18 September, 2018

Blog

Yahapālana Goals Will Be In Jeopardy If SLFP & UNP Contest Separately

By Javid Yusuf

ජාවිඩ් යූසුෆ්

The Yahapalana Government is faced with two immediate challenges. The first is to hold  Local Government elections without any further delay and the second is whether to face the Elections separately as the SLFP and as the UNP or jointly as the Yahapalanaya combine like at the Presidential Elections.

The long delayed Local Government  Elections  has now been confronted by a new  stumbling block in the form of a legal challenge to the Delimitation Gazette issued by the Minister of Local Government Faizer Musthapha. It has also resulted in a political fall out with both the Joint Opposition and the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna presenting two separate no-confidence motions against the Minister in relation to his inability to hold the Elections on time.

It is very clear that the Minister has a great deal to answer for in relation to the long delay in holding the elections. The Chairman of the Delimitation Review Committee Mr. Asoka Pieris himself has gone on record stating that he had been asked by the Minister to delay his report. On another occasion when Mr. Asoka Pieris turned up at the Ministry on a date given  by the Minister to handover the final report, Mr. Pieris found to his dismay that the Minister had gone abroad.

Whenever the Minister was questioned about the delay in holding the Local Government Elections Mr. Musthapha ‘s stock answer was that he would issue the relevant gazette immediately after Mr. Asoka Pieris handed over his report. But once Mr. Pieris did handover his report the Minister took several months to issue the gazette. And after all that the gazette is now being challenged in the Courts on the basis that there was a legal flaw in the gazette which the JVP alleges could not have been an oversight  given the Minister’s credentials as a President’s Counsel and could only have been a deliberate ploy to further delay the Local Government Elections.

The legal challenge itself has aroused suspicion. The independent Election monitoring body PAFFREL has called it a definite political conspiracy. It is rather baffling how six Petitioners from different parts of the country woke up one morning and  decided to challenge the relevant  gazette at the same time. The JVP has alleged  that the Petitioners were linked to SLFP politicians in the Government.

Another factor that has aroused suspicion is the choice of Counsel for the Petitioners. It has been reported in the media that N. M. Shahied who started his career as a junior to the Minister’s  father  Faisz Musthapha and continues to remain his close associate is appearing for all the Petitioners. If this  is correct it is again a rather amazing coincidence that six Petitioners from different parts of the country decided to choose the same Counsel for their legal  challenge. The JVP  Leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake speaking in Parliament has dubbed the case as “Musthapha vs Musthapha“. However for those not familiar with the law it must be stated that the Petitioners were well within their right not only to institute legal proceedings but to choose the same Counsel.

It is only from a political point of view that the question of whether the Petitioners were acting independent of each other or whether they were part of a coordinated operation is a matter of interest. An examination of the six different Petition will shed further light on the matter. If the wording in the six Petitions show a close or striking resemblance to each other it will be easier to come to a conclusion on the matter.

The two no confidence motions also have political implications for the Government. The UNP backbenchers too have expressed their disapproval of Mr. Musthapha’s conduct in handling the issue of Local Government Elections.

In this context if the  Joint Opposition, the JVP and the UNP vote for the no confidence motions the two motions will be easily carried and the Minister will be compelled to resign. If the UNP abstains from voting, it will be touch and go for the Minister because the Joint Opposition votes together with those of the JVP will be more than that of the SLFPers in Government. In such a situation the TNA s votes will become critical.

Given the current context  vis a vis the further postponement of the Local Government Elections  there seem to be only two possible options for the Government. Minister Champika Ranawaka has on a previous occasion stated that the absence of a political leadership at the Local Government level contributed to the failure of the collection of garbage which has in turn contributed to the spread of dengue in the recent past. Although the political leadership of the Local Government comprised a number of bad eggs and criminal elements in the past it is still a necessary layer of Government and an important part of the democratic landscape. Hence the continued postponement of the Elections is not a feasible option for the Government.

The first option for the Government is to ensure that Local Government Elections are immediately held in the local bodies that are not effected by the gazette that is being challenged in the Court of Appeal and the rest after the issues before the Courts are sorted out. The other option would be to hold the Elections under the previous Proportionate Representation system and hold the next round of Local Government Elections. For this Parliamentary intervention  will be necessary.

When the Local Government Elections were being continuously delayed the UNP on different occasions expressed their willingness to have this round of Elections to local bodies on the old PR system in order to avoid further delay and to hold subsequent Local Government Elections on the new system.

In fact there are good reasons for the mixed system of Elections to be used in the next round of  Local Government Elections and not this one. The shoddy process followed to approve the amendments to the Local Government Election Law did not leave much time for the public or Parliament to discuss the legislation. Consequently what has been produced is a shoddy piece of legislation leaving many areas subject to different interpretations and also alack of clarity.

Two instances maybe cited. Firstly there is no provision for a single candidate to contest a ward  in a local body. All candidates have to be part of a list  and an individual cannot contest by himself. This is contrary to the normal cannons of Local Government where individual interventions have been of great value in the past.

Another issue is that of multi member constituencies which are being introduced for the first time. The concept of a multi member constituency has been used in Parliamentary Elections to ensure minority and other interests are represented. While these maybe relevant in Parliamentary and similar elections in view of the National nature of the legislation discussed in those Assemblies it has hardly any relevance to discussions in local bodies. Besides when the country is on Reconciliation mode it is necessary to encourage people at the grass roots not to use ethnicity as a yardstick to elect people to local bodies. In fact elections to Local bodies should be designed to ensure that the process promotes National Unity and Nation Building by making Local bodies building blocks to achieve these larger National Objectives.

In any event it is not clear whether multi member constituencies as envisaged by the new Law will ensure minority representation. The way the legislation is drafted could result  in all the representatives elected in a multimember constituency being from the majority community.

The Second challenge facing the Yahapalanaya Government is how the two main constituent parties are going to face the Local Government Elections. Already the cracks are beginning to show in the Government with Parliamentarians in the UNP and SLFP criticizing  each other on public  platforms. A highly contested election campaign in which the UNP and SLFP are pitted will result in the criticism of each other reaching  higher levels and can render the continued existence of the National Unity Government more difficult after the Elections.

Meanwhile there are also moves to re unite the two factions of the SLFP and contest as one party the sole aim of which is to defeat the UNP. This raises more questions than it answers. If the two factions of the SLFP join together what happens to the pledges made to the people  at the January 8,2015 Elections.

President Maithripala Sirisena together with the UNP and other civil society organizations  promised the people that the Executive Presidency will be abolished, a new Constitution will be enacted, the problems of the minorities will be resolved, those guilty of corruption will be punished, new anti corruption measures will be adopted, strengthening  democracy  among a host of other measures. The Joint Opposition has different views to President  Maithripala Sirisena on many of these matters. For instance the Joint Opposition does not believe a new Constitution is required nor does it acknowledge that there was widespread corruption during the tenure of the previous Government. If the two factions of the SLFP unite will it mean that  these pledges given to the people will be simply forgotten.

Neither President Maithripala Sirisena nor Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe nor their respective parties have the right to change the direction the people of this country chose for themselves  on January 8, 2015. The Yahapalana Government has a great deal of unfinished business to complete.

None of the constituents of the National Unity Government have the moral right to jeopardse the future of this Government by contest ing the local Government Elections separately. The President and Prime Minister need to iron out the current misunderstandings between the parties and move forward.

The National Interest demands that the SLFP faction of the Government  and the UNP contest the Local Government Elections as one Front like the January 8,2015 Elections. They are obliged to fulfil their promises to the people. They do not need to wait until 2020 to fulfill the Yahapalana objectives. If they could complete it by 2019  or even 2018 the people will not mind them going their separate ways after they can truly say to themselves “ mission accomplished”. 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 1
    2

    Only with respect to Muslims and not Tamils who is fighting for there share, Muslims are represented by sects wise. there are so many muslim parliamentarians in order to represent different sects. With respect to Tamils, it is the same. There are somany Tamils to repsent, so many Tamil casts. Sopme Tamil policiticnas can not win on their own (ananda Sangaree), so they are national list MPs. Besides, all LSSP, CP, and even Rajitha Senarathne like LSSP politicians, Avamangala like UNP politicians represent minorities. There are so many christian and Catholic MPs. Even Ranil is attending mosques. MY3 is attending Kovils.
    then there are nine provincial councils which acts ass senates. Because, they wants laws and development only specific to their region.
    Now, why do we need another local govt constitutional assemblies. JRJ had a program of Cultivation officers and some others had a Agricultural Army at the grass root level. Are these constitutional assemblies a reappearance of those ?. Only thing is is has been given a minority face to fool the minorities.
    Why nothing for buddhists. All at the expense of buddhists. If they talk it becomes racism. How come ?

  • 0
    0

    It is going to be “Hobson’s Choice”.
    Chaos as usual.
    The article makes sense though.

  • 2
    1

    Good governance is a fake story ..
    All what Ranil and M&s want is to keep power .
    I would like to see that M&R come back to power and want to see how he and his cohort will take revenge from these people.
    Foxy Ranil is clear that he did not punish any one for corruption.
    Foxy Ranil knows what is he is defeated ..
    Same apply to M&s as well .
    He did not care why ..
    He knows what will his fate.
    He has forgotten his past .
    So wait and see ..
    It is expected that good governance will collapse

  • 2
    0

    SLFP did not make those promises uttered by MY3 platform. That is for MY3+RW+CBK+(a)bala purawesi NGO clique supported by TNA & JVP to full fill. Therefore SLFP is free to make it’s own decisions as to the course of action it should take. The problem of course is that the real SLFP rank and file are with JO (the real opposition), as per the people’s will expressed in 2015 General Election. The regime was able to ignore it as long as there are no elections. It is a crisis destined to blow out even if UNP and official SLFP (the name board party) contest on a common ticket.

  • 0
    0

    Faiz Musthapha P.C., a brilliant Lawyer on his own merits was appointed High Commissioner to the UK in the year 2003 when Ranil.W. was PM.
    Recently, he appeared on behalf of the PM when the latter went before the Bond Commission.
    The son Faizer[ son-in-law of Jehan Cassim, a Premadasa loyalist] is ostensibly in the SLFP. He was made a PC by MaRa. It was ofcourse on political considerations and by no means based on eminence at the Bar.
    So in a sense, this case is not Musthapha VS Musthapha but Musthapha AND Musthapha.
    SLFP by day and reasonable use of UNP at night!

  • 0
    0

    It’s time to take a good look at the First 100 days Programme of the yahapalana rogues. All these nondescript characters incapable of thinking for themselves and intoxicated by foul propaganda and lies from Sobitha,Kuveni.and Batalanda,and Gamarala were jumping up and down and waiting for a reformation that never came. What came was the stench of corruption from day ONE. So keep on waiting you brainless shits like Emil,SHYMAN,and Jehan, but they would already put their hands into ill gotten money.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.