26 October, 2020

Blog

America Cannot Assert Moral Authority While Guantánamo Remains Open

UK The Observer, Editorial

For those not charged with any offence, their long detention is a most serious stain on the human rights record of the US

In 2009, defending the promise he made to close Guantánamo Bay, President Barack Obama insisted: “The existence of Guantánamo likely created more terrorists around the world than it ever detained.”

This weekend, the case for the closure of Guantánamo Bay, promised by Obama on his second day in office, has never been more compelling. A hunger strike by the camp’s inmates, half of whom had been cleared for release, has underlined the growing desperation of those 166 still detained. Of that number, some 86 had been approved for transfer (while the rest had been earmarked for trial) but have become stuck in a political and legal limbo that has seen such transfers almost completely halted in the last two-and-a-half years. A recent report by a bipartisan panel of experts has condemned both the conditions there and the use of abusive interrogation techniques.

One of those trapped in this Kafkaesque nightmare is Briton Shaker Aamer. As the Observer reports today, despite a skeleton deal that could pave the way for his release to Saudi Arabia, Aamer rightly insists he should be allowed to return to the UK to rejoin his family.

After 11 years, it is hard to see the rationale for keeping Guantánamo open. It is a fundamental principle of open and democratic societies that those accused or suspected of serious crimes should be submitted to due legal process within a reasonable time period. Indefinite detention of those cleared of any crime, or if those authorities have insufficient evidence to prosecute, is a gross violation of human rights.

The US government’s decision last month that Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, Osama bin Laden’s son-in-law and an al-Qaida spokesman, should be tried in a federal court rather than before a military commission at Guantánamo has underlined the principle that domestic courts are the best place to try terrorism suspects. Indeed, as Human Rights Watch has pointed out, military commissions in Guantánamo have been proved unreliable, unable to deliver real justice and subject to changes in rules and bogged down in procedure.

For those who have not been charged with any offence, their long detention has come to be one of the most serious stains on the human rights record of the US, amounting to open-ended and indefinite incarceration without charge or due process. As David Ignatius argued compellingly in the Washington Post yesterday, there are strong arguments, too, for releasing and transferring Taliban detainees back to Afghanistan. The CIA’s assessment is that even if those individuals returned to the battlefield, it would have no net impact on the military situation, while it might provide impetus in talks with the Taliban.

The reason that Guantánamo remains operational, and with so many stuck within it, has nothing to do with practical issues concerning release or transfer or how some should be tried. Instead, those trapped in Guantánamo are the victims of a political conflict, specifically between Congress and the White House over plans to house and try alleged terrorists in the US. Congress cut off funds to move accused men to the US for detention and insisted on onerous conditions for the transfer of those remaining out of the US, including elaborate arrangements for monitoring.

Obama too must be held responsible for this continuing disgrace. It was the president, after all, who signed into law the National Defence Authorisation Act, jeopardising his ability to close Guantánamo after threatening to veto it.

As Amnesty International and others have pointed out, despite the ban on US funds for transfers contained in the NDAA, another clause, Section 1028, does give Obama the broad right to resolve some cases – such as Shaker Aamer’s – whose return has been requested by the UK government. The resolution of the Shaker Aamer case, as Amnesty argued earlier this year, would be a symbolic step that would demonstrate that Obama has not abandoned his commitment to close Guantánamo.

The well-documented deployment of sustained and abusive interrogation techniques, sexual humiliation and extreme violence in Guantánamo is something that demeans America. That an American president has allowed these depraved practices to continue on his watch is more shocking still. Until America closes Guantánamo Bay, it cannot, as it likes to, assert its moral authority over the rest of the world.

*The Observer, Editorial – 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    0

    Sri Lanka has secret Guantanamos – detention centres where LTTEers are held incommunicado for months and years without trial.
    How about setting an example to the US – indict them or release them.

    • 0
      0

      Fake justice gone kukoo……:)

  • 0
    0

    The inhuman Guantánamo incarceration facility is just one feature of the West’s response to suspected terrorists. These inmates have been locked up and subjected to humiliating conditions and treatment for several years without being brought to trial.

    Obama once promised to close down Guantánamo but Zionist Puppeteer forces bigger than him have prevailed to prevent the puppet Obama from delivering on his promise.

    Look at Palestine, where Israel not only flagrantly violates UN resolutions, but continues with it’s expansion of occupied territories. Where are the champions of human rights?

    As long as the Zionists run the world, no one has a say, including the President of the so-called greatest nation on earth.

  • 0
    0

    West has lost all pretence of morality after the ongoing offensives in Iraq and Afghanistan. Tens of thousands Iraqi, Afghan and Pakistani civilians killed, wounded, maimed in collateral damage and drone strikes.

    Blood and lives of these people is cheap compared to those in the west where there is a great uproar when even a single soul is killed. The western intervention in Iraq based on lies and deception by Bush, Blair and Rumstead should come under crimes against humanity and tried in the hague.

  • 0
    0

    Remember LTTE Guantanamos/ terrible places. Even Mahattaya was finally tortured there before he was killed. They were the real torture chambers in the world,worse than Avichi, Yama’s torture chamber.Aren’t there a few who escaped? Why not release some information about them. How about a Channel 4?

  • 0
    0

    Just because history has it this way, do we expect Rajapakse & Co
    perpetuate crimes of all nature under the guise of democratic action?

    That is the local issue in question that has to be resolved for its
    own citizens. What Bush-Blair did or did not is no cover-up for
    the wanton destruction of humanity that takes place in an oligarchy.

  • 0
    0

    Guantanamo Bay is Cuban territory. The US uses it as an offshore launching point for messages to all freedom fighters of an Islamic persuasion of the dangers of incarceration without any semblance of the White Man’s justice.

    The US props up pro-US dictators world-wide, and causes regime change in the oil rich regions to install puppets subservient to their geo-political needs.

    The US abhors democracy and is paranoid about it taking hold in the resource rich regions of the world, lest it adversely affects their exploitation strategies.

    The vastly fictitious “War on Terror” was perpetrated on innocent countries with millions of innocent lives taken in the name of spurious rubric of justice and human rights, liberation and fair play.

    The ethnic cleansing of Palestinians and daily crimes against humanity perpetrated by Zionist Israelis go unpunished, except when on an infinitely smaller scale someone symbolically explodes a bomb in the West.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.