10 August, 2020

Blog

Legal Types Smell Blood: Mursi’s And Rajapakse’s

By Kumar David

Prof Kumar David

Legal types smell blood: Mursi’s and Rajapakse’s: Purblind Executive Presidents

Pakistan’s President Mushaaraf suffered shipwreck when he dismissed Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry unconstitutionally. The mobilisation the judiciary and lawyers lit-up, roused society at large as the public, anywhere, become agitated when it fears fair dispensation of justice is imperilled. It took a year or two to get to the grill, but once the fire was ablaze, Mushaaraf was fried bacon. Last week in this column I drew attention to the publicity coup President Mursi pulled off by leadership in crafting the Gaza ceasefire, and expressed the hope that he would use the prestige to sort out Egypt’s messy internal problems. The anxieties that have pushed him into recent controversial actions are concerns that I share; but he has been brash. This folly will cost him face; already by conceding, within a week, that his decree is “only temporary”, he has been compelled to climb down. Still Mursi, unlike his local counterpart, has flexibility and sense.

No meliorating concession can be granted to the Lankan regime and the nasty slap it landed on the face of the judiciary; it’s a Machiavellian power grab to subvert the division of powers and whip the judiciary into subordination. In its folly, the regime picked the very moment when its position is at a nadir, to start the witch-hunt. I have been saying for weeks that the fourth quarter of 2012 is the turning point of Rajapakse’s fortunes, the juncture at which decline and fall commenced. The CJ-issue may not be Waterloo, the final denouement; but it is Stalingrad, the twist in the road after which it will be retreat, all the way to a shrouded bunker.

Unlike the Lankan witch-hunt, sponsored by a 113 strong lynch-mob, in fealty to an overlord who tells it when to whistle and when to whip, when to sign a blank sheet and when to mount bogus charges, in Egypt there is an ongoing struggle on the streets. The revolution is not complete; the powers behind the old regime have not been vanquished; they lurk and they threaten the gains of the revolution. The poor political acumen, of Muslim Brotherhood and secular revolutionaries alike, has split the popular movement just when unity is most needed to flush out reactionary residues.

Action and reaction

Many Constitutional and Supreme Court judges and the Chief Public Prosecutor (till recently) are hardened Mubarak era diehards. This Court dismissed an elected parliament and dissolved the Constitutional Assembly earlier in 2012. Hundreds of unarmed protestors were killed in 2011 by state forces, but the Prosecutor dragged his feet and failed to secure a single conviction. Then it leaked out that the Court was plotting to dissolve the reconstituted Assembly, again, thus leaving the country ‘constitutionless’; in constitutional limbo in perpetuity. This was intolerable, prevarication impossible. For this reason, though massive demonstrations demand that Mursi rescind his ill-considered decree, the Muslim Brotherhood too is able to mobilise equally large demonstrations in its support. Qualms about dark Mubarak era inciters and recalcitrant elements in the military stirring trouble to discredit the revolution or even make a power grab, are justified.

Mursi’s decree brought sweeping powers into his hands and placed the judiciary under control (what is being attempted in Lanka, by stealth). Elated by praise for theGazaceasefire he issued the decree the next day in an effort to consolidate power. He prohibited the Courts from dissolving the Constituent Assembly, a necessary step, and dismissed the prosecutor for a more popular alternative, also necessary. These steps revolutionaries should support, but by framing the decree in general terms, Mursi overreached. He raised hackles by not engaging in consultation with the radicals and neglecting alliance building.Egypt’s secular revolutionaries too have time and again been dunderheads – in the runoff presidential elections they called for a boycott, which if successful would have handed victory to a pro-Mubarak, military backed, reactionary. The secular movement lacks leaders with political maturity and vision, the Brotherhood is cack-handed and naïve, all this is not good. Nevertheless, there is time for realignment on both sides, but not much.

The confrontation at one point became very violent; offices of the Brotherhood inPort Said, Ismalia,Suezand other towns were set ablaze by angry mobs and one of its supporters killed. The country’s entire legal profession is on strike. Mursai miscalculated and in climbing down he will give away more to the reactionaries than if the Brotherhood and secular revolutionaries had strategised better in the first place. He is now reduced to the un-presidential chore of negotiating with the judges for a compromise. It is astonishing that the anti-Mubrak forces which have an unfinished democratic revolution on their hands can’t get together and formulate a common minimum programme. The sine qua non for this is that the Brotherhood sets aside its dystopian objective of a Sharia compliant constitution. Islamic law cannot be imposed on a much modernised nation likeEgypt. The time of such antiquated relicts is long gone; whatever obsolete opium the large pool of old humanity in the countryside still smokes.

Confronting the lynch-mob

The statement presented by the CJ and her lawyers at their meeting with the Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) is extraordinary for its courage and determination. Clearly, the lady intends to fight, and thank god for that! The submission is explicit in its choice of adjectives to describe each charge; “baseless, groundless, frivolous, false or malicious”, as appropriate. The declaration has to be one hundred percent accurate on matters of fact; no way can it risk inaccuracy. I read it several times with this in mind, found it persuasive and concluded that the charge-sheet is frivolous and foolish. The submission levels the thinly veiled counter-charge that the accuser’s intention is to malign the CJ and harm her reputation; that is, to set up a lynching. This aligns with widespread public perceptions and fears. (The full text can be read on the Colombo Telegraph website; currently Lanka’s top web portal. It has been blacked-out by all local media; whether for of legal reasons, I do not know).

The state of play inEgyptis different from Lanka though superficially similar;Egyptis post revolutionary, the masses are on the streets. In Lanka the regime is in decline, the opposition divided, the people torpid. It is likely that the UPFA will use its blunderbuss majority to drive out the CJ. If the regime backs down it will be only to save its own skin; it has no use for truth and law. If it fears that the repercussions of a lynching may setoff a backlash to its own disadvantage, then it may hold back.

Lanka must hope that the courage sustaining the CJ will not desert her when the going gets tough, as it will. Men in politics these days are like women, cowering under desks in Sri Kotha – all of them. Bikku Sobitha, the best prospective Single Issue presidential challenger, did his bit in the Supreme Court, challenging the unlawful PSC. (The Court decided not to make an interim order and held its horses for now). The Thero, and other theros, need to continue; to march like Martin Luther and to nail their testament, in full public view, to the trees, to the doors and to the parapet walls,.

It is important that CJ, and reciprocally the public, understand that she is not fighting only for herself. In doing so, and in the style of doing so, she is fighting for all of us. If they throw her out on the street, I hope she has the gumption to pick herself up like Iftikhar Chaudhry, dust off the grime, and give direction to the anger that has gripped the legal profession and is agitating ever widening layers of the public. In this country were men in politics have lost their balls, become co-opted or turned toady clients, how breathtaking if a woman’s courage can demonstrate that she has big ones. By this, the CJ can earn forgiveness for her own sins; after all, full repentance, penitence, contrition, remission, oblation and sacrifice have to be made for letting the Eighteenth Amendment slip though. 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    0

    “By this, the CJ can earn forgiveness for her own sins; after all, full repentance, penitence, contrition, remission, oblation and sacrifice have to be made for letting the Eighteenth Amendment slip though”. Well said
    as you have guessed the verdict due by 8th – the MR Astrological date (8)
    used in SL Governance!!

  • 0
    0

    Oh! What an Article? I admire this writer so much. Tears falling down my eyes. Can not see what I am typing.

  • 0
    0

    Regime is now in an inextricable position with a kangaroo court and barefoot judges in its backyard. Caught red handed with sarongs up. Rajapakse has indeed made us the wonder of asia. Only option is to burn the constitution and have the chintana instead.

  • 0
    0

    Kumar D now thinks that legal types smell blood … Just 3-4 months ago, he thought that academia types smelled blood … Six months ago, he thought that military general types smells blood … Nothing seems actually capable of smelling the blood … All came crashing down to earth smelling not other’s blood but their own blood ….

    By the way, Kumar, you SLIPPED a gem called ‘reality’ through your ending of the article …
    “By this, the CJ can earn forgiveness for her own sins; after all, full repentance, penitence, contrition, remission, oblation and sacrifice have to be made for letting the Eighteenth Amendment slip though.”

    All these interpretations of constitution is not absolute and anything could be slipped through, as Kumar D admits here.
    Kumar’s buddy (whose one and only desire as kD’s to do a ‘regime change’ by any means) former CJ Sarath S is boasting about his interpretations of the constitution … Eventhough I am not a fan of Sarath S, I like the decisions he took interpreting the constitution like “demerging north and south” and not blocking the PERSON being the president who eliminated terrorists …
    This is the bottome line deciding which side you are in this debate, Kumar … Because, “people are supreme” , country is supreme … I am against anybody who decides against the country … May be he/she is just interpreting constitution … But, I know interpreting anything ambiguous is not absolute … It has thousands of variables and one of which is the baggage interpreter carry …. ‘From which side you are interpreting’ is the most important thing for me … side of ‘Colombian’ or the side of overwhelming Srilankan majority. .. I am for the latter …

    • 0
      0

      Kumar is only rhetoric! He contradicts himself article after article. His single issue hero shifted from Rev Sobhitha to Former Gen SF advised by Former CJ Sararth N Silva. Now he is implying Shirani B even if thrown out would stand to lead the fight! He seems desperate in finding some scare crow as an alternate to MR instead of discussing a political alternative. Poor guy. Political tourists who visit Colombo,, think Colombo is Sri Lanka!

  • 0
    0

    You support the “overwhelming Sri Lankan Majority” ? The buffaloes who voted these jokers in and continue to support them ?

    So we know what you stand for UMBAAAAAAto.

  • 0
    0

    Umbatoo

    stands for Sinhala fascism and nothing else. He thinks this way he may get all the lands and wealth owned by the minorities.

    Go and ask Gota for the millions he got from the LTTE and see whether he is willing to share with the ordianary sinhalese.

    This is not about us or them ie. sinhala or tamil but between the rich sinhala and pooer sinhala, the tamils and beating tamils are just an excuse to become rich. It is not going to change the condition of umbattoo who will have to keep sucking on the dry lolipop…

    • 0
      0

      Just be another pannan kotte racist fker pounding his meat in anger and frustration.
      Why are disgust and morality always equated with fear? What YOU should be “afraid” of is the following: a fecal smear and its bacteria count.

  • 0
    0

    Mursi is trying to discard the remnants of Mubarak’s corrupt Justice System while Rajapakse appoints corrupt officials to stay corrupt and keep the system corrupt.

    Moral and Ethical values have to be in place before Rule of Law can be Applied. Example, Knowledge will be ineffective if the Heart is Corrupt, Money is of no Value at the Cost of Health.

    Treat the people equally in your court and give them equal attention, so that the noble shall not aspire to your partiality, nor the humble despair of your justice.

    JUDICIAL GUIDELINES FROM ‘UMAR BIN AL-KHATTAB, THE SECOND KHALIFA OF ISLAM

    • 0
      0

      Nothing but the word of almighty Allah as spoken by prophet Muhammad pbuh is at Fahmy’s heart.
      Leela

    • 0
      0

      Cyrus the Great of Persia is the Father of Human rights to this world that we can see with our eyes but unfortunately the Arabic Muslims persecuted and drove his descendantsthe Zoroastrians away from their homeland known today as Iran. Today the Ayatollahs/Mullahs loving friends of Rajaporkistan hold the world record for using the death penalty per inhabitant using unfair trials;45 hanged and 1000 in death row the last month – they are your Allah people go pray there first because Rajaporkistan is a racist Sinhala Buddhist tyrant he just needs your goat and vote. Oil exports have halved and the riyal value halved last October your brothers and sisters believers are suffering. A nation with rights for the individual not race, religion cast creed etc. then there is respect- state must be separated from the faith as we see in the west to be peaceful.Even your Jinnaha(petit) and Indira(gandhi) married Zoroastrians Good luck Hombre.

    • 0
      0

      BTW you are the decedents of the Mughals of north India (read history of Mughals conquest by Percy brown). The Arabs who ruled southern Europe i.e. Spain/Portugal for 800 years came over to Kerala frequently to ferry “pepper corn” the currency of Europe and did not have time for a Ceylonese wife while carrying money for the whole of Europe (sexy girls there). It was Gujarat that took Islam all the way to Indonesia and also gave refuge to the Zoroastrians. When Queen Isabella who married the Portuguese King drove the Arabs right down to the north of Africa she built the Spanish armada learnt from the Arabs and sent Vasco da Gama, 1st Count of Vidigueira and Christopher Columbus of País Basque to the north Americas.

  • 0
    0

    I don’t think that the Chief Justice will lose this battle if she and her colleagues on the bench continue to stand for justice and the rule of the law unbowed by the intimidatory tactics and mud slinging being carried out by the agents of the state. The Speaker may reject a notice served on the PSC members by the Supreme Court, but is there any authority who can reject an interpretation of the Constitution given by the Supreme Court? The interpretation of the Constitution comes under the sole jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. Therefore, the judiciary still holds the whip hand. We have to remember that the Chief Justice would emerge the heroine be it victory or the defeat for the judiciary. Perhaps she might be offered a top post in the UN! But a defeat for the judiciary means the end of democracy in this country!

  • 0
    0

    I am astonished & surprised to see some ruling regime crooks like Max Silva appearing in different names like Bruno Umbato etc after getting clean bowled out from this CT forum.

    Shameless crooks are plenty in SriLanka.

  • 0
    0

    Wrong. Wrong. Wrong
    That is Pakistan. This is Sri Lanka.
    Musharaf did not have Political Expereince. Obviously, he was military leader.
    Mahinda Rajapaksha has a long long political experience and history.
    Also, he is a executive presdent with so much powers provided by Sri Lankan Constitution.
    This is wrong assesment by a professior.

  • 0
    0

    Even the mighty of the mightiest like Hitler had his own Wartaloo.Why not MR?

  • 0
    0

    Every dog has its day!

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.