19 April, 2025

Blog

India First With Friendship To All 

By Jehan Perera

Jehan Perera

The government did everything in its power to welcome Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the three days in April 4-6 he was in Sri Lanka. The country is known for its hospitality and the government exceeded expectations in its hospitality. There were children to greet the prime minister at the airport along with six cabinet ministers. There was a large banner that described the prime minister in glowing terms. President Anura Kumara Dissanayake also conferred the Sri Lanka Mitra Vibhushana Award, the country’s highest award, to Prime Minister Modi in appreciation of friendship and cooperation. The role that the Indian government under him played in saving Sri Lanka from economic disaster three years ago would merit him nothing less. The gesture was not merely humanitarian; it was also an astute expression of regional leadership rooted in a philosophy of “neighbourhood first,” a cornerstone of Prime Minister Modi’s foreign policy.

India has a key role to play as a stabilising actor in South Asia, especially when regional neighbours falter under economic or political pressure. It has yet to reach its full potential in this regard as seen in its relations with Pakistan and Bangladesh. But with regard to Sri Lanka, India has truly excelled. Prime Minister Modi’s visit to Sri Lanka at this time carried symbolic weight beyond the economic and political. President Dissanayake, in his welcome speech, noted that Prime Minister Modi was the first foreign leader to visit after the new government came to power. By being the first to visit he conferred international importance to the newly elected Sri Lankan leaders. This early gesture conveyed India’s tacit endorsement of President Dissanayake’s government, an endorsement that can be especially valuable for a leader without a traditional elite background. The president also remarked on their shared political origins as both originally came into politics as outsiders to the traditional ruling establishments, creating a bridge between them that hinted at a broader ideological compatibility.

President Dissanayake showed his human touch when he first showed the Mitra Vibushana medal to Prime Minister Modi in its box, then took it out and placed it around the neck of the Indian leader. When the two leaders clasped their hands together and raised them, they sent a message of camaraderie and solidarity, an elder statesman with a long track record with a younger one who has just started on his journey of national leadership. Interestingly, April 5 the date on which the award was conferred was also the 54th anniversary of the commencement of the JVP Insurrection of 1971 (and again in 1987), in which anti-India ideology was a main feature. In making this award, President Dissanayake made the point that he was a truly Sri Lankan leader who had transcended his political roots and going beyond the national to the international.

Finding Trust 

Six of the seven agreements signed during the visit focused on economic cooperation. These ranged from renewable energy initiatives and digital governance platforms to infrastructure investments in the plantation sector. Particularly noteworthy were agreements on the construction of homes for the descendants of Indian-origin Tamils and the installation of solar units at 5000 religious sites. Both these projects blend development assistance with a careful sensitivity to identity politics. These initiatives align with India’s strategic use of development diplomacy. Unlike China’s approach to aid and infrastructure which has been frequently critiqued for creating debt dependencies India’s model emphasises partnership, cultural affinity, and long-term capacity building.

The seventh agreement has to do with defence and national security issues which has been a longstanding area of concern for both countries. None of the agreements, including the seventh, have been discussed outside of the government-to-government level, though texts of the other six agreements were released during Prime Minister Modi’s visit. Several of the issues concerning economic agreements have been in the public domain eliciting concerns such as the possibility of personal information on Sri Lankan citizens being accessible to India through the digitization project. However, little is known of the defense agreement. To the extent it meets the needs of the two countries it will serve to build trust between them which is the foundation on which dialogue for mutually beneficial change can take place.

In the past there has been a trust deficit between the two countries. Sri Lankans would be mindful of the perilous security situation the country faced during the time of the war with the LTTE and other Tamil militant organisations, when parts of the country were taken over and governed by the LTTE and the country’s territorial integrity was at stake. This was also a time when Indian military aircraft were deployed in Sri Lankan airspace without the Sri Lankan government’s consent in June 1987, which the Indian government justified as a humanitarian measure, and there were concerns about possible Indian military intervention on a larger scale. This was followed by the signing of the Indo-Lanka Peace Accord the next month in July 1987 which led to the induction of the Indian army as a peacekeeping force into Sri Lanka with government consent.

Unrestricted Friends 

The history of Indian intervention in Sri Lanka’s ethnic conflict has given an impetus to Sri Lanka to look to other big powers to act as a counterbalance to India. In more recent years India has expressed its concern at naval vessels from China coming into Sri Lankan waters on the grounds of doing research which could be used against India. Sri Lanka’s engagement with China has strained ties with India, particularly when Chinese infrastructure investments, such as the Hambantota Port, appears to have the potential to serve dual civilian-military purposes. Given China’s growing global reach and its ambition to project influence through the Belt and Road Initiative, Sri Lanka’s geography makes it a critical hub in the Indian Ocean. Hopefully, with the signing of the defence agreement between India and Sri Lanka, these fears and suspicions of the past will be alleviated and soon come to an end.

The position that the government headed by President Dissanayake has taken is to be friends with all. The principle of “friendship with all, enmity with none” is not new, but the stakes are higher today, as global competition between major powers intensifies. India, by virtue of geography and history, will always be Sri Lanka’s first and most important partner. It was India, and not China, not the West, that provided an emergency economic lifeline when Sri Lanka’s foreign reserves evaporated in 2022. That support, amounting to over $4 billion in credit lines and direct aid, was delivered quickly and with minimal conditionality. It also demonstrated how regional proximity can enable faster, more context-aware responses than those offered by multilateral institutions and more distant big powers.

The world has become a harsher and more openly self-interested one for countries, even ones that were thought to have indissoluble bonds. Sri Lanka’s biggest export markets are in the United States and European Union and it has received large amounts of economic assistance from Japan and China, though unfortunately some of the loans from China were used inappropriately by former Sri Lankan governments to create white elephant infrastructure projects. Burdened now with enormous debt repayments that bankrupted it in 2022, Sri Lanka continues to need economic resources and markets from around the world. President Dissanayake’s government will understand that closeness to India need not mean an exclusive relationship with it alone. In a multipolar world, friendship (and doing business) with all is both a virtue and a necessity. But among friends, there must always be a first —and for reasons of history, culture, religion, geography and strategic logic, that will be India.

Latest comments

  • 5
    0

    “But among friends, there must always be a first —and for reasons of history, culture, religion, geography and strategic logic, that will be India.”

    Is it a tactics or Is it a real friendship?

    • 4
      0

      Ajith,
      “reasons of history, culture, religion, geography and strategic logic, “
      You have left out the most important reason. Economics.

      • 1
        0

        “You have left out the most important reason. Economics.”
        That is not my reasons, it is by the author.

  • 2
    5

    “Friendship To All”
    Interesting thought!

    • 11
      0

      S.J,
      “India First With Friendship To All “
      In the same class as “All religions are equal, but Buddhism is foremost “.

      • 3
        1

        Nice one

      • 1
        0

        “All religions are equal, but Buddhism is foremost “

        You got it. “Special status of Buddhism”

  • 3
    14

    Mr. Jehan Perera

    Do you have the details of the “top secret agreements” signed by your President with India’s Prime Minister during the latter’s visit to Sri Lanka? The secrecy of the agreements implies that they are treacherous.
    Sri Lanka’s Constitution does not allow the President to enter into agreements with other countries unilaterally. If such agreements violate Constitutional clauses that safeguards the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Sri Lanka, then the government is required to obtain approval of people through a Referendum in order to implement their terms.
    Sri Lanka’s territorial integrity is unique as it does not share any borders with other countries. Any changes to that requires an amendment to the Constitution and that amendment needs the approval from Parliament and a Referendum. It is simple logic. On the other hand, Sri Lanka is not in a desperate situation to sign a defence agreement with India. Who gave legal advice to the President on these agreements? I could not find any information about NPP’s treacherous agreements with India.

    • 3
      2

      ” Sri Lanka is not in a desperate situation to sign a defence agreement with India.”
      Didn’t JR signed an agreement with India without a referendum?
      In this spirit, you had, in the course of our discussions agreed to meet some of India’s concerns as follows:

      Your Excellency and myself will reach an early understanding about the relevance and employment of foreign military and intelligence personnel with a view to ensuring that such presences will not prejudice Indo-Sri Lankan relations.
      Trincomalee or any other ports in Sri Lanka will not be made available for military use by any country in a manner prejudicial to India’s interests.
      The work of resotoring and operating the Trincomalee Oil Tank Farm will be undertaken as a joint venture between India and Sri Lanka.
      Sri Lanka’s agreements with foreign broadcasting organizations will be reviewed to ensure that any facilities set up by them in Sri Lanka

      • 2
        1

        “Didn’t JR signed an agreement with India without a referendum?”
        Was he not desperate at the time?

        • 1
          0

          “Was he not desperate at the time?”
          For What?

      • 0
        6

        Ajith
        You ask, “Didn’t JR sign an agreement with India without a referendum?”
        For your information, JRJ signed a “Peace Accord” with Rajiv Gandhi to make India agree to not take any action that violates the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Sri Lanka which safeguarded the country. Unlike Anura Kumara, JRJ didn’t sign the agreement in secrecy and the contents of the agreement which were in line with our Constitution were made available to citizenry.
        Defence Agreements, especially with India, need meticulous scrutiny so as not to undermine the three fundamental principles of our Constitution.
        Moreover, India has never been our friend or a trustworthy neighbour. India orchestrated, funded and trained LTTE terrorists destroyed civilian lives and economic centres for three decades. India has a long history of meddling in Sri Lankan elections.
        Anura Kumara is a proxy of Basil Rajapaksa and LTTE diaspora who funded and organized election campaigns of the former.

        • 4
          0

          “Moreover, India has never been our friend or a trustworthy neighbour.”
          What about Sri Lanka? Are you a friend?

    • 11
      0

      Champa,

      Why isn’t Wimal Weerawansa fasting/protesting unto death? Is there a shortage of lemon puffs?

      They are available here …… just say the word ….. they’ll be jetting on their way.

      Cometh the hour, cometh the man.

    • 9
      0

      Champa

      “Sri Lanka’s territorial integrity is unique as it does not share any borders with other countries. “

      Maldives, Cyprus, Falkland, Australia, News Zealand, Artic, Antarctic, …….. Madagascar, Britain, Japan, Taiwan, ……;….too do not share any borders with other countries.
      So what?

      Kachative, Pungudutive, ….. too do not share any borders with other countries.
      So what?

      ” Any changes to that requires an amendment to the Constitution and that amendment needs the approval from Parliament and a Referendum. “

      Weeping Widow and Clever Dick JR altered the constitution without being put to referendum. Who had the b***s to stop both new constitutions being approved in the parliament?

      Remember NPP has more than 2/3 majority in the parliament.

      “……. Sri Lanka is not in a desperate situation to sign a defence agreement with India.”

      Hindians do not need agreements to interfere in this island.
      Do you seriously think Hindians need agreements to interfere in another of their own states, I mean Sinhala State of Hindia?

      Please stop being childish, go away revisit history, come back and tell us your fairy tales when even Hindias regional commander Shavendra Silva is maintaining silence.

    • 8
      0

      Champa,
      “Sri Lanka’s territorial integrity is unique as it does not share any borders with other countries.”
      Your understanding of the word “unique” is, shall we say, unique.

    • 1
      0

      Dear Jehan
      As usual a comprehensive article, thanks for same
      If recollecting vaguely your write ups on PM Modiji’s previous visits during RW and MS regimes , were somewhat different if not controversial.. Then its journalism and changing times demands changes

      Dear Champa
      I do not know why you are sceptical on on most things
      I suppose it’s your rite to. express your view After all it’s a free press all intense and circumstances
      Ratnam Nadarajah

  • 4
    0

    ” India First With Friendship To All . ” Wow , Wow Wow . What a magic
    and Historic Invention ! In 1971 during April insurgency , It was China
    that guarded Colombo ? I P K F in Srilanka between 1987 and 1990 was from
    Ukraine ? Geographically we are neighbours of Switzerland ? The truth is
    India first for us is not our choice but We Have No Other Ways . My view ,
    and strictly my view is J R J with his open economy tried to make the West
    first with friendship to all including Cuba but we got cold water from Indira
    Gandhi and M G R . So , India is first not thanks to anybody else , that is printed
    on our foreheads .

  • 1
    1

    Who can answer the question: “What was contained in those MOUs signed between Sri Lanka and India”? No one not even the Government. Why? These MOUs are written words that are interpretative and unpredictable until “Occasions” and “Circumstances” surface. Until such time, what can be done is only to express concerns and doubts about what would happen when those “occasions” and “Circumstances” arise. Please listen to the following link of such “Interpretation” and Doubts”.

    https://youtu.be/LlPqu_fqvEQ?si=XP1sMrHK38RKHI4Y

    This mentions one “NGO” that has been in operation in Sri Lanka for many years of which the “Head” is one Milinda Moragoda – USA Citizen, a Cabinet Minister of JRJ, and immediately past the High Commissioner to India in the MRA Government with “Cabinet” status. This background information is important to understand the video from its perspective.

  • 2
    0

    … India First With Friendship To All
    This is a remedy for disaster.
    – Friendship To All will eventually leave you with no friend.
    – India First has to be an undeclared stand.

    • 0
      0

      Correctly, – India First With Friendship To All, is a recipe for disaster.

  • 1
    0

    “Traditional Elite backgrounds”
    It is true that both Modi & AKD did not have ‘ELITE’ backgrounds. Both came from financially not wealthy backgrounds. It shows that anybody can become the HEAD of the State/country. This fact should be emphasised by all the teachers up and down the country to their pupils.
    I wish to point out that Modi supported RSS [ Hindu Fundamentalist organisation] and AKD was associated with JVP [an organisation that supported violence against the State].

  • 1
    0

    “In the past there has been a trust deficit between the two countries.”
    This TRUST DEFICIT is not going to disappear with the “MIND SET OF THE MAJORITY” who live in a supposed to be a paradise Buddhist country. The author is supposed to be promoting peace and harmony in the country and I feel he is doing a terribly bad job. The enmity/jeolousness that is deeply ingrained in Singhalese masses is DIFFICULT to get rid of. Had they [Sinhala Buddhist Fundamentalists[SBF]
    treated Tamils in SL as equal citizens we do not have been begging other countries especially India or China.
    AKD has NOT still proven that he is TRUE SL Statesman YET. Hopefully once the Local Government Elections are over AKD will bring about true reconciliation between different religious and Ethnic groups.

  • 5
    0

    Douglas

    “This background information is important to understand the video from its perspective.”

    Don’t forget if the leaders, state and its institutions do not treat people well strangers and neighbours always find ways and means to grope man, women and children.

    • 2
      0

      NV: You are correct. All these NGOs are manned by that “Elite” class who are a bunch of vultures waiting to grab the prey. They patiently wait until the opportunity arises and pounce on the prey. If you see the operations of this “Path Finder” headed by Milinda Moragoda, it is one such “Smooth Operator” in Sri Lanka. Perhaps you might remember how they affiliated with Norway and amazed wealth during the LTTE time. This is no doubt a plague. Look at the “Team” of Donald Trump’s administration headed by Elon Mask.

  • 9
    0

    “Every man is a prisoner of his time” …….. but more importantly every event is a prisoner of its time.

    First and foremost, Lanka should have Lanka’s interest at heart in anything it signs. Especially long-term agreements (can’t make the same mistake JR made …… write a bespoke constitution just for the 12 years of his rule. That screwed the country up ever since.)

    For the simple reason, no one knows – including India – what the future policy/mindset of India and it’s future leaders going to be.

    Things can change in a millisecond.

    What I wrote …… way back then ……… https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/rajapaksas-in-the-dock/


    I’m almost 10 years older …… Native is still juvenile juvenile ……. OC is shrewdly smoothly juvenile.

    Nothing much has changed in a decade. ……. Except India’s way of courting Lanka …….

    Who among ye suspect …… India is taking lessons from OC ……. in the art of seduction?

    He should have tuition classes all over the island, except Bandarawela …… and the world …….. he’ll be richer than Musk!

  • 2
    0

    Jehan
    .
    The JVP has a long history of opposing foreign involvement in strategic national assets, especially when it comes to India. Back in the early 2000s, they were vocally against Ranil Wickremesinghe’s efforts to lease out the Trincomalee oil tank farm to India, citing national security and sovereignty concerns. They painted it as a sellout to a foreign power, especially given the sensitive geo-political location of Trincomalee.
    .
    Similarly, the Sampur coal power plant — which was a joint Indo-Lankan initiative — also faced fierce opposition from the JVP. They raised both environmental and nationalist concerns, warning against ceding too much control to India and compromising local interests.
    .
    So yeah, it’s definitely ironic to see how positions may have shifted (or mellowed) over time, or how some parties go quiet on these issues depending on who’s in power or what alliances are at stake. Politics in Sri Lanka tends to be quite cyclical that way — lots of noise in the opposition, but a different tune when the tables turn.
    .
    Do you feel like they’ve lost the ideological clarity they once had? Or is it more about practical compromises in today’s landscape?

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.