24 September, 2020

Blog

China Reaches Out

By Charitha Ratwatte –

Charitha Ratwatte

Charitha Ratwatte

President Xi of China is scheduled to visit India and Sri Lanka. The Middle Kingdom of ancient times is asserting itself on the world stage. The current leaders of China are driven by a ‘manifest destiny’, a strategic view that China is destined to play a dominant role in their region and the world.

Historically, from the time of the Emperors, China has considered the rest of the world, including its neighbours, especially those untouched by Chinese culture, as inferiors. For over 2,000 years, what is now called the South China Sea has been a meeting point for diverse cultures and for global trade.

A more historically accurate name for that expanse of ocean would be ‘Malay Sea,’ since it was the Malays of Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines who traversed this stretch of ocean on a regular basis. The Portuguese were the first Europeans to reach this expanse of ocean, and they knew it as the Cham Sea, so called after the Hindu, Malay-speaking mercantile state which was located in a part of today’s Vietnam.

The South China Sea is known to the Chinese as the South Sea, to Vietnam as the East Sea, to the Philippines as the West Philippine Sea – it lacks a neutral name! China today is establishing footholds far from its own shores, in this part of the ocean, to allegedly try to turn it into a Chinese lake!

China’s claims, which extend to rocks and shoals located within a few miles from the coast of the Philippines, Malaysia and Indonesia, are asserted by a history of alleged visits by Chinese fleets, which ignores the non-Chinese people who for millennia have been the region’s principle inhabitants.

It is indeed remarkable in historical fact, how little direct impact China made in this region. The visitors from the Indian sub continent brought the first extraneous cultural wave into this part of the world. They made Buddhism, Hinduism and Indian scripts pre-eminent. Traders from the Arab and Persian markets chasing the spice trade were next, bringing Islam.

Hot on their heels, aggressively trying to dominate the spice trade, came the Europeans.

The Chinese did not play a big role, other than during the early Ming Emperor’s period, when Admiral Zheng He took his massive armada fleets around the world, arriving at Galle in southern Sri Lanka and taking captive the local satrap and leaving behind a plaque in Arabic, Persian, Tamil and Chinese, to be found in the Galle Maritime Museum to this day.

China’s centralised power

China’s centralised power goes back a long time. In 221 BC, when China was first unified, in Europe, Rome was still fighting Carthage over the western Mediterranean. Later Rome collapsed, China too collapsed many times, but by the end of the Han dynasty in 220 AD, the Emperors had institutionalised the teachings of Confucius, which emphasised the value of social hierarchy and personal morality, as the basis of government.

By the Tang dynasty in the 7th century, China was one of the most illustrious and wealthiest nations. However, China did not industrialise in the way Western nations did. Although Europe learnt of gun powder from China in the Middle Ages, by the 19th century Europeans were far more skilled in using gun powder for military conquests than China.

Britain used force upon China in the 1830s, forcing China to open its doors to trade and addictive opium from India. In 1842, Britain grabbed Hong Kong. In the 1890s Japan humiliatingly defeated China in battle. The victory of Maoism in 1949 can be connected to this humiliation, among other factors.

As a further reaction to this alleged international humiliation, China seems to be emulating the policy laid out by American President James Monroe, the ‘Monroe Doctrine’. Monroe prescribed a policy of refusal to countenance any interference in the Western hemisphere, America’s backwater, by any European nation; all such inclusions would be treated as acts of aggression.

Conceptually there are similarities between China’s policy in East Asia and the Monroe doctrine. When President Xi, at his 2013 California summit with President Obama, said that ‘the vast Pacific has enough space for two large countries like the United States and China’, some analysts say it was not only holding out the possibility of peaceful coexistence, but also an assertion of China’s legitimate interests in the region; interests which it has always had, but not aggressively promoted, until recently.

There is an asymmetry; the USA has four of its 10 air craft carrier groups stationed in the Pacific, while China is still building its first one. But the direction in which China is heading is clearly indicated.

There are linkages between President Xi’s controversial attempts at home to clamp down on corruption and ram through tough economic and financial reforms. A foreign distraction is often useful to distract critics of domestic policy. There are always linkages in consolidating power at home and throwing a nation’s weight around abroad. An international equivalent of ‘bread and circuses’!

China spreading its influence

China is spreading its influence in a planned and structured manner to all parts of the globe. It is using its fast-developing economic power to expand its influence in both economic and political terms far beyond the Asian region.

Analysts claim that in 2011 China was the world’s sixth largest international investor. Sri Lankans are well aware of the strong influence China has over Sri Lanka’s economic development. Through a mixture of grants, soft and commercial loans, China is involved in a large number of infrastructure development projects in all parts of Sri Lanka.

Politically, too China is asserting itself. Recently the Chinese Ambassador in Sri Lanka met with the leaders of the Tamil National Alliance shortly after the TNA team had returned from India after a series of meetings with political leaders and officials. The TNA team has told the newspapers that the meeting was at the express request of the Chinese Ambassador. The TNA stated that they had covered a lot of ground in discussions with the Ambassador, including the visit of the TNA delegation to India.

China is expanding its sphere of influence in all parts of Asia. There is an ongoing dispute over some rocky outcrops in the South China Sea, the Scarborough Shoals, around the Philippines, Vietnam, Japan and Taiwan. The row between Japan and China over five islets that lie between them resurfaced again recently, when the Japanese Government decided to buy the three islands it does not already own from their private owner.

China reacted with outrage and sent two naval patrol boats to waters near to the islets, which the Japanese call Senkaku and the Chinese call Diaoyu. A Chinese newspaper, the Global Times, recently went as far as to question Japanese sovereignty over the prefecture of Okinawa! The dispute borders around both countries’ Exclusive Economic Zones, in terms of the Law of the Sea Convention, ratified in 1982.

On the Asian mainland, China is extremely conscious of the potential effect the democratisation of Myanmar, promoted by the ASEAN nations and the Western liberal democratic nations, may have on the region. Internal unrest in Tibet, fuelled by a spate of recent self-immolations, and an ongoing dispute with India over the Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh are also live international political issues.

The Indian Army is raising a number of new mountain divisions to station on the border with China and in Ladakh. 2012 being the 50th anniversary of the 1962 invasion of India by the People’s Liberation Army of China, there is a resurgence in India, among the media especially, on the 1962 episode, where the PLA advanced into India, gave the Indian Army a bloody nose and pulled back into China.

It is reported that Deng Hsiao Ping, visiting the United States, had mentioned to President Jimmy Carter that China, which was having a border dispute with Vietnam at that time, would teach Vietnam also a lesson in the manner China taught India a lesson in 1962. True to form, the PLA advanced across the China-Vietnam border shortly thereafter. The battled-hardened Vietnamese veterans of the Vietnam war against the US put up a spirited defence, unlike the ill-prepared, ill-equipped and badly-led India forces in 1962.

To the north, while relations with Russia seem stable, there is a history of border disputes, while with Mongolia, China has ongoing issues over access to Mongolia’s humongous mineral wealth, which Chinese-owned, both State and corporate entities, are eyeing.

The freedom of the seas also has become an issue to China, with over 70% of its raw materials and oil and gas coming through the southern seas and the Straits of Malacca. One Chinese leader referred to this as ‘China’s Malacca Dilemma’. The Chinese also have deployed naval assets to assist the international policing operation against Somali pirates off the coast of East Africa, mainly in self-interest, to protect its shipping routes. The first Chinese aircraft carrier is undergoing sea trials.

The Chinese interest in the political unrest in the Maldives Islamic Republic is also said to be based on the fear of the possibility of Islamic fundamentalist pirates locating themselves on an uninhabited Maldivian atoll and preying on ships carrying raw material to China across the southern seas.

China’s demographic shift

In China, today, non-State owned businesses are prospering, while State-owned enterprises are in retreat. Over the next few years China will undergo a huge demographic shift. The proportion of people over 60 in the total population will increase from 12.5% in 2010 to 20% in 2020. A Report by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences says that China’s ‘demographic dividend’ – the availability of lots of young workers which helped fuel economic growth – will soon disappear.

Many Chinese are now familiar with the concept of the ‘Lewis turning point,’ named after an economist from St. Lucia, in the Caribbean, Arthur Lewis, who said that industrial wages will start to rise quickly when a country’s rural labour surplus dries up. Already this has been seen in China; manufacturing industries are moving away from the coastal areas, where they were first promoted, as rural migrants no longer leave their villages and migrate to work in the sweat shops on the coast. Factories are being moved inland, where labour is more plentiful.

However, the new system, by which farmers are allowed to market their surplus produce on their own, has seem a rise in rural small farm incomes, and such agriculturalists are reluctant to work long hours in factories. The one child policy implemented for many years has resulted in a fast-rising population of retired people, whose pensions will have to be paid for by taxes raised from a shrinking pool of current workers. This policy has now been relaxed.

A big increase in the age of retirement in China is long overdue. The official retirement age of 60 for men and 50 for women was fixed in 1951, when the average life expectancy in China was 46, compared to today’s 73. These are the pressing economic and social issues facing China.

Battle lines are clearly drawn

Zhu Feng, an international affairs expert at Beijing University has said: ‘We are the 800 pound gorilla in the room. China is learning to be a great power.’

Teufel Dreyer, a Professor at the University of Miami, says, of China: ‘There is a debate at the top. Some leaders assert that China must assert its interests in a more straightforward way, to get its hands on resources it needs to power its economy. Others say the country must continue to give priority to domestic development and solving internal social challenges.’

Recently Red Princeling and former Chairman of a State-owned company, Qin Xiao, now heading an independent think tank – the Boyuan Foundation – made a speech at one of China’s most prestigious universities, Tsinghua, accusing the party hierarchy of substituting the enlightened values of democracy, freedom and individual rights, with ‘Chinese’ ones such as stability of the status quo and the interests of the State being paramount.

Qin founded the Boyuan Foundation in 2007, together with investment banker and Red Princeling He Di, saying that ‘China needs someone to stand up and speak’. Quin in an interview with a newspaper published in Guangdong Province, the Southern People’s Weekly, said: ‘The Arab Spring showed that no matter how well a country’s economy performed, people will not accept dictatorial, corrupt government.’ Also Wang Changjian, a scholar at Communist Party’s training academy for cadres, has pointed out that there seems to be a phobia against political reform.

In China the battle lines are clearly drawn between the Universalists, who believe China must eventually converge on democratic norms, and the Exceptionalists, who believe that China must preserve and perfect its authoritarianism. While Qin and the Boyuan Foundation represent the Universalists, Zhang Weiwei represents the Exceptionalists.

Zhang recently wrote China’s evolution should be ‘as if the Roman Empire had never collapsed and had survived to this day, turning itself into a modern state with a central government and modern economy, combining all sorts of traditional cultures into one body with everyone speaking Latin.’

This Exceptionalist point of view, which is a confluence of nationalism, rapidly-growing military capability and deeply-held feelings of victimhood are worrying. However, Chinese officials keep articulating the need for a ‘harmonious world’ and decry the use of military force to resolve disputes.

Where will China be in 20 years?

It is interesting to see where China will be in two decades’ time. Will the Exceptionalists carry the day and will China end up being a seething pot of nationalist hate, bent on taking revenge from the world, for the past injustices imposed on China by the imperialist powers? Or will the Universalists win through and, will China end up a rich and affluent, extra large size ‘XL’ Singapore Inc., with warlike intentions only being manifested in corporate board rooms?

Non-Chinese planners project that China in 20 years will be a near peer power, bumping up against the United States of America in terms of economic and military capability, having aggressive intentions with its neighbours and nation states which do not do China’s bidding, perceived to be within its legitimate sphere of influence, like Sri Lanka.

But change can be difficult. Consider the events in Hong Kong, where the Occupy Central Movement is pushing for China to honour its treaty commitments to Britain, on Deng Hsiao Ping’s ‘one country , two systems’ and ensure the survival of the democratic attributes of Hong Kong, voting through universal franchise for leaders, an independent public service and judiciary, a free press, etc.

Ratcheting up the profile of China in the international sphere will prove equally difficult. For example, China has vetoed interventions Western powers sought in Syria and Darfur, but has not taken a position of Putin’s antics in the Ukraine, although China takes a dim view of such centifrugalism within China!

Steering China through this maze of contradictions will not be easy. President Xi has a challenging agenda before him. Challenging neighbours and building alliances with friends further away may turn out to be a useful distraction for the Communist Party cadres.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 2
    1

    The fact is the Chinese took a foothold in Sri Lanka with its military support during the last LTTE war. It was a self serving exercise and has paid very high dividends to China. The present day travails of the Sri Lankan people, being governed by a Mafia like family who take everything and give next to nothing but corruption and poverty can be partly blamed on the Chinese. It is Chinese money that is funding all the useless projects in Sri Lanka with the Rajapakshas channelling most of it via its Seychelles laundry. The dreadfulness of this situation is that the people of Sri Lanka have been lugged with a massive payback to the Chinese exchequer for the foreseeable future for white elephant projects such as the Mattala airport. In time the MaRa brothers will retire in style in the Seychelles while we break our backs to pay back the loans for the useless projects.

  • 2
    1

    Chinese never took over the lands along the former silk route. It is highly unlikely that they will be different in the new sea silk route. Chinese have always lived in their cocoon and build the great wall. Hong Kong etc. was and is a part of China. China is lucky British-Indian imperialists took opium to the Chinese and Chinese managed to keep China free from Indian colonists. Sri Lanka and other British dominions were colonized by Indians and drugged by the Indians.

  • 3
    1

    I detect a whiff of Sinophobia. The author is looking at China from a rather common Western perspective. In this view China is expansionist and belligerent. The “Free Tibet campaign” and the fear of the “Domino Effect” after the loss of the Vietnam War by the West, have assumed expansionist tendencies from the Communist Chinese.

    The Domino Effect never happened, because the Chinese were not interested in invading and conquering South East Asia. They were more interested trade, but they were especially interested in feeding and housing their own people. Communism was the enemy of the Capitalist West during the Cold War, during which China was a victim of American aggression, mainly in terms of propaganda and economic warfare. So was Sri Lanka, when the Americans refused to sell sulphur ro Sri Lanka in retaliation for Sri Lanka signing the Rubber-Rice deal with China.

    Chairman Mao’s aim, in the 1960s, was for China’s steel production to equal that of Britain by the year 2000. In terms of industrialization China achieved this, though it was not without cost. Millions died of starvation during the early efforts of China to industrialize and produce more steel. Nowadays Chinese iron imports are sustaining the Australian economy, and the long-held racism towards Chinese is decreasing in Australia. The fear of the “Yellow Peril” remains common among older Australians. In recent times, however, some State-run schools are offering Chinese as a foreign language, even in primary school.

    The fact that there was a greater influence from India that China on the nations surrounding the South China Sea is an indication of how non-expansionist the Chinese have been through history. They do, however, have a long tradition of navigation, and invented the magnetic compass for navigation in the open ocean. Zheng He in the 1400s, with his treasure fleet, was following routes to Africa and the Middle East that had been known since Han Dynasty times, centuries earlier. The Chinese court also had ambassadors from more that 10 nations, who were taken to China by Zheng He. They have been successful diplomats for a long time.

    The voyages of Zheng He were an exception in Chinese history and he was an exceptional man. He was a court eunuch from a Moslem background who had been captured and castrated when he was 10, but grew up to become a favourite of the Yongle emperor. At this time there was a power balance between the more internationalist eunuchs and the more conservative Confucian scholars, who thought the diplomatic/treasure fleets were a waste of money and men. Therefore, when Zheng He died in 1433 there were no more treasure voyages and the Confucian scholars had their way. China became more inward-looking, with the Chinese emperors saying that there was nothing that they needed from the outside (non-Chinese) world. There continued to be limited trade, however; Chinese ships sailed throughout the South China sea, trading via Chinese communities in Indonesia, Philippines and Malaysia. When the Dutch first explored northern Australia they found Indonesian (Makassan) traders engaging in the trapang trade with Australian Aborigines. This trepang (sea-cucumber) is a delicacy in China, where it was destined.

    Communism as espoused by Marx is an international objective, and that’s how Marxism started – as an international agenda to free the workers from oppression around the world, but Chinese Communism has never had this character. It is unique as a system of governance and is much better than during the rule of the emperors. A one-party state need not be oppressive. It can be very effective. In contrast, two and multi-party democracies can be plagued by dissent and division. It is up to the Chinese to choose their method of governance.

    The naming of the South China Sea is a historical result of European explorations. The also called the ocean stretching from east Africa to Australia the “Indian Ocean”.

    • 1
      0

      All Sinophiles wish to claim that China is non-expansionist. But how does China claim not only Tibet but even Arunachal Pradesh as part of China? It may be that China at times ruled over Tibet just as how India or parts of India ruled over Ceylon. India doesn’t claim Sri Lanka as part of that country. How can China justify its claim of Tibet as a part of China?

      Sengodan. M

    • 0
      1

      Why don’t you write an article yourself without either meaningless drivel in short phrases or unreadable long winded claptrap like this ?!!

      I have been watching your appearances on this forum and let me tell you “smart asses” don’t last long !

  • 2
    0

    One sided article by an apologist who deemed to believe every thing coming from the west and everything west did is the best. Fortunately for Sri Lanka, guys with this type of mindsets were defeated in 2004 GE and 2005 PE and continued to be defeated to date. And many followers realized the sham and has abandoned the ship since. Had this clique continue their rule by chance, the North will be under the jackboot of terrorist Velu and the South under arse lickers of neocolonialist. We would never have the peace and development that we enjoy today.

  • 1
    2

    Indians know the West in detail. Because Indian Subcontinent was ruled and ripped off by the West for almost five hundred years. The Japanese know the West in depth through their sufferings and agony due to the atomic bombs. The Chinese communist party does not know the West; if it does, it would not go against other Asian countries. Eventually, the Chinese communist party will get to know the West through its actions, but it will devastate the people of China, and other Asians in the region of Asia. Even if Chinese, Indians and Japanese joint together still they can’t defeat the West, because the West is so powerful. How the Chinese communist party is going to fight against the West, India, Japan and other Asian countries? The Chinese communist party is the same as the Japanese emperor who decided to attack the pearl harbour without knowing the implications of his action. Eventually, the United States dropped two atomic bombs and made the Japanese to suffer and surrender unconditionally. The Japanese emperor made his people, Chinese, Koreans and other Asians to suffer. Likewise, the Chinese communist party will make its people and others to suffer. The Chinese people who have been working hard to make the Chinese communist party rich will pay huge, because of the Chinese communist party’s actions. The Chinese communist party and the Sri Lankan leaders are playing a dangerous game in the Indian Ocean. I am extremely concern about the future of the Indian Ocean. Remember, the West has been ruling the world for the last 700 years; its knowledge and power are beyond comprehension of the Asian leaders. The West had defeated Germany,
    Japan, and (almost) Russia as well. Therefore, we really can’t predict all of the West’s tricks in the future. If things get ugly in the Indian Ocean in the future; the Rajapaksa regime and the Chinese communist party must take responsibility. You all are well aware who pushed the LTTE to fight against the Indian Peace Keeping Forces, and financed the war to last for thirty years. The Rajapaksa regime and the Chinese communist party don’t even bother to consider the worst scenario in the Indian Ocean; but they are happy to gamble with Asia’s future. China backs the Sri Lankan government in safeguarding national independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity. “We believe in the Sri Lankan people’s wisdom and capacity to handle their own affairs.” – Foreign Minister Wang Yi. China does not value India’s, Japan’s, and other South East Asian countries’ sovereignty and territorial integrity, but safeguarding national independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Sri Lanka. This is nothing but duplicity of the Chinese communist party.

  • 1
    1

    The best cooperation with China is to keep the Chinese at the bay and imports only the ”children’s toys” that can be thrown in couple of days. Granting all the mega projects to Chinese are very risky business. Honestly, they are not capable of undertaking any of such projects anywhere in the world. Not only in Hambantota but also in Vietnam, Cambodia and Togo they ventured to build Harbours, Airports, Dockyards, Motorways, Power plants, Mining facilities and Chemical plants are mega failure of Chinese heavy industry which of course, for the sake more stake hold in internal affairs of a respective country. Chinese were kicked out from Vietnam, Philippines, Cambodia and many parts of Africa knowing the danger the Chinese and the Chinese companies pose the threat to the stability, economy and sovereignty to a country and in the region where they footholds. South China Sea Regional conflict and the Chinese threat are very good examples and an eye opener for Sri Lanka. There is no ethical or fair trade deals you can expect with Chinese and never hesitate to bribe the Nation’s leaders to win major projects. Sri Lanka is no exception and even given contracts (Mattala Airport) to World Bank black listed companies (see World Bank Report 2013) and purchased under grade Locomotives for lump sums of Commissions. Those locomotives are at the verge of collapse in our Highlands. If, we, Sri Lankans, still sleep and well come to your future colony Xi!!!!

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.