government policy. Their heroes and heroines are Prime Minister Wickremesinghe, ex-Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera and ex-President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga. It is these NGO networks, their expatriate backup and their handlers in foreign capitals near and far, and Colombo based Embassies and High Commissions, who have cheered on a so-called “reform agenda” which has caused a situation in which this deadlocked government is sinking in a quagmire, assailed on every front every day, by semi-spontaneous public agitation. Individual Ministers are besieged by increasingly angry crowds.      

These caucuses, whether they know it or not, objectively serve foreign and anti-Sri Lankan interests. They have given the Government a profile similar to that which the UNP was depicted as possessing in the famous ‘Mara Yuddha’ cartoon of 1956. In its updated version, the public perception is of a UNP dominated, driven or disproportionately influenced by non-national, foreign interventionist, LGBTIQ and Evangelical elites or lobbies. President Sirisena’s SLFP is therefore seen as a mere tail of such a UNP (emphasis mine).

[unquote]

This statement carries tremendous significance. The point made here is a fundamental factor that every single human rights advocate, and supporter of the Joint Government (especially those in the LGBTQIA community) ought to come to terms with. This statement is also suggestive of many of the ills, problems and challenges in present-day Sri Lankan politics.

Two opposed sides in collision?

To summarise the basics, Sri Lankan politics today are divided by a clear socio-cultural dividing line. On one side, we have the Justice Minister, the Joint Opposition and its endorsers outside parliament, the Sinhala nationalist lobby (Bodu Bala Sena, Ravana Balaya, Jathika Hela Urumaya – all included), and the Buddhist Sangha establishment – composed, in this case, exclusively of cis-male monks (this is an important factor, as it highlights the tremendous levels of gender bias in the Buddhist establishment).

On the ‘other side’, we have people Dr Jayatilleka describes as ‘rootless cosmopolitan civil society caucuses’.  This lobby is by far the most supportive towards LGBTQIA rights, reproductive justice, and gender justice in general. Name a project meant for the welfare of under-privileged women, Trans and Queer people, domestic violence, the MMDA, a great deal of the activism and engagements come from this lobby. They are indeed funded by Western donors, and the near-totality of individuals and organisations have obligations towards their funders.

Global [neo]Liberal LGBTQIA Activism

In terms of LGBTQIA activism, this type of activism inevitably promotes a liberal perspective on rights related to Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Sex Characteristics (SOGIESC). Very often, we can notice that activism of this nature leads to an NGO-industrial complex, where queer liberalism of the West is understood as the template to emulate. This queer liberalism, while mainstreaming LGBTQIA rights, comes with its share of neoliberal exclusions. The discourse on equal marriage, for example, is one that often encourages LGBTQIA activists to ignore the more pressing day-to-day struggles of Trans women of colour, the continued denial of reproductive rights to Trans and Queer peoples, and the elephant in the room, violence against marginalised segments of the LGBTQIA communities, including Trans and Queer women, people of colour and gender-plural Indigenous peoples.

The limitations and inconsistencies of (neo)liberal LBTQIA politics are clearly evident in what is termed ‘homonationalism’ – especially, evident, for example, in the rampant islamophobia in some LGBTQIA lobbies, and the tendency of government bodies and individual politicians to deploy LGBTQIA rights as a tool in strengthening their Islamophobic and xenophobic policy agendas home and abroad.

A placard displaying an Islamophobic message at London’s Pride parade on 8th July 2017.

It is in challenging trends of this nature that the work of Muslim Queer groups such as Al-Qaws, gains tremendous importance. Political discourses developed by Trans and Queer people of colour – especially in the form of Transfeminist politics –  represent the most poignant critique that constructively complements and challenges the now mainstream Queer liberalism.A Queer-Muslim-affirming placard on display at the 2017 Lucknow Pride, on 9th April 2017 (Source: The Times of India).

Making Sense of LGBTQIA-NGO Work in the Sri Lankan context

Coming back to Dayan Jayatilleka’s view on the ‘rootless cosmopolitan civil society caucuses’, he also mentions LGBTIQ lobbies. It appears that he is referring to LGBTQIA support organisations and their lead activists. Very often, one can observe across the global South that such organisations and their staff have no other option than working with the above-mentioned global neoliberal NGO-industrial complex. At home, (and outside the LGBTQIA communities), they are often despised and looked down upon. In the global LGBTQIA-NGO lobby, they are celebrated. Consider, for example, a recent press report released by the Human Rights Campaign, which quotes Sri Lankan LGBTQIA rights activist Rosanna Flamer-Caldera:

“Pride celebrations are more important than ever to the Sri Lankan LGBTQ community with the recent rise of extremist groups and homophobic government officials threatening the community. While we hope to one day march in the streets to demand our rights, we cannot march peacefully now. Although pride celebrations are generally private events, they are an opportunity to share information about the LGBTQ community with Sri Lankans” (emphasis mine).

Ms Flamer-Caldera’s words marked above in bold sum up a bitter reality. The foremost threats to Sri Lankan citizens’ SOGIESC rights come from our own government and political class. That political class, as this writer has claimed before, includes LGB people who have no qualms about adhering to the overpowering anti-SOGIESC feeling in corridors of power.

In this scenario, two key points require reiteration: a) LGBTQIA community leaders such as Ms Flamer-Caldera and organisations are left with no option, other than working with the NGO-industrial sphere, and b) if an LGBTQIA rights advocate critically engages with the LGBTQIA-NGO lobby, they are frowned upon at both ends Jayatilleka describes – by the LGBTQIA lobby as well as the usually homophobic and transphobic government bodies and socially conservative lobbies.

A government that fails its fellow citizens?

This is where a fundamental problem comes to the fore. The failings of our government and the political class, and the casual homophobia and transphobia among many in the intelligentsia, form a major obstacle to the emergence of a Sri Lankan brand of LGBTQIA leaders who are prepared to uphold Sri Lanka’s interests nationally and internationally. When the democratically elected Head of State, the Justice Minister, and political analysts take pride in homophobia and transphobia, they are throwing a talented, cosmopolitan, multilingual and resourceful segment of their citizenry under the bus.

Consider, for example, the casual homophobia in the Justice Minister’s remarks on the EU’s request to Sri Lanka to respect LGBTQIA rights. To recapitulate briefly, the request involved repealing Articles 365 and 365A of the Penal Code, and adding a SOGIESC equality clause either to the present Constitution, and/or to the proposed new Constitution. This request was translated into Sinhala as සමලිංගික සේවනය නීතිගත කිරීම, which is totally erroneous and meaningless. When the President of Sri Lanka claims in public that he was the one who ditched what he terms the ‘gay proposal’(samalingika yojanava), how can non-hetero-normative Sri Lankan citizens consider him as their head of state?  When local circumstances are this pathetic, we are no longer talking about an issue of external coercion.

Instead, the issue at hand is that of ensuring the fundamental rights of Sri Lankan citizens, that the Sri Lankan state assumes its responsibilities vis-à-vis Sri Lankan citizens. This is the reality that Sri Lanka’s homophobic and transphobic lobby (members of which include the Justice Minister, the President, Dr Dayan Jayatilleka and many other public figures) is yet to understand. The usual [non]claim of homo/transphobes worldwide – ‘that the majority in the country is homo/transphobic and therefore so are we’ – is no longer viable. Not in 2017. 

Challenging neo-colonialism and homo/transphobia simultaneously?

Releasing a message for Pride2017, Prime Minister Theresa May made the following remark:

“Around the world, cruel and discriminatory laws still exist, some of them directly based on the very laws which were repealed in this country 50 years ago. So the UK has a responsibility to stand up for our values and to promote the rights of LGBT+ people internationally. That’s why we will continue to stand up for human rights, directly challenging at the highest political levels governments that criminalise homosexuality or practice violence and discrimination against LGBT+ people.”

Let’s not forget that in Victorian times, highly discriminatory legislation was also introduced in the name of propagating ‘British’ values, of forcing colonized peoples to adhere to British sociocultural codes. The violence of colonisation was such that this ideology of hatred continues to be deeply ingrained into the institutional fabric of many Commonwealth countries. This is especially the case in institutions originally created to serve the colonizers’ vested interests, such as the police, the military as well as the judiciary.

Those who, out of homo/trans-phobia, point the finger at Western-funded LGBTQI organisations, their leaders and other civil society caucuses, never call out police brutality against the most vulnerable in society. This is especially the case towards ethnic minority women, underprivileged [cis and trans] women and members of the LGBTQIA community. Examples abound, and for as long as the state falls short of setting standards of best practice that train law enforcement officials to respect people’s SOGIESC-related fundamental rights, it is inevitable that many in the LGBTQIA community will continue to be estranged from and unsupportive of the institutions in their own country.

Lacunae in global LGBTQIA politics?

Theresa May’s words quoted above point at the problems of Western governments’ policies on LGBTQIA rights worldwide. Not once does she mention the terms ‘colonialism’, ‘empire’ or ‘Victorian’. Not once does she admit that the laws in question were imposed upon colonized peoples by force. Not once does she mention that for many years, decades and centuries, these forcibly imposed laws were fiercely applied as the ‘norm’ upon the lives and bodies of colonized peoples.

A coercive stance on human rights by Western governments, despite its objectives, is thoroughly unadvisable in reaching the objective of supporting LGBTQIA people in the global South. Such policies only result in strengthening the hands of the likes of Dr Dayan Jayatilleka, and the entire homophobic and transphobic lobby.

Standing up for Queer Liberation: The most challenging centre-ground?

Earlier this year, Equal Ground, Sri Lanka’s best known LGBTQIA rights organisation, launched an international petition on the state of LGBTQIA rights in Sri Lanka, which directly pointed the finger at the Sri Lankan government and called upon the European institutions to refrain from granting the GSP+ trade concession to Sri Lanka. Given the threats to LGBTQIA rights coming from the corridors of power and commentators such as Dr Jayatilleka, this action can certainly be justified.

This writer, however, openly opposed this petition, on social media as a private citizen, and in public as a Sri Lankan national, a Trans woman with an international profile, political commentator and a proud member of Sri Lanka’s LGBTQIA community. Writing to The Sunday Times on 26 February 2017, this writer explained her rationale for this opposition:

As the local LGBTQI community launched the collective effort for intersectional and critical engagement, the elite leadership of NGO-industrial LGBTQI activism deployed its international contacts to push the government of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka against the wall. All Out, an international LGBTQI advocacy and campaigning organisation, recently started a campaign – in partnership, as All Out informed this writer on Twitter, with an infamous Sri Lankan organisation – calling upon the European institutions to not to approve a GSP+ trade deal for Sri Lanka until Colombo scraps its ‘anti-gay law’. Most intriguingly the petition carries the by-line ‘no deal for homophobes’. It is the government of Sri Lanka, which voted at the UN in favour of the SOGIE Expert (and the only South Asian government to do so) that this apparently ‘Sri Lankan’ organisation is encouraging the world to view the country as ‘homophobic’.

Conflating LGBTQI rights issues with Colombo’s international trade deals is an ill-conceived and politically myopic step that strengthens the hands of anti-LGBTQI, if not anti-human rights lobbies, giving them added reason to reiterate the often-repeated claim that LGBTQI rights are a Western import of no relevance to Sri Lanka. This petition’s greatest beneficiaries, if any, are those reciting the ‘batahira kumanthrana’ mantra whenever a fundamental rights issue is raised. This petition risks jeopardising local LGBTQI activists who have been working hard to develop an initiative that connects discrimination on the basis of gender identity/expression and/or sexual orientation with the broader spectrum gender-based oppressions, thereby developing a locally conceived and much needed dialogue on Queer Liberation.

A responsible LGBTQI organisation, if it cares for Sri Lanka’s LGBTQI citizens, and focuses on repealing Article 365 of the Penal Code and ensuring constitutional provisions on SOGIE-related equality, has an obligation to distance itself from such ill-advised measures. The path forward for gender and social justice, including the consolidation of citizens’ fundamental rights and equality irrespective of their gender identity/sexual orientation, lies in working with, and being constructively critical of, our government, but not working against it, or discrediting it on the world stage.

Readers are requested to compare these comments with the passage from Dayan Jayatilleka’s defence of the Justice Minister, quoted at the beginning of this article.

The point made here is that there is a need to articulate a local brand of Queer Liberation, in which Sri Lankan citizens’ SOGIESC rights are valorised and respected. It is a movement that imperatively requires sound international links, with the global North as well as with like-minded movements across the global South, but most importantly, Sri Lankan LGBTQIA discourses require articulation in such a way that neither the President of Sri Lanka, nor the Justice Minister, nor the Joint Opposition, nor Dr Dayan Jayatilleka nor any other commentator, can afford to conflate Sri Lankans’ committed struggle for SOGIESC equality and justice (and the inevitable victories of that struggle) with neo-imperialist and coercive agendas coming from corridors of power in the global North [that those treading such corridors require sensitizing on these issues is another matter. This writer, and many other activists who navigate the North with their roots {and their hearts} in the South are at work tirelessly on this front]. 

This writer’s aforementioned stance is one that is simultaneously unpopular with quite a few people in Western-funded LGBTQIA activist circles, as well as with political circles that support an anti-imperialist ethos, national sovereignty and global South partnerships.

The former finds a position of this nature as detrimental to their interests (coming from a Sri Lankan Trans woman, a “someone in our own community criticising our hard work”-type reaction).

The latter, despite its non-negligibly important political positions, is very often all-cis-hetero-normative male (with a small minority of cis-hetero-normative women), and is deeply prejudiced against anyone who is not Sinhala, Buddhist, heterosexual, cisgender and preferably cisgender male. Social conservatisms and internalised prejudices are such that ethnic minority leaders (many of them also cis-het-male) happily side with this latter category, despite the fact that they themselves are at the constant receiving end of majoritarian-nationalist agendas. It also includes a large majority of faith leader-patriarchs. Dr Jayatilleka’s public social media profile provides revealing examples of the views of people in this category. In his responses to comments made by members of the LGBTQIA community on a post that concerns Mangala Samaraweera MP, perhaps the most high-profile openly gay (cis-male) politician in South Asia today, Dr Jayatilleka describes people opposing his homophobia as ‘LGBT trolls’. The following line clearly shows where he (and many others of the same socially conservative category) stands on the fundamental rights of oppressed and marginalised fellow citizens: “…it [the presence of openly LGB people in power] will feed a backlash by the most horrible forces such as the ethno-religious fascists of the BBS”.

It is evident that he has no interest in defending the rights, visibility and upward mobility of marginalised groups, that he chooses to be a silent onlooker predicting an ethno-religious fascist backlash. The statement “if you are neutral in/oblivious to situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor” comes to mind.

#QueerLiberation as the way forward

In sum, a strong drive for Sri Lankan Queer Liberation needs to be one that systematically invalidates Jayatilleka’s remarks on the LGBTQIA community. It is the only strategy robust enough to challenge the patriarchal and [cis-and-trans]misogynist hatred that pervades against the LGBTQIA community [and also within the global LGBTQIA community/ies]. It is also the most insightful path towards ‘un-learning’ biases, prejudices, and challenging cis-hetero-normative inanities. Queer Liberation work involves a form of activism and public engagement that goes beyond constant finger-pointing the Government of Sri Lanka [or any other government in the global South, for that matter] on the international stage.

Instead, it is a form of engagement that takes pride in our Sri Lankan identity, our languages, our national sovereignty, stands for human dignity, equality and justice beyond patriarchal and misogynist oppressions. This involves a trenchant and fierce, yet nuanced critique of our government and our institutions. Most importantly, Queer Liberation ‘must’ boldly and openly claim spaces right across governmental structures, from Parliament downwards. This, needless to say, is the harder path, much harder than NGO-financed neoliberal (and considerably elitist) LGBTQIA activism. Yet, the harder path is also the most promising and necessary path forward, for the betterment of lives of ALL, irrespective of their SOGIESC.

Making way for this new generation of proudly Sri Lankan, cosmopolitan and Queer/Trans citizens who carry the torch of Queer Liberation, who travel the world with Sri Lankan passports and have a vision for a shared future that ensures equality and justice to all Sri Lankans, and standing unconditionally with locally-grounded Queer Liberation, are, at best, the primary responsibilities of Sri Lanka’s intelligentsia today.

The writer (@fremancourt) is a researcher at Queen’s University Belfast, and the LGBTQIA+ Officer of The Labour Party in Northern Ireland. She can be reached at c.weerawardhana@qub.ac.uk.

Print Friendly

Latest comments

  • 12
    6

    Wijedasa Rajapakse is out of his depth, Dayan Jayatilaka mostly out of breath, PM and President out of synch, out of step, out of touch, and out of reach and as a collective result, MaRa and the gang are laughingly out of jail.

    That in a nutshell is what is happening.

    • 3
      1

      Very true!!!

    • 6
      3

      Justice & Fairplay:
      I couldn’t have said it better! What a bunch of non-choices we are faced with: being discriminated and killed now or left to wither and die? Is this what “2500 Years of Sinhala Buddhist Civilization” has given us?

    • 0
      0

      This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn’t abide by our Comment policy.For more detail see our Comment policy https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/comments-policy-2/

  • 3
    6

    The US embassy was busy last year posing for photos with self appointed leaders of Colombo’s lesbian community. They also promoted that stupid bus tour.

    Most do not give a fuck about sexuality. TG is a emotional as well as possible physical issue but it is definitely not genetic given scienctific consensus yet.

    As for your pushing this agenda LIVING IN IRELAND, it is absurd. If you want to make a difference go BACK To SL.

    Do you know what Keshap did not promote it or even host Ifthar at their Embassy this year? New regime in DC. Christian PENCE the VP hates gays. Pence is the epitome of conservative CHRISTIAN evangelical men who want gay conversion therapy. Why the * do you bash Buddhists dude? India is Hindu, and even though they have a HIJRA sub culture they too have not modified.

    I support your moves to repeal the sodomy laws and as far as I can tell unlike Christian USA (specially in Southern states) no one was persecuted for being a homosexual or having anal sex.

    You should focus more on HIV/AIDS still primarily being a gay men’s disease because of promiscuity and because of lack of using protection with multiple partners. Even heterosexual women whose husbands are secretly homosexual or have visited drug using prostitutes infect women because they are careless.

    THERE IS A LOT MORE about sexuality than you wanting to be a woman in SL. I suspect you are a pre-op TG and love anal sex. I love anal sex and anal stimulation from my husband too. but we do not have anal sex without a condom.

    Public display of affection either by gays or heterosexuals is still not the norm.

  • 3
    4

    Why not ask the US Embassy again to sponsor an event? They can get Keshap to dress up in leather, be a temporary queer and parade in a bus. You know why they cannot do what they did last year? The new Conservative Christian government does not care about this. The same reason they cannot host Ifthar in the embassy. I feel sad. I think the sodomy laws need to be repealed but Gay Pride is something HIV prone gay men started in the USA. It is still a WHITE issue for upper class whites. When Philadelphia wanted to change the rainbow flag(people in SL think it is the Cooperative council flag) to include brown the WHITE RACIST GAYS objected. This is still a WHITE problem mostly for westernized people. In villages gays go on being gay without all these in-your-face gayness you want. Most Colombo gays and lesbians are sons and daughters of wealthy people who went to the US where racism is still huge but they came back pretending to be white and westernized and want to do in-your-face gay pride stuff. Be careful when you have anal sex or oral sex. HIV is predominantly passed via anal sex.

  • 3
    5

    What about gay top VVIPs married to top notch Lesbians in SL? you know ones who are “married” nominally but have two foot tongues and love to give pleasure and convert Colombo 7 women to lesbianism because they do a far better job with their tongues than their boorish, crude husbands who only know bam-bam-ooh-ooh I came my cum is in you, I don’t care that you were not satisfied.

    • 4
      0

      Were your three consecutive comments a way of advertising (your own words) “……I love anal sex and anal stimulation from my husband too………?”

  • 3
    5

    Live and let live. USA is increasingly becoming intolerant and anti choice

    More and more restrictions are being placed on a woman’s right to choose.

    You live in Ireland where gay marriage is legal but ABORTION RIGHTS ARE ILLEGAL because of Cathlicism. You need to stop being such a whiny fellow with one dimensional causes that have nothing to do with SriLanka. Christians and Muslims are more hateful towards Gay and TG people than buddhists or Hindus. Stop this sensationalism. I also support a,woman’s right to choose or person to be butch man like lesbian or effeminate female like male TG.live and let live.

    http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_59637d02e4b02e9bdb0e17bb

  • 2
    2

    Chamindra Weerawardhana is well known for taking up the cause of LGBTQIA people. However in this article she brings out her concerns about the political exploitation of Lankans of language/religion divide.
    Watch out Chamindra “the mother-of-all-bigots” HLD Mahindapala has been instructed to write about you by ……….? (the name you did not name)

  • 3
    4

    Wijewardne: Gays and Lesbians and even the western govts think that promoting those movemenrs inside Sri lanka is democracy. Gays and Lesbians are highly discriminated in certan western countries (you know which) and In Sri lanka, they do not need special rigths, Sri lanka do not discrminate, persecute and they don’t have to behave like animals iwithin the society. I mean our buddhist culture teaches them at least to do what ever you do within closed spaces. I heard, they want the Eastern Pasikuda or the eastern region to be a Gay and lesbian paradise. [Edited out]

  • 0
    0

    This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn’t abide by our Comment policy.For more detail see our Comment policy https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/comments-policy-2/

  • 4
    0

    I agree with you that an economic boycott of Sri Lanka in order to force the state to repeal sodomy laws is counter-productive. It only gives more fire power for the homophobes.

    I think in this 21st century, we need to recognize that OUR CULTURE (sangskruthiya in sinhala) is not homogeneous. We have people who have many different perspectives on sex, love, relationships and family. If we are a true democracy, ALL of these people need to be respected and their safety guaranteed by the state.

    So the mechanisms that the pro-western and locally elite organizations like Equal Ground (led by Ms. Flamer-Caldera) need to be changed to fit our local scenario. Going around Colombo in a bus, is good for visibility, but encouraging LGBT people to empower themselves so they are able to come-out to their family, neighbours and friends is much more important. For is is only then that regular non LBGT people will recognize the common humanity and lobby the spine-less politicians to change discriminatory laws.

  • 0
    1

    Do you consider yourself a TG or a TV? A TV is a man who wants to dress like a woman and is effeminate. A TG has chromosic abberations and is biologically not quite a male nor a female. Thai Lady boys and female impersonators with breast implants(meaning artificial). Preferred sex is anal.

    But right now in SL we have Dengue, Garbage crisis, cost of living, Bond issues, utter incompetent government etc to worry about.

    Buddhists and Hindus are far more accepting and tolerant of non-traditional lifestyles. So it is the Christians who brought those sodomy laws that must be repealed. The west is forcing lifestyles on people even when gay rural people in SL do not want to be paraded around in shocking clothing in gay parades. This is where your priority is all wrong. You want thongs and muscular queer men dancing on the streets and parading in shocking outfits and embarrass people; this is no Ireland, NYC or San Francisco with the HIV plague.

  • 0
    1

    White Christians brought in these hypocritical laws. Turing and Oscar Wilde were persecuted for being gay. Not a Single person in predominantly Buddhist and Hindu Ceylon have been persecuted for being gay. IN CHRISTIAN US, some cops tried to do that and jail people and their arrests were declared illegal by the Supreme Court.

    Pence and tens of millions of Evangelicals hate gays. Until you chase out Evangelical fanatics, Islamic fanatics and basically corporate evangelicals from US out of Ceylon you will not have sama-lingika panath.

    Notice this year the US mission sent a chokka pencil pusher low ranked member to the meeting on LGBTQ issues where EU wants to make SL a gay paradise. Last year Atul Keshap posed for photos with Flamer-Caldera and they all backed the rainbow parade. People asked “mokakda mey wikaaraey sammuupara kaara kodiya ekka”,

    Live and let live but not “in your face” gay parade. Will you like heterosexual men and women in lunketts and bras parading “hetero pride”? NO right because our slow cultural norms and values do not encourage “in your face” sexuality. Dengue, BBS, corruption, and garbage are bigger priorities.

    Encourage discussion. Encourage honesty and not rainbow parades like what started in US with mostly white gays. Do you feel discriminated by law? if so then try to get the sodomy laws repealed but if no one is persecuted why bother? Do you want to get transplants and surgery to become women ? pay for it in the West.

  • 1
    1

    A lot of Lankan and Indian men are bi-sexual. They start off at all boys schools in Colombo having sex and oral sex with their roommates in hostels and also in the prefects rooms. Then they rape and molest younger students even at Rowyell kolleyge. Kollo kapanawa as they say it. Then lots of captains of industry, big powerful ministers and other VVIPS are either up front gay and effeminate or secret gays with preferential treatment given to their gay partners in choice positions even inside the cabinet. Facts are facts. Bisexual men in denial of their identity suffer from self loathing. That is why they love to torture and rape political prisoners. They through arranged marriage lots of men are “married” but love men or boys. Honesty has never been a trait amongst Sri Lanka’s upper classes.

  • 8
    2

    LGBT promoted by a sic Hillary and ladies man conman Obama.
    Mindfulness has gone wild and intense sex appeal crawling into our lives.

    The basic wants of man are food, clothing, shelter and satiation of sexual desire. Equality is utopian even for the westerner.

    1968 Beatles, Woodstock and Ansell condom!

    Libturds are in pursuit of pleasure, pleasure-seeking, lotus-eating, caring about bombarding the east with kama surta and ultimately performing Sallekhana.

    The need of the hour is zero unemployment and make in lanka.

    • 0
      1

      Hillary is a lesbian married to a philanderer. Or she is at the least Bi-Sexual. Her partner is believed to be Huma Abedin her long long long time “companion”. There is a VVIP in SL who is married to a lesbian too. But intellectually they are compatible. This agenda was pushed on us by US Embassy and their gay cohorts who put a lot of pressure. Now that pressure has eased because good Christians are in charge in DC. They did not force this agenda this year in Colombo.

      Good Christians can help us save ourselves from abominations. Sri Lanka should accept Jesus and make sure sinners are forgiven while the sin is not. But right now we are struggling with Dengue.

  • 0
    3

    Dear Eelam Tamils . What should be the policy of future Tamil Eelam on homosexuals. Should Eelam Tamil government legalize it, or criminalize it or just ignore or disown all and kick out of Tamil Eelam. I dont have much respect for faggots but i would like to know what fellow Eelam Tamils think. even our thalaivar did not have a clear policy on this . few of you may know Gobi was also a fagot and therefore Thalaivar put him as the incharge of female fighters, during the early days.
    it is easy for us if Thalaivar had set a policy, so that we could have follow. but on this subject, we have to decide . It is important to know what Thalaivar would have done and take our decision on that line.
    Please share your thoughts and I think the manifesto of Tamil eelam should take your ideas into account.
    Tamils quest is for Tamil Eelam

    • 0
      6

      Hindus and Buddhists are backward. All you can hope to do now in your post war nation is to accept Jesus. You also use the wrong abuse to describe a female lesbian. They are not described using the “F” word but the “D” word. But we Christians accept the sinner and hope to pray together to save him or her from their misguided ways while rejecting the sin. You people worship mythical multi limbed gods and waste time. Accept Jesus and you will be saved and not left behind. We know this now because America is soon going to become a good Christian nation. Join us and be saved.

      There is only one Lawgiver and Judge, the one who is able to save and destroy. But you—who are you to judge your neighbor?

      • 0
        0

        @Rachell.Hill. you disgusting bible.thumbing scum. Did i ask your stinky opinion. Who are you ? i.have clearly addressed.my question to Eelam Tamils, which you are not. you are a disgusting creature. get lost.

      • 0
        0

        Eelam Tamils!
        Dont you have an opinion? Do you expect Talaivar to decide that too for us.? you lazy scums, contribute to Eelam at least by word. Do not expect a few brave Eelam Tamil patriots to do all the work and build Eelam so that you can come for vacation.
        Tamils quest is for Tamil Eelam!

  • 4
    1

    Towards Sri Lankan Queer Liberation: A Global-Sri Lankan Reflection For Pride 2017

    Ever since Governor West Ridgeway put the mockers on the Sir Hector Macdonald in 1903 (too late, it was shown to be a bum rap!) Ceylon and Sri Lanka has quietly chosen to let sleeping dogs lie. We in this enchanted island have been happy to tolerate anything as long as it is behind closed doors, and the fauna are not disturbed.

    In this happy hypocrisy we have all got along; cabbages and kings. How strange that some of our own left-handed practitioners (in politics and the clergy) do not have a zip between them. Many play at home and away, going under the radar for the sake of peace. The reality is that our tolerant majority, heirs to a 2500-year culture, will ultimate come around to gracefully accept change. So, to Rosanna F-C and others I say, don’t rush it, and risk a sour resistance, be patient and all will be well in good time. Meanwhile, there a bigger hurdles to clear….

  • 5
    2

    Love anyone you want, be affectionate towards anyone you like, BUT sodomy is disgusting, unscientific, unnatural, spread dangerous disease, and against civilized culture. No one can truly change their gender but you can pretend or fantasies to be another gender but you are live a lie.

  • 4
    2

    Lgbt is a sign of the end of humanity.

  • 4
    2

    Lgbt is a sign of the end of humanity. Instead of accepting abnormal behavior, they should be cured.

  • 4
    1

    There is normal behaviours and there are abnormal behaviours.

    If a person got mental health issues, we sympathies with them for their abnormal behaviours. They should be treated.

    If a person is born deaf, we sympathies with that person because it’s not normal. So, we treat them.

    If a man looks at another man’s genital or bottom as sexual objects, it’s a sickness that’s need to be treated.

    It’s not about human rights, it’s about sickness that needs treatment.

  • 0
    3

    What is the treatment for ill-educated judegments and hate-filled (“and fear-induced) pronouncements?

    EDUCATION. Get one.

    • 2
      0

      When animals have better morals than gays and lesbians, educations hasn’t done much for some people. They need medical attention.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.