19 March, 2025

Blog

Will They Be Willing To Face Tough Questions At A Public Forum?

By M.A. Sumanthiran and Shanakiyan Rasamanickam

The country is at cross-roads at the moment; A crucial pivotal point in our post-independence history. We were an economy with a surplus and an example for other to follow; even a model for Singapore’s Lee Kuan Yew.

We could afford to deliver free education up to tertiary level and free health services to all citizen, which is unmatched anywhere in the world. From such a lofty and healthy position, we have fallen into deep debt and have declared ourselves officially bankrupt. We have also fought a civil war for three decades and are still struggling to recover from its after-effects and achieve meaningful reconciliation. Corruption levels are one of the worst in the whole world that has pulled us down further. As a result of all these, two years ago, the citizens of this country revolted and took to the streets. They called for a total system change and brought about unimaginable changes relatively without violence. The finance minister of the country and the prime minister had to resign, and the president who was elected with a popular vote three years previously had to flee the country and then resign. Those changes were brought about not through conventional methods of election etc., but by popular uprising. Since then it is only now that the citizens will get an opportunity to express themselves democratically by casting their votes.

At this pivotal moment we have thought it necessary to place before the people a few crucial issues that need to be addressed radically if the country is to turn around and achieve peace and prosperity. We are members of Parliament elected from the Northern and Eastern provinces of this country, coming from the districts of Jaffna and Batticaloa, which are predominantly or almost totally inhabited by Tamil Speaking People, who are numerically the minority in the country. We represent a People who are yet struggling to achieve equal citizenship status and who at one time wanted to form a separate state and live independently for that very reason. Other Tamil speaking communities such as the Muslims and Malayagha Tamils also continue to labour under the yoke of majoritarianism. The issue of unreasonable forced cremation during COVID-19 and the disenfranchisement of Malayagha Tamils whose paltry salary scales are just examples of historic injustices against them as well. The majoritarian tendencies have affected the women of the country also in significant ways, which is seen by the abysmal representation they have despite being 52 % of the voting population.

The country became Bankrupt primarily due to financial mismanagement and corruption, and the civil war. To recover from the depths to which we have fallen, the assistance of International Monetary Fund (IMF) was sought. Well before the government seeking assistance from the IMF or declaring bankruptcy, we urged the government to go to the IMF but to take particular care with regard to the protection of the poor and vulnerable sections of our societies. It is telling that the IMF identified “corruption susceptibilities” as a major challenge to economic reform and followed it up with “governance diagnostics”, signalling another major weakness in the system. We find that the engagement with the IMF has not been handled properly resulting in the poor in our country being badly affected through this programme. Those below the poverty line have increased from 14% in 2019 and 30% now; there has been a huge brain drain in the country with professionals and those with skills to reactivate the economy leaving the country for better pastures and the poor also leaving for purposes of survival. The government effected a domestic debt restructure, which exclusively drew from the employees’ provident fund – the meagre savings of the working people of this country. Indirect taxes have been imposed placing a heavy burden on the poor, whilst many rich and powerful personalities continue to evade paying taxes with impunity. Business icon Dhammika Perera suddenly settling Rs. 1.15 Billion of default taxes just prior to be sworn in as a Member of Parliament is a case in point. The government has not taken any meaningful steps to collect direct taxes from so many defaulters who continue to pay bribes to avoid being prosecuted. The government’s tax policy is also warped in that simple solutions like rational tax on tobacco and alcohol is not implemented, presumably due to high corruption.

In this background there are several aspirants to high offices at the forthcoming Presidential and other elections. We have heard promises from all of them. We are a people who were promised rice from the moon and the abolishing of executive presidency within 6 months in 1994. Candidates have got used to giving promises blithely without ever intending to keep them. Presently there are three main candidates who are trying to convince an electorate that they will deal with corruption decisively. President Ranil Wickremesinghe is boasting that he has passed an effective law against corruption. It is true that such a law was passed and remains in our statute books. But that is where it remains! Not a single prosecution has been launched against any of the known corrupt transactions, except showcasing Keheliya Rambukwella. The political party that has kept Ranil Wickremesinghe in office is known to consist of some of the biggest fraudsters in the country. That is why they were kicked out of office by the people. And yet president Wickremesinghe hasn’t moved a muscle to bring any of them before the law. This and his long past record cannot suggest to the country that he will so much as lift even a finger against corruption if he is elected to the office of President. Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa has inherited most of the UNP of old. There are many of them in his ranks who are seasoned politicians and well known for their corruption. Although he has promised to set up an independent public prosecutor’s office sans a conflict of interest of the attorney generals department, can the constituency take seriously his promises? NPP leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake showed several files to the country not too long ago claiming that those were about corrupt deals of various politicians. However to-date he has not revealed to the country what those files contain. Can the country actually believe that corruption would be routed if he is elected to office.

If these persons are serious about their promises to eradicate corruption, will they be willing to face tough questions on these issues at a public forum. We are prepared to host a public event at which they will be given opportunities to answer such questions and convince the electorate. We call on all the serious contenders to the office of president to publicly announce their willingness to participate in such a forum. We can also use that forum to clarify from them questions with regard to how they will handle the economy from now on; how they will renegotiate with the IMF and the others for the benefit of the poor and the vulnerable; how the biggest income earners for the country – women in the plantations, garment factories and domestic workers abroad – will be empowered and given their due place in decision making and governance. They can also respond to questions on governance – the issue of executive presidency, which all three of them have at various points in time promised to abolish and the question of meaningful devolution of power to the people of different localities and provinces to ensure settlement of the most troublesome issue that the country has faced since independence and to become a true republic.

*M.A. Sumanthiran MP, Jaffna District –  Shanakiyan Rasamanickam MP, Batticaloa District

Latest comments

  • 11
    1

    A hard-hitting article, without hitting hard at any particular individual.
    .
    A Forum setting tough questions on the issues is being demanded.
    Good luck with that possibility.

    • 4
      5

      “A hard-hitting article, without hitting hard at any particular individual.”
      Firstly, the contents in the article in this forum is nothing new. Several experts and journalists have discussed in this forum. The authors of this article should clarify whether they represent any political party or it is their personal view. At least one of them were in the parliament for more than 10 years and worked closely with Ranil Wickremasinghe, Sajith Premadasa and AKD in the parliament. We have listened their speeches in Parliament. They were in a party that took opposition leader position and what was their success? If they don’t come for a public or answer their questions what is their position? They have already said they are against to a common candidate and work against it? Who is their choice? This is not an election to give your votes secretly to give in this parliament. This is an election vote by people. It is sad that these two individuals completely different view against their own political party.

      .

      • 5
        0

        Ajith,
        … a public event at which they will be given opportunities to answer such questions.
        A single platform with all 3 present.
        That is new to me.

    • 4
      0

      This upcoming Presidential election in my view is once in a generation event. In that everything is possible and no one a clear favourite
      Each leading candidates have an equal chance but the stakes are high
      Citizens Please , please exercise your vote prudently. You wouldn’t get a second chance

  • 6
    2

    After the bankruptcy, Ranil will need to answer all tough questions, especially regarding the IMF funds that were borrowed. It’s crucial to understand whether this loan is intended to foster self-sufficiency or merely to generate profit to repay the IMF, potentially burdening future Sri Lankans.
    Before the bankruptcy, no one foresaw the country’s economic collapse. Mismanagement is a primary reason for this crisis, and only the “Aragalaya” (the people’s movement) brought about significant change. The collective power of the people led to this transformation, Ranil, who had best support for the Aragalaya for his rise to power.
    People say that the NPP doesn’t have experience. However, President Obama did not have extensive experience before his presidency but successfully served two terms. Similarly, the first man who went to the moon had no previous experience. It is not just about experience but about vision, capability, and the drive to bring about positive change.

    • 5
      1

      “After the bankruptcy, Ranil will need to answer all tough questions, especially regarding the IMF funds that were borrowed. “
      Not only this question but also many other questions that lead to bankruptcy, Ranil is an appropriate person to answer these persons because he was the only person who is and who was in the governments for many decades as a minister, prime minister, opposition leader and now President. Sajith was part of him but not in full. AKD is least out of the three.

    • 1
      0

      RBH ,
      “Before the bankruptcy, no one foresaw the country’s economic collapse.”
      No, you are wrong. One person did see it, and deserves credit for it.

      https://www.newswire.lk/2021/11/16/we-will-not-go-to-imf-even-if-we-die-minister-vasudeva/

      • 0
        0

        Hello OC,
        Back in early 2021, I said to my wife that the economic conditions were going to get much worse in Sri Lanka, I am very skeptical of New Monetary Theory and explained to her that you cannot keep printing currency and not suffer consequences. I also saw the drop in Tourists and decline in remittances that contributed to the Foreign Reserves crisis, however I thought that the Government would go to the IMF before the Bankruptcy. Some you win some you lose.
        Best regards

  • 5
    2

    Thank you S & S!
    .
    I agree with your description of the situation.
    How do we propose to solve it? Please study the bare figures given as this opens:
    .
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_presidential_elections_in_Sri_Lanka
    .
    Two Sinhalese politicians always on top, always garnering 90% of the votes. Not surprising, considering that the Sinhalese are very much the majority community and that this election is one that is FPtP, treating the entire country as one electorate. Never have all the “other candidates” managed to cobble together more than 8.02% of the valid vote. All voters tend to vote along communal lines.
    .
    Why does almost no voter cast more than one preference? Because they are not even aware that such sophistication is possible. And why don’t the Political Parties inform them? Because most voters will mark X,2,3 leading to those ballots being rejected. I always mark three, and I’ve been saying so openly on this forum.
    .
    My FIRST goes to AKD; SECOND to Sarath Fonseka; THIRD to the “Common Tamil Candidate“.
    .
    A few days ago, I listened carefully to Sarath Fonseka for 52′:35″.
    .
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UY09PPitO6M&t=647s
    .

    I don’t like military personnel, but he was talking sense.

    .
    TBC

    • 2
      2

      Continuing
      .
      I now see
      this earlier interview with Fonseka; 1:09′:42″
      .
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vog_BgHy-l4
      .
      I will listen to it later because there also is AKD:
      .
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MiM2xr6SPuk

      .
      But here is Fonseka, speaking today for just a minute:
      .
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pxqd_vmRWzc
      .
      Time, and data even at low resolution, are a problem for me.
      .
      Fortunately, both of you understand Sinhalese. Please listen carefully to the three Fonseka interviews. We all know what AKD has been saying, but few have been listening to Fonseka.
      .
      My decision to vote for AKD
      .
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MiM2xr6SPuk
      .
      is firm. I know that the Preferences are not counted unless nobody reaches 50%+1. And, since only three Preferences are allowed, after a first round of inconclusive voting, there will be only two counts. Four Preferences will result in three counts. This counting of votes has been explained effectively by Mahinda Deshapriya.
      .
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mrz6RpzDaa4&t=186s
      .
      We have never yet have had inconclusive counts, and this ninth time, I expect 60% for Anura. I won’t be surprised if Fonseka is second. That’s how fed up people are with the rogues.
      .
      Yes, our two biggest problems are corruption and racism.
      .
      TBC

      • 0
        0

        SM,
        “Yes, our two biggest problems are corruption and racism.”
        Aren’t you aware that Fonseka has been accused of both?

    • 3
      2

      Continuing
      .
      However, this time,
      with one of the two of you contesting, the result could be more complicated. What if ALL 25% Tamil speakers were to vote for the “Common Tamil Candidate”? Then nobody may reach 50%+1.
      .
      Please attempt fielding a Common Tamil Candidate. The minorities have much to protest about! But register it as a “Protest Vote”. Ask your voters to indicate a Preference for AKD.</b>
      .
      This is shameless propaganda by me for the NPP. They are sincere in their desire to establish a society in which all citizen will be treated as equal.
      .
      I have been thinking these arguments out for a long time; it gets quite confusing. I’m not rethinking every detail. If I have over-simplified, I’m subject to correction; I’m waiting for comments lambasting me.

      .

      Panini Edirisinhe

  • 6
    0

    “citizens will get an opportunity to express themselves democratically by casting their votes.“
    Ceylon/SL voters had been voting in Elections since independence. The majority race of the country can be swayed easily to the promises such as “Sinhala Only”/ free rice and by vilifying the minorities. The various GoSL carried out State Sponsored against the minorities with the tacit approval or turning a blind eye by Sinhala Buddhist.
    It’s a vast of time to quiz the Presidential Hopeful as what ever they say is NOT what they are going to do after the winning the Election.
    The voters should vote for the Leader who will bring CHANGE to the way country is run Politically/Socially/Economically.
    Hopefully voters will place their TRUST on AKD only person’s hands are relatively CLEAN.
    Why don’t one of the AUTHOR contest the Presidential election???

    • 2
      1

      “Why don’t one of the AUTHOR contest the Presidential election???”
      A good and valuable thought!

      • 1
        0

        Is it a serious proposal for the newly announced Grand Alliance of Tamil nationalists?

  • 1
    0

    Typo error
    WASTE of time

  • 5
    0

    … Obama did not have extensive experience before his presidency.
    _ In USA, the President simply sets the direction. The bureaucrats make the decision.
    .
    … the first man who went to the moon had no previous experience.
    _ It is like saying, ‘When my wife gave birth, she has had no previous experience!’

  • 7
    0

    “Will They Be Willing To Face Tough Questions At A Public Forum?”
    /
    Aw, come on, Sumanthiran and Rasamanickam.
    That is the most unreasonable challenge you can throw at any Sinhala Buddhist politician!

  • 4
    1

    I looked forward to a debate between AKD & SP but it seemed SP chickened out that time. A mature debate between the serious contenders would give the voters an opportunity make an intelligent decision instead of being persuaded by biased writeups based on assumptions or unsubstantiated, even, contradictory, speeches by politicians themselves.

    I have watched several clips, mainly NPP interviews, on social media & the interviews appeared to be prearranged. The interviewer, probably, lacking in experience, always seemed to suck up to the interviewee, even putting words to the mouth, sometimes asking several questions in support of the main question, which requires several answers, instead of a precise unambiguous question that requires a straight answer. A professional would conduct the interview in a friendly, unbiased manner & should ask tough questions. Therefore, I have doubts if such a debate would be controlled independently by a moderator without participants deviating from the subject or going into ‘extra time’. Anyway, however the debate is conducted, it would be an opportunity to identify competent candidates who would support their answers with facts. In uk, such debates are monitored by a ‘fact check’ team & immediately rejected if false but such an outcome would be too much to ask for. Nevertheless, an unbiased debate with questions from the audience would be a sign of a free election without gimmicks & promises for enticing the voters as we are used to.

  • 0
    4

    Sumanthiran PC, putting unlimited hope for a minister position in Yahapalanaya Aanduwa, challenged that he would quit politics if he had not brought his hybrid federal system (not by name, but by structure,) in 2018. When it was sure that never Evil would allow anything as devolution to happen, Tamils questioned Sumanthiran about his resignation. He just simply bluffed that some solution is going to come after the 2019 election, that’s all what he meant by resigning from his polytricks. The man who cheated Tamils, who depended on him for the Secret Solution, now jumping to save Sinhalese from being cheated by Sinhala Buddhist Intellectuals from Systemic Change. They all are promising Systemic Change, the one for which Protesters toppled the Gothapayal’s Hitler Administration. As per Sumanthiran, in 2015, 99% + of the political parties received a mandate for Constitutional change with the removal of EP. In this election many of them are describing their pledge as also for Systemic Change, but in name as “Total Change”, like different terminologies. To differentiate the UNP-SLFP Union’s systemic change from what NPP is promising from the Protestors’ time, we said that if NPP defeats UNP-SLFP union, then it is itself the debut of systemic change.

  • 0
    3

    This can help the laymen to differentiate the systemic change UNP SLFP Union promised, and the one possibly would be introduced by NPP. If the UNP-SLFP union loses the election, then the fundamental ruling system of Langkang from 1948 would be changed.
    It is not anything complicated, but some additional lines are needed to make it understandable for lower class voters. The Systemic Change is closing the path the UNP-SLFP Union governments, time and again, without any space for democratic election process take place, so deterministically and resolutely having enthrone them on the chair. Either by hook or crook, and violently or cunningly they cheat the Sinhala Buddhists and deposit $30B in their account but the country is sold to whoever wants to peel it for their skin needs. Abolishing the UNP-SLFP Union election winning election system, which’s system is using Sinhala Buddhism to win one of them in the election and then they both, together rob, loot, steal, nepotism, kill, rape, smuggle, money laundering, granting impunity to each other.

  • 0
    3

    Though the winning engineered with Sinhala Buddhism create a mirage that the losers are only Tamils, but the truth is Tamils lost in the light, because the Sinhala Buddhism is the weapon used here, but in the shadow, Sinhalese too were made to pay a share, if not equal to Tamils, still heavy. Apparently, among the weak-lower-class Sinhala Buddhists, who have no better hand in government than Tamils, the share of retribution was equally heavy like Tamils, though are trained to be the first in line to lend hand to implement the Sinhala Buddhism. This is the situation Sumanthiran wants to use to educate the Sinhala Buddhists, though no Sinhalese would be going to any site of Tamils that talks about politics. If Sumanthiran understands that a Tamil standing as CC is only for Tamils, then he understands that the site he is going to operate is will be attended exclusively by Tamils, though even that cannot be confirmed.

  • 0
    4

    Instead of Sumanthiran PC deceiving Tamils that he is going to start a new site for Sinhalese to get answers on the Sinhala Buddhist election, let start the question-and-answer session in this website, it is now popular even within the international communities for its political commentary of Langkang. What do you think is going to come to Tamils from this election? A solution? Why did you say if a Sinhalese stands for EP election, that is for Tamils too, but if Tamils place CC, it is for Tamils only? Then where are you looking for your devolution to come from? Do you hope to hop into the spaceship going to the moon to fetch rice and you bring a few measures of devolution from the Moon for Tamils? Why did you ask Evil that time, after Kusal Perera wanted CV to become the EP and abolish the EP system and dismiss the parliament to elect a fully functional parliament, if Evil would back up CV as a candidate?

  • 0
    3

    Who is the person here, in the pictures above, who has so far promised to abolish the EP, which is fundamental for the type of devolution you suggest? If no one here is promising to abolish EP, then are you not betting with your devolution this time? It is not just naive; it is utter stupid to think that you can get your devolution from Sinhala Buddhist Intellectuals by pledging something agreeable to them. They won’t take your campaign support for their election needs. You remember how Old Rowdy wanted to have the UNP partners punished by UNHRC, so he can become the EP? Try something like that to have the UNP-SLFP Union punished by UNHRC so different units can come to the government.

    I tell you something, anybody coming as president will dismiss the parliament immediately after the EP election, other than the Slap Party candidate. So just go back to Jaffna, try hard to prevent you from being wiped out this time though you dodged it last time with the help of Sritharan MP. Otherwise, the Northern Tamils are going to extract what you promised last time, i.e. “quitting the politics. “It is an extreme comedy that you who have no strength to ask the Sinhala Buddhist in physical meetings what they are prepared to give now proposing to ask them on a site and pleading them support in return.

  • 0
    4

    Let’s see how many of the comments you come back and reply. That will limelight to the readers your sincere faith in the method you are proposing.

    “Thingal, Karai Irulai Neeka Karuthathulakil Nirai Irulai Neekume Ninru. First, create a site where you can answer the questions Tamils have about your shortcomings.

  • 4
    1

    The differences between Ranil, Sajith and AKD are Ranil is the only leader who brought in so many rules to maintain checks and balances in the Executive, parliament and the judiciary. Questioning his ability to implement them fully is not appropriate without giving him elected presidency and a majority in the parliament is unfair. He is also the only leader who promised to implement the 13th amendment to the extent feasible without getting caught by political landmines. On the other hand Sajith and AKD opposed any concessions to minority rights to appease the majority. Their recent overtures to the minority is fake and political opportunism to win votes. Hopefully MAS will support Ranil without misleading his constituency.

  • 3
    1

    In the wake of Rajapakses pulling out of supporting Ranil, I believe the Tamil people have an important role to play by getting on to the band wagon of Ranil and help him elected as President of Sri Lanka, so that he can finish the work he started in solving the problems of the people of Sri Lanka. Ranil’s association with the Rajapakses is only a marriage of convenience as the people of Sri Lanka often do not choose their leaders using their heads but falling for false propaganda. It is not a fluke that Ranil was able to steer the country out of economic catastrophe and brought in normalcy in just two years. Many countries including Pakistan and Bangaladesh studying and many others including Australia and Greece are admiring at the Sri Lankan miracle led by Ranil Wickremesinghe, a gentle who has no progeny to promote as his successors as opposed to others who want to inherit the legacies of their fathers (i.e., Sajith Premadasa and Namal Rajapakse), and he will support anyone with talent as his successor as long as it will help Sri Lanka to grow and prosper as a land of opportunity for all citizens.

  • 3
    1

    I admire the courage of MA Sumanthiran and Thamil Arasu Katchi in not supporting a common Tamil candidate for presidency. We all know that Tamils have previously shown solidarity by supporting Maithri for President in the last and Fonseka in the previous elections with no outcome to solve the issues associated with extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances of Tamils and implementation of the 13th amendment for power sharing. This is not a new issue and only politician with Ranil’s blessings to help the passing of a unanimous resolution at the United Nations Human Rights Council seeking justice for Tamil issue was Hon. Mangala Samaraweera which was blocked by successive Rajapakse governments. The only politician with the backbone to even consider and implement power sharing with some limits on police power under the conducive political climate is still Ranil Wickremesinghe. In my opinion the police power should be with the central government and not the provincial council as the likely hood corruption is very high with decentralization. One of the criticisms that blocked the process is the opposition based on him being a selected but not elected president. Once again, it is time for the Tamils to elect Ranil and see if he will keep the promise.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.