1 October, 2020

Blog

I Attach Great Importance To OHCHR Probe On SL: New UN Human Rights Chief

Despite the governmnet of Sri Lanka believing that the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) stance on the war crimes allegations on Sri Lanka would change following the new UN Human Rights Chief Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein taking over the reins, he has stated that he attaches great importance to the investigation on Sri Lanka.

Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein

Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein

In the opening statement he is due to make at the 27th session of the UNHRC on September 8, he has asserted that he encourages Sri Lankan authorities to cooperate with the probe on Sri Lanka led by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) in the interests of jusice and accountability.

He has also expressed concern over the threats that are currently being levelled against the human rights community in Sri Lanka as well as on the prospective victim and witnesses.

Furthermore in his opening statement in reference to Sri Lanka, he has also deplored the recent incitement and violence against the Muslims and Christian minorities in the country.

Meanwhile, an oral update on the OHCHR investigation on Sri Lanka has been scheduled to be presented before the Council at the 27th sessions that are due to comence on Monday.

We publish below the statement due to make in full;

Civil Society Section

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights

 

United Nations Human Rights Council

27th Session

Opening Statement by

Mr. Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein

United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights

Geneva, 8 September 2014

 

The mandate of my Office encompasses all human rights, for all people. Its priorities span discrimination; the rule of law and ending impunity; poverty; violence; continuing efforts to improve international human rights mechanisms; and widening the democratic space. In recent months, OHCHR’s concerns have been numerous. They have included severe acts of discrimination in many regions; widespread violations of economic and social rights due to failures of governance and other concerns; apparent violations of human rights in the context of counter-terrorism; sexual violence; attacks motivated by stereotypes and hatred of many kinds; over-incarceration; the death penalty, and many other issues.But my first address to this Council takes place at a time when conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa regions, in particular, are escalating dramatically. In Syria, more than 190,000 identified persons were killed between March 2011 and April this year, according to an analysis released by OHCHR last month. According to UNHCR, more than 3 million Syrians have fled their country and 6.5 million more are internally displaced: in other words, almost half the people in Syria have fled their homes. Those wounded, orphaned, missing, detained, “disappeared”, displaced, malnourished, deprived of healthcare and denied other critical services add to the incalculable human cost of this conflict.

The latest report by the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic brings fresh evidence that this ancient civilisation has devolved into a slaughterhouse, where children are tortured in front of their parents or executed in public, amid wanton killing and destruction. That report will be fully explored in the course of an interactive dialogue during this session.

Spreading outwards from its initial anchorage in the chaos of the Syrian conflict, the Takfiri or so-called ISIL group that currently in effect controls large swathes of northern Iraq has demonstrated absolute and deliberate disregard for human rights. The scale of its use of brute violence against ethnic and religious groups is unprecedented in recent times, as the Special Session of this Council made clear last week.

I solemnly remind this Council that widespread or systematic attacks on segments of the civilian population because of their ethnic background or religious beliefs may constitute a crime against humanity, for which those responsible must be held accountable. I would also like to stress that international law requires that both the State and armed groups take all measures to minimise the impact of violence on civilians, respect the principles of distinction and proportionality when carrying out military operations, and ensure that civilians can leave areas affected by violence in safety and dignity.

From a human rights perspective, it is clear that the immediate and urgent priority of the international community should be to halt the increasingly conjoined conflicts in Iraq and Syria. In particular, dedicated efforts are urgently needed to protect religious and ethnic groups, children – who are at risk of forcible recruitment and sexual violence – and women, who have been the targets of severe restrictions.

The second step, as my predecessor consistently stressed, must be to ensure accountability for gross violations of human rights and other international crimes. Impunity can only lead to further conflict and abuses, as revenge festers and the wrong lessons are learned. Accountability, and public acknowledgment of the wrongs that victims have suffered, is important to ensuring that crimes will not be repeated, and the only way to begin to repair a sense of common community in these devastated societies. Iraq, with its new prime minister, should consider accession to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

The third task – and despite the international community’s failure to ensure the first two, I do not believe it is too early to envisage this – must be to take a step back and look at how and why these crises erupted. Underlying patterns of violations and discrimination, including corrupt and discriminatory political systems that disenfranchised large parts of the population, created an inflammable backdrop. Leaders who oppressed or violently attacked independent actors of civil society; institutions that failed to include broadly inclusive participatory processes; a comprehensive failure to promote and protect economic and social rights, as well as civil and political rights – such factors, alongside years of conflict, discouraged the development of tolerant and moderate civil society movements, while the only dissident groups that did flourish underground were extremist ones.

Another example of the need to end persistent discrimination and impunity is the Israel-Palestine conflict, with the recurring violence and destruction evident in the repetition of crises in Gaza. The most recent outbreak of armed conflict has had a particularly devastating toll in death, suffering and destruction, compounding what was an already precarious situation due to the blockade imposed by Israel in 2007. As of last week, preliminary estimates are that 2,131 Palestinians had been killed during the latest crisis in Gaza, including 1,473 civilians, 501 of them children. 71 Israelis had also been killed, including 4 civilians.

Current and future generations of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, have a right to live normal lives in dignity: without conflict, without a blockade, indeed without the wide range of daily human rights infringements that are generated by military occupation, illegal settlements, excessive use of force, home demolitions, and the Wall that continues to be constructed across the Occupied Palestinian Territory. The seven-year blockade must end, and there must be effective accountability for transgressions committed by all parties. On this point, I note that Israelis have a right to live free and secure from indiscriminate rocket fire.

I trust that this Council’s Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory will be able to acquit its task of creating clarity about facts with full engagement from both sides. It is also imperative that all parties to the conflict in Gaza fully comply with their obligations under international humanitarian law.

Since this Council last convened, the situation in Libya has deteriorated very rapidly, and represents a growing threat to regional security. Multiple armed groups are indiscriminately shelling heavily populated areas through the use of heavy artillery and even aircraft, leading to the death and injury of civilians, including children. Living conditions for civilians in Tripoli and Benghazi have steadily deteriorated, with food, fuel and electricity in diminishing supply. Health facilities have been severely affected by the violence, and common criminality is on the rise. I urge the parties involved in these hostilities to cease all violations of international law and end the fighting.

We remain concerned about the situation in Ukraine. OHCHR’s latest monthly report gives a full picture of current human rights challenges, especially in the east, where at least 3000 people have been killed since mid- April this year. The Council will specifically deal with this situation later in the session, and an official OHCHR report will be presented at that time. I must, however, reiterate that every effort must be made by both the Ukrainian government and the armed groups – as well as by neighbouring States, including the Russian Federation – to protect civilians in this deplorable conflict, and to ensure the application of international humanitarian law.

In the Central African Republic, a near-total absence of State control over most parts of the country continues to facilitate impunity for violations. Ex-Séléka and anti-Balaka forces continue their attacks, with the civilian population the main victims. The international Commission of Inquiry on CAR has already concluded that there are reasonable grounds to believe that all sides of the conflict have perpetrated serious violations of international humanitarian and human rights law since January 2013. In its second phase, the Commission will carry out investigations beyond Bangui. 68 OHCHR staff members will participate in the Human Rights Component of the UN peacekeeping mission, a further indication of how the Rights Up Front agenda is taking shape.

In South Sudan, despite a recent lull in fighting, we have continued to observe serious human rights violations by both parties to the conflict. There will be detailed discussion of this situation during a panel discussion on 24 September. Regarding the Democratic Republic of Congo, I was appalled to learn recently that more than one in three men surveyed in the North Kivu province admitted that he had committed sexual assault. I have been tremendously inspired by the work of Dr. Denis Mukwege, who has noted how “the bodies of women became the battlefield of conflict” in the DRC. This underscores the need for the Government to implement recommendations regarding women’s human rights and preventing sexual violence. A report on the DRC will also be presented at this session of the Council.

May I say also that I have been deeply impressed by the work of this Council’s Commission of Inquiry on human rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. I hope the General Assembly and Security Council will give this report their fullest attention, and take steps to ensure accountability for those who have perpetrated crimes against humanity.

Moreover, I attach great importance to the investigation on Sri Lanka mandated by this Council, on which OHCHR will report later in the session. I encourage the Sri Lankan authorities to cooperate with this process in the interests of justice and reconciliation. I am alarmed at threats currently being levelled against the human rights community in Sri Lanka, as well as prospective victims and witnesses. I also deplore recent incitement and violence against the country’s Muslim and Christian minorities.

Excellencies,

In the resonant words of the Preamble to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, “Recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.” Societies that uphold human rights are more resilient, more sustainable and thus more secure. In raising an independent voice that can advocate for the voiceless, in identifying violations and gaps in States’ protection, and assisting with technical capacity building, OHCHR is, in a very real sense, working to benefit all Member States.

I am determined to further strengthen that highly constructive engagement with Member States on both bilateral and multilateral human rights issues, and I encourage Member States to propose new methods of engagement, including transparent and cross-regional gatherings in informal settings. In strengthening their national human rights capacities and infrastructures, I will count on our close cooperation and partnership with UN Country Teams worldwide, as well as regional human rights mechanisms, bilateral donors and other stakeholders active at country level, particularly national human rights institutions.

OHCHR’s mandate is to ensure that universal human rights norms are upheld, making no distinction between countries, and dealing impartially and forcefully with all civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights. Those universal norms are further clarified thanks to the persistent work of the independent, expert-led human rights mechanisms. As the custodians of human rights norms, theTreaty Bodies are uniquely qualified to grapple with challenging issues; the Special Rapporteurs are the eyes and ears of this Council. Both are practical sources of expert guidance for national policies, laws and practice, while the Universal Periodic Review is an unprecedented tool to maintain a constant review of human rights developments in all member States.

Like my predecessors, I will give utmost importance to the findings of all these human rights mechanisms. I will seek to ensure that greater priority is given to implementation of recommendations made by the UPR, the Treaty Bodies and Special Procedures, for real impact on human rights on the ground. I will also be focusing on working with my United Nations counterparts for greater integration of these recommendations into their country programmes. Regarding resolution 68/268 on Treaty Body strengthening, the past six months have seen significant follow-up to this landmark document, and I will pay careful attention to its implementation by States and by the Treaty Bodies themselves.

But the work done by OHCHR, by the Special Procedures, by Treaty Bodies, this Council itself, and indeed, by Member States, could never be achieved without the greater efforts of civil society actors. We need their continuing support and contributions to realise progress. I encourage the Council to strengthen its constructive engagement with civil society actors, and to ensure that their voices can be raised safely and without reprisals. 

Freedoms of expression, association and peaceful assembly are rights that enable people to share ideas, form new thinking, and join together with others to claim their rights. It is through the exercise of these public freedoms that we make informed, considered and intelligent decisions about our development. To restrict them undermines progress. We must acknowledge the value of civic contribution, build the capacity of marginalised voices, ensure a place at the table for civil society actors, and safeguard their activities – including the activities of those who cooperate with this Council, its Special Procedures and Commissions of Inquiry. I take this opportunity to echo the Secretary-General’s condemnation of acts of reprisal against individuals by reason of their engagement with the United Nations.

Excellencies,

In a year from now, the Sustainable Development Goals will replace the Millennium Development Goals. The SDGs will be negotiated over the coming twelve months, and have the potential to transform the very notion of development.

The MDGs popularized the powerful message that development is more than free markets and economic growth. It is about how healthy people are, what kind of education they enjoy, whether they have access to food and live in a healthy environment. However, the MDGs were blind to inequity and incomplete: it has become clear that the new goals must integrate the human rights agenda, including the right to development across the board.

The enduring effects of the global economic crisis have challenged the realization of economic and social rights. They have exacerbated inequalities and deprived many of jobs, adequate health care, education, social protection programmes, housing, clean water and food. The impact of the crisis and austerity measures has been particularly acute for the most vulnerable and marginalized in society.

The SDGs need to aim not only for freedom from want – including the rights to health, education, decent work, food, water and sanitation – but equally, freedom from fear; and here I would highlight rights relating to access to justice, personal security and an equal voice and right to participate in public affairs. Perhaps no recent phenomenon could illustrate the indivisibility and interrelatedness of human rights better than the Ebola outbreak that is currently affecting several West African countries. The lack of adequate infrastructure for a life of dignity – including hospitals and sanitation – and conditions leading to distrust and civil disengagement with authorities, have compounded the effects of this terrible epidemic, placing human lives in grave danger as well as undermining peace and security, and development.

Discrimination and inequalities of all kinds prevent people from achieving their full potential, and the SDGs must aim to overcome them. We also need a renewed global partnership to create an enabling environment for the right to development – not only through international aid and technology transfer, but also by reducing existing inequities in global governance, and by aligning trade, finance and investment policy explicitly and systematically with human rights standards and principles.

Finally, the goals will only make a difference to people if progress can be effectively monitored – and if decision-makers can be held to account for shortcomings. An important effort needs to be made to construct an accountability framework for the SDGs, with indicators that can measure the actions and omissions of private business and public authorities, and flag where implementation is faltering. Clearly, this accountability framework should aim at maximum involvement by civil society and the general public.

OHCHR has been particularly concerned by the human rights situation of migrants around the world. From the Mediterranean to the Indian Ocean and the deserts of the United States of America, we continue to see countless avoidable deaths of migrants in the course of their journeys; brutal forms of human trafficking; ill-treatment at borders; and prolonged detention in deplorable conditions. Many migrants, including documented migrants, also suffer forced labour or dangerous, exploitative or degrading working conditions, and these violations against migrants are frequently characterised by the victim’s inability to gain redress from State officials. .

Along the borders of Europe, including most recently in the Spanish enclave of Melilla,reports allege forced returns, pushbacks and ill treatment of migrants by security forces. Italian coastguards have assisted more than 100,000 migrants arriving by sea this year, but despite that good work, almost 1900 people have died crossing the Mediterranean, and more must be done by the EU and its member states to deal with this tragic situation.

In Gulf Cooperation Council countries, attempts to develop better governance regarding labour migration from Asia have stalled, and exploitative control over migrant workers by their employers remains the dominant model. Conditions for migrant workers in the fishing industry inThailand were recently made notorious by media reports, but that industry is not unique. I am also concerned by the shooting of Bangladeshi strawberry pickers in Greece after they had asked for months of back pay, and the acquittal of several of the farmers involved.

I must emphasise that the detention of asylum seekers and migrants should only be applied as a last resort, in exceptional circumstances, for the shortest possible duration and according to procedural safeguards. Australia‘s policy of off-shore processing for asylum seekers arriving by sea, and its interception and turning back of vessels, is leading to a chain of human rights violations, including arbitrary detention and possible torture following return to home countries. It could also lead to the resettlement of migrants in countries that are not adequately equipped. In Cyprus, migrants, including children, are routinely detained for periods that exceed 18 months, in prison-like conditions.

I am also concerned by reports of detention in the United States of America of some of the more than 50,000 unaccompanied children who have arrived there since October 2013. They have been fleeing violence and deprivation in countries such as El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras; some are as young as five years old. While the underlying causes of their flight involve poverty and inequality, the proximate trigger is their urgent fear of gang violence targeted specifically against children, as potential members of such gangs.

These root causes in the countries of origin and destination must be tackled in a concerted manner, at the regional level. Furthermore, the abuses suffered by these children in transit – including killings, kidnappings, disappearance, extortion, sexual violence and detention – are shocking and must be addressed. The impunity enjoyed, at every step of the journey, by those who profit from smuggling these children is unacceptable.

The treatment of non-nationals must observe the minimum standards set by international law. Human rights are not reserved for citizens only, or for people with visas. They are the inalienable rights of every individual, regardless of his or her location and migration status. A tendency to promote law enforcement and security paradigms at the expense of human rights frameworks dehumanises irregular migrants, enabling a climate of violence against them and further depriving them of the full protection of the law.

Mr. President,

The extraordinary range and significance of the topics that I have just outlined underscore the breadth of OHCHR’s mandate and the importance of the work done by its staff – often in very difficult circumstances, particularly in a number of our field offices. In the years to come I look forward to enriching the deeply valuable relationship between OHCHR and this Council. My Office will be open to dialogue with all stakeholders; and within the limits of our resources, we will extend every possible assistance to States, to heighten their protection and promotion of human rights.

Thank you.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 16
    6

    Oh no, what will our online patriots like Siva sharma and Ram and eusense…etc say to this?

    • 7
      1

      Like his predecessor he has more than he can chew and insurmountable obstacles.
      Case in point. 1972 East Pakistanis were in the same position as JT’s nothing was possible. Then one day when the Chinese and Americans were preoccupied with major issues and USSR (defence treaty with India was on then) was free, Indira decided to rescue the East Pakistanis. 8 days and the rescue was complete but the Hindian wanted to stay so Mujbir screamed and cried Allah gave us freedom and then Kissinger threatened Indira sending the 7th fleet from its dockyard in Japan.
      So the East Pakistanis got their freedom and called it Bangladesh but two women are still fighting and only stupid’s rats can enter that quarrel.
      The issue in Greece last year with the Bengalis is common feature in southern Europe (generally the fruit pluckers are from north Africa and they come in gangs with knives so there is a fear but the blacks are timid). In Barcelona back in the late 90’s they were beaten up because they were illegal pavement hawkers selling items at ¼ the price making it impossible for the tax paying traders to make a living. They lived there by renting a 2 bed for a dozen and putting pressure on services. Same time there was Romanian illegals in Germany sleeping and having open sex on stair landings and as usual the press intervened when the riots erupted. Same with the case of Gypsies- it’s called cultural shock for the natives of the land.
      Remember just a week ago NaMo has signed a defence treaty with Japan and he is urging other ASEAN nations to face the Chinese military threat.- Vietnamese still have running export orders (engineering stuff)to China yet the country is ready to fight China alongside India but for how long- until the drilling is over???

      • 2
        6

        Javi the Jihadist,

        What happened to your antics and lines and circles and bits and pieces of nonsense?

        [Edited out]

        • 4
          1

          jaffna tam`ills devils advocate in one word you are not upward compatible with modern day script.Bill Gates changed the way humans think.
          Who gave him that breakthrough? Not the foundation ivy league professors but `hippies` who were prepared to experiment. Same story with Mark Zuckerberg and networking.
          keep rubbing that hand which cleans your (@). Phew quite a smell.!
          emoji

    • 5
      6

      Not to worry,
      Sa Ra ma, no eu sense, JA K ASs Sumane, et el must wait till the F king Nominate Modawansa and Gandassara and DOc TOOR Kudu Wermin silava as Adviser to U N Human Rights Council from land of AAAASCHRAYA.
      as they are the advisers to F KING and think, know how to question, answer and reply.
      because Those Frogs in the well think that they Know every things, they are great Buddhists in this universe, Fighters of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
      preaching more than the lord Buddha preached,
      Purist humanistic Buddhists. more than the Great teacher Lord Buddha.

      • 4
        3

        JA,
        Why waste your time?

    • 4
      6

      Want to hear?

      This response is not unexpected at all. This khunt was given the UNHRC job because he is half-British, Britsh educated and is part of the Zionist driven royal house of Jordan.

      What more can you expect from a cad?

    • 5
      7

      RR
      Don’t take this Arab seriously. That is how all new appointees talk. First, he passingly mention about Sri Lanka. What else can he say? Basically he is begging to let them in as he has no other options. What do you think Israel will do? Let the UN in??
      I am all OK for this UN investigation but first UK, US and Israel has to be investigated for their war crime in Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine. Being an intelligent person, I am sure you will totally agree with me.

    • 4
      1

      Robert.R

      “what will our online patriots like Siva sharma and Ram and eusense…etc say to this?”

      As usual, they will blab.

  • 33
    8

    I will tell you what our MARA mouthpieces are going to say.
    Pillay was a Tamil and now Prince is a Muslim and they will keep saying that till Ponnasara will be appointed as the Human Rights Officer of the UN.Then there will be justice just the way it hapenned in Aluthgama and Beruwela.

    ABASARANAI.

    • 7
      5

      Ansar, hey you couldn’t have said it better. It is true, they will be pushed from one stumbling block into another whilst groping in the dark, until they have no way out but to put forward their own home grown solution, to prop-up their own ‘learned’ bigot at the helm of the UNHRC. This would truly make them the laughing stock of the entire world body.

    • 5
      3

      Best comment so far !

      • 5
        8

        yako, low intelligence??

        • 1
          3

          don’t think that others are like you

    • 3
      10

      Ansa,
      You are off the track. The issue is UK, US and Israel has to be investigated before the UN investigate SL. I would support anybody who take this path. Why not you?

  • 7
    22

    I knew that he is a Tiger or at least a Tiger supporter. The very fact that he works in the Human Rights field tells it all. Why can’t he understand that Rajapakse brothers follow a democratic system of government with the help of ministers, judges and the military. He must respect our sovereignty and let us get on with marginalising any community that opposes military occupation of north and south.

  • 10
    7

    Oh no!

    The Rajapassas are doomed.

    It won’t belong before the regime digs up some dirt on him.

    • 2
      4

      How come he is an associate of Shill Sharma the Chancellor of Belfast University. Don’t forget the `WASP`

  • 3
    1

    GOOD LUCK AWAITS FOR FISAR MUSTAABA OR HIS FATHER EITHER OF THEM WILL BE MADE SPECIAL REP AT UNHCR VERY SOON.MUSTAABA MUSTAABA DONT WORRY MUSTAABA.RJAPAKSA APPE YAALUAWA APPE YALUWAA-JARAWEWA

  • 4
    5

    SL President has said the UVA election is already a forgone conclusion.

    And advised the Opposition to start telling the Truth to the inhabitants.

    He went further to say that Opposition may even get a chance to get in to power in the future when the inhabitants start to believe that they are hearing the truth.

    See how much help and support Mr Hussain’s predecessor has given the SL Govt and its President.

    Mr Hussain should keep up her good work at least until the next Prez election.

    Because the inhabitants need another 6 years from their beloved leader Rajapaksa to keep the peace and harmony the same way as he has done from Nanthikadal to date and deliver them a real Mid income Nation.

    This become even more and more important , when our inhabitants watch or hear what Mr Hussain’s predecessor’s supporters have done and still doing to countries abutting Jordanian border.

  • 6
    5

    Our stupid ‘patriots’ here must have hoped against hope that the new UNHR Chief would be a Sharma of Commonwealth fame!

  • 5
    4

    The latest news is that Mervyn Silva has been appointed as President Rajapaksa’s new envoy to the Human Rights Council in Geneva.

    When he meets the new High Commissioner, he has questions to ask.

    “Machchan, Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, have you got any sisters? So that I can marry all of them or at least one to teach you about Buddhism and democracy in Sri Lanka.

    I love Jordanian girls but not Muslims and those who accuse our government.

    Machchan, Zeid, can you allow me to give a lecture about Rajapaksa’s democracy in the human rights council. Your human rights ordinance should know how to kidnape, hijack, kill and rape school children.

    Machchan, as I was in hurry to come to Geneva, I forgot to bring some strings rope with me. Otherwise I would have tied you to one of the pillars in the UN building and allow comrades from our supporting countries from China, Iran, Cuba, to teach a lesson at the beginning itself.

    Manchchan Zeid, tomorrow, I can’t meet you because it is Poya, but I will be busy punishing some Lankans in Geneva who do not kill, kidnape, hijack and rape children. Also I must meet some women to break their legs, so they won’t be able come back and trouble my cousin Rajapakasa.

    Anyhow meet me in our Buddhist Temple in Geneva, with some of your beautiful Jordanian girls.

  • 8
    4

    Frankly speaking, tamils are very good people,majority never go to unwnted fight. If i fight with someone at school, i will get beeting at home even if i am right.If you hit again and again someone, even a very pieceful pet cat will bite you at the end. All tamils wanted is to lead a piecefull life. They never interfered with singhalese until singhala governments troubled them again and again. The first time i have crossed elephent pass is to go to peradeniya, there are so many tamils like me in north, never saw a singhalese person. Singhalese now disturbed the balance and the whole srilanka is shaking now. If you keep disturbing, the whole srilanka will break into pieces at the end- modia, modia, please do not joint the que with bangalades, pakistan, mianmar, affrica etc. The end will be only distruction not Li-Quan singhapoor.

    • 5
      4

      Senthil if possible please translate (Aathichoodi)in English and Sinhala and post, which is learnt by every Tamil at the beginning of their schooling good luck

    • 11
      1

      Yes, Singhalese and specially singalese buddist are cause of all problems. Isis said to be support by singalese buddist, globall warming cause by singalese buddist, tsunami result of singalese buddist. Tamil people saints, even Prabhakanayake is singalese buddist.

  • 3
    3

    Rajapassas will say not you too.

  • 8
    3

    Rapal Abenayaka, Malinda Seneviratna, Dr. Dayan Jayatilaka, Hudda, Elu Kolla, T. Modaya, Abhaya, Aathal Sumane, Mechanic, Nanasara, Champika Ranawaka, Udaya Gommanpila, Wimal Weerawansa, Keheliya Rambukwella, Ajith Rohana Police Spopkesperson, Ruwan Wanigasuriya Army Spokesperson and all the other 2.50 Deshapremeeyas has to find some reason to label new UN Human Rights Chief Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein also as Tiger Agent like Madam Pillay. Or else shall we say International Conspiracy is continuing?

  • 8
    4

    It is indeed shocking that he mentions Sri Lanka among 20 others in his maiden speech. I will not be surprised however if he drops tamil rights issue and starts a new investigation in to gross violation of islamist’s rights judging by his comments. It is a classic Al Hussain over Pillai matter.

  • 3
    1

    Shocking indeed , this NV or aratai or AVB rajash or Thiru have an orgasm yet

    Cheers

    Abhaya

    • 2
      1

      Abhaya

      “Shocking indeed”

      Shocking indeed, even at this grand old age you are forced to resort to manual labour.

  • 3
    1

    Well it appears as if the time is up for the RAJAPAKSES !!!!!!!!

  • 0
    1

    THE new UN Human Rights chief is aware of ongoing repression of minorities,especially tamils – latest here:-

    http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=37372

    He cannot be fooled

  • 1
    1

    Pillay is not the only one who was criticized by the Mad Hatter’s Tea Party, also known as the Government of Sri Lanka. Pillay’s predecessor, Louise Arbour, former U.N. humanitarian affairs head John Holmes, Ban Ki Moon, and so many other international high officials have been regularly castigated and publicly insulted by the regime and its hangers-on in Colombo. The list is endless. Now it will be Prince Zeil Al Hussein’s turn. But the Mad Hatters in Colombo sorely underestimates the will of the civilized world, hoping against hope that other despotic regimes like Russia and China will protect them at the expense of the life and liberty of the poor people of Sri Lanka of all ethnic and religious backgrounds. But international actions and sanctions against the regime and targeted individuals associated with the regime is only a few months away. What the famous poet Omar Khayyam wrote centuries ago is an apt verse today for the Sri Lankan regimes desperate efforts to suppress the upcoming UNHRC findings on Sri Lanka:

    The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
    Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit
    Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
    Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.

  • 0
    1

    I for one will not hold my breath for something positive to come from a UNHRC inquiry into the war crimes committed in 2009.

    The UN is a failed organisation when it comes to preventing conflict. Rwanda, the Balkans, Palestine, Sri Lanka, Myanmar ah the list goes on and on.

    Coming in after the fact is futile to say the least. Prevention means being proactive and getting involved at the very beginning, at the time when restiveness begins. No point trying to shut the gate after the horse has bolted. To me the UN is a moribund, lethargic and more of a self serving white elephant than anything else.

    No wonder the US has to take the lead in most conflicts these days sidelining the UN. Unfortunately the US acts only when its own interests are at risk or when its paymasters, the Jewish people’s interests are at risk.

  • 1
    0

    The new chief of the UNHRC hails from Jordan, and is related to the ruler. We know that the ‘activists’ who murdered 200000 Syrians over the last 3 years were trained in Jordan, with the full knowlege of the leadership of the country. They became enemies ONLY when they started to move into Iraq, and were called the ISIL/ISIS. Now they are biting the hand that fed them. Will Jordan be the next to pay the price, as evidenced by Abdulla II was pleading with NATO in Cardiff.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.