23 May, 2022


The Parliament Has Spoken

By Mass L. Usuf

මාස් එල්. යූසුෆ්

With the swearing in of the Member of Parliament Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa as the Prime Minister on 26th October 2018, President Sirisena literally placed the whole nation in harm’s way. Thank God, sanity prevailed and what would otherwise had been a blood bath was averted.  

The Brussels based International Crisis Group (ICG) had this report filed. “On 26 October, Sri Lanka’s President Maithripala Sirisena abruptly dismissed the prime minister, Ranil Wickremesinghe, and appointed controversial former President Mahinda Rajapaksa to the premier’s post, in a move that contravenes the constitution and threatens to destabilise the country. Rajapaksa’s appointment has already emboldened his supporters, with their actions provoking violence. More unrest is likely as the president and the new prime minister seek to consolidate support. The struggle for power jeopardises progress on reforms, ethnic reconciliation, and prospects for peaceful and fair elections in 2019.” (Crisis Group Asia Briefing N°152, Brussels, 31 October 2018).

It further noted that the power struggle now underway between Rajapaksa and Wickremesinghe has already turned violent, with the new prime minister’s supporters attempting to stop a recently ousted minister from entering his office and clashing with his security detail. Risks of further bloodshed are high, particularly if mass protests by Wickremesinghe loyalists continue over the coming days.

International Pariah

This move was a rash and negligent act for which the President should be held responsible. Besides placing the country on the brim of violence, he had by his imprudent act tarnished the image of one of the oldest democracies in South Asia. He also placed the economic interests of Sri Lanka in jeopardy.  Foreign governments and organisations were reconsidering their economic support which were linked to democratic governance. The threat of European Union withdrawing preferential trade benefits, only restored to Sri Lanka in 2017 was imminent due to the unconstitutional change of power. The U.S. was urged by the ICG to immediately suspend the process for final approval of $450 million in economic development funding from the Millennium Challenge Corporation. Japan was reviewing the loan for the light rail project.  In an unprecedented move ICG also recommended that Governments should begin to consider applying targeted sanctions against Sirisena, Rajapaksa, their families and their close associates should Sri Lanka’s constitutional coup proceed.

Abuse of Power

Following the appointment of the new Prime Minister, the alliance of the dismissed Prime Minister Ranil Wickremasinghe were fully geared to meet in Parliament. The institution where they have to test as to who commanded the majority in the Parliament according to the Constitution. To add salt to injury and of course, most unethically, President Sirisena committed another act of impudence by proroguing the Parliament on 27 October 2018. Thereby, depriving the floor test to ascertain majority in Parliament.  Political analysts viewed the act of prorogation as a means of buying time to garner support for the new Prime Minister.  The President by virtue of the powers vested in him by Article 70 of the Constitution can prorogue Parliament.  However, given the circumstances and the timing of the order to prorogue Parliament, arguably the question arises if there has been an abuse in the use of such power.

The President is expected to act not inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution and custom or usage. The duties in relation to the Constitution is stated as follows: 

Article 33 “(1) It shall be the DUTY of the President to –

(a) ensure that the Constitution is respected and upheld;”

Article 33 (2) The President shall have the POWER –

“(h) to do all such acts and things, not inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution or written law, as by international law, custom or usage the President is authorized or required to do.”

According to the Constitution, the President is responsible to the Parliament.  The Article 33A reads as follows:

“The President shall be responsible to Parliament for the due exercise, performance and discharge of his powers, duties and functions under the Constitution and any written law, including the law for the time being relating to public security.”

Did the President exercise the powers vested in him in the proper manner? Were his actions reasonable? Were they in conformity with the principles of natural justice?  The power given to the President is not absolute power. It is power that has been granted subjected and conditioned by the provisions of the Constitution. He cannot, therefore, act like a monarch or like a dictator.  The notion of the President being responsible to the Parliament is evident of the lack of absolute power in him.

Dying cancer Patients

The illegal horse trading that took place following the appointment and the prorogation were all the direct consequential effect of the initial cause of dismissal of the sitting Prime Minister.  Everyone is aware of the hundreds of millions of rupees that was being offered to shamelessly buy over members of parliament. Therefore, his initial act, which is widely held as unconstitutional, then paved the way for several other acts of illegality to be committed to fulfil the needs of the initial cause namely, to secure a majority in Parliament.  In disgust the public was commenting that these politicians had no money to install a Pet Scanner at the Maharagama Cancer hospital which cost around Rs. 200 million and would have served thousands of dying cancer patients.  Instead, they are prepared to spend more than this amount for head hunting to satiate their greed for political power.

Judiciary Not Dead

Then came the gazette notification of the dissolution of parliament. Analysts opined that it was a desperate move by the President as he had by then reached the dead end. The required support did not come forth despite the illegal horse trading. Also, as one of his many stupid statements, the President said that he will not remain as President for even an hour if the dismissed Prime Minister reassumes duties. The dissolution was challenged and the Supreme Court has granted a stay order on the notification.  Since it is sub judice, I will refrain from commenting except to say that the stay order was acknowledged by everyone and faith in the independence of judiciary has increased tremendously.

Dissolution After No Confidence

The Parliament was summoned today 14th November 2018 as per the earlier gazette notification and the floor test proved that the newly appointed Prime Minister did not have the confidence of the majority in Parliament. Therefore, he was constitutionally and democratically ousted from his post. It is now the duty of the President to appoint a new Prime Minister as per Article 42 (4) which states:

“The President shall appoint as Prime Minister the Member of Parliament, who, in the President’s opinion, is most likely to command the confidence of Parliament.”

Moreover, with the Prime Minister removed by a vote of no confidence in Parliament the Cabinet of Ministers also stands dissolved. Article 48 (1) states:

“On the Prime Minister ceasing to hold office by death, resignation or otherwise, ….. , the Cabinet of Ministers shall, ….  , stand dissolved and the President shall appoint a Prime Minister, Ministers of the Cabinet of Ministers, Ministers who are not members of the Cabinet of Ministers and Deputy Ministers in terms of Articles 42, 43, 44 and 45.”

Therefore, the President has to also appoint a new Cabinet of Ministers.

There is however a proviso to Article 48 (1) which stipulates:

“Provided that if after the Prime Minister so ceases to hold office, Parliament is dissolved, the Cabinet of Ministers shall continue to function with the other Ministers of the Cabinet as its members, until the conclusion of the General Election. The President may appoint one such Minister to exercise, perform and discharge the powers, duties and functions of the Prime Minister, and the provisions of Article 47 shall, mutatis mutandis, apply.”

At present the Parliament cannot be dissolved immediately after today’s no confidence motion as the matter of dissolution is sub judice.  Therefore, the President has no option but to appoint the Prime Minister and the Cabinet of Ministers. He better acts constitutionally in doing so without further exacerbating the mess he himself had created.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 3

    “The Parliament Has Spoken”. Try telling that to MS and MR.

  • 1

    With so many of our Hamba (temporary) residents in parliament, it is not surprising that any antinational motion can be passed with the right number of dollar notes from the US embassy. Without mentioning names, look at Fowzi, Mujiber, Bathurdeen, and tens of others who are deciding the future of our country!

    Donald Trump is right in wanting the final solution.

  • 4

    Mara Sira should resign if they had any decency in them.

    • 0

      Yes, fully agree.
      But Mara must resign first and a UNF PM be appointed immediately.
      If Sira resigns now, Mara, as current PM (albeit illegally) as per the Constitution, automatically succeeds him as president.
      I reckon the Supreme Court didn’t take into consideration the possibility of this type of third rate behaviour by Sira and Mara when they issued the Interim Relief Order.
      Sira can either choose to resign or be impeached after the UNF PM is in place.

  • 1

    Yes parliament has spoken and today right now they are physically testing each other in our parliament. So Long parliament,democrazy and constipation or sorry constitution.

  • 0

    You Tube and social media is having a field day with direct telecast from Lankan parliament. Lankan Style WWF. Lot of noise but no real action.

  • 3

    This move was a rash and negligent act for which the President should be held responsible

    All would have to accept the decision of the Supreme Court, the Chairman of the National Elections Commission said in Matara today during an awareness programmer. this what the foreign government are after concerning the country security risks and method/ provide for a peace building environment.

  • 5

    Is there any law in the country to take legal action on MPs like Rambukwella, Aluthgamage,Ranweera, Amunugama , Jayakody, Nissanka, Semasinghe, Ranasinghe, foer disrupting the proceeding of Parliament and causing damage to public property. The fellows must go to jail

  • 1

    Slayer federal reserves ran out of Chinese renminbi paying TNA and UNP MP,S ( also some of MR people will not accept Chinese crap they want it only in US $) . You talking about horse trading. Try telling this to Lankan public.

  • 0

    Let people speak. It is the People who have the ultimate authority.

    • 4

      Shenali the stupid unhappy Waduge

      “Let people speak. It is the People who have the ultimate authority.”

      Is it so?
      Why did they elect those MP’s if they could speak on every issue, after every coup, ………………….. They spoke on 8th January 2015 broadly and then they elected their representatives on 17 August 2015.
      Read below this is what Hopper Sirisena told the public on 1 August 2017:

      “The next general elections will be held in three years and those attempting to destabilize the country and disrupt public life through protests and strikes must realize they will not be allowed to change this government until 2020, President Maithripala Sirisena said today.”

      What is the hurry?

      This is a representative democracy and not an Athenian direct democracy hence leave the representatives to deal with issues until the next election not due until 2020 according to Hopper Sirisena.

      • 0

        Hay Lansi Vedda,

        People elect representatives when they want, but are free to ask for direct elections when they like. Your Belgique ancestors may not have taught these ethics to you while you were busy stealing land. But that is the democratic practice.

        It is thieves like you who incide thugs like Thevarapperuma to bring kris knives to your oh-so-sacred legislature.

        Be ashamed you dishonest crook (though I don’t expect you to know shame).

        • 0

          How many people would like to have elections now?
          Why not? I have elaborated elsewhere.

  • 4

    All what has happened in Sri Lanka upto this minute, the President should be held responsible.
    How can you expect Grama Niladhari’s to become a President of a country and bring it to this down trodden level. I am ashamed of you Mr. President for bringing this beautiful country to this rotten level. Think of a way out.

  • 2

    Shenal, People have already spoken and you are stone deaf.

  • 0

    Mass L usuf

    Majority people like dismissing RW so the president is right.

    The speaker is controversial too so find a new speaker.

    Refuse MR too & then president will appoint another UNP MP for PM ship. UNP accept it.

    That’s how this problem can be solved.

    What’s this ICG?

    Don’t care for it.

    They don’t know the ground situation.

    They’re probably misinformed to think that RW is a saint.

  • 0

    Mass L. Usuf, we do not think that the Parliament has spoken the whole truth. Will we ever get to know the whole truth?

  • 1

    The Solution, as I see it is to put all three ie MS, MR and RW into a Cell, lock the Cell and throw the Key into the Sea. Look at the Savings to the Country, when you consider providing each of them Security, when just 2 Personal would be sufficient to guard the Cell. If this happens all other issues will be solved without much effort.

    • 0


      They too have a right to a lifespan. 70 years.
      So, Mahinda, right now.
      Ranil- a few months more.
      Sira will have 3 years more. This is a sensible suggestion by you.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.