23 September, 2019

Blog

In Dealing With The Impeachment Motion

By Laksiri Fernando

Dr Laksiri Fernando

In dealing with the impeachment motion against the Chief Justice, it is correct for the opposition not to stoop into dishonourable politics as the government conducts its affairs inside and outside Parliament, on the subject, especially through the government controlled media. There are charges, unfounded or not, that need to be carefully investigated. If the Parliamentary Select Committee Investigation (PSC) becomes purely a political battle, between the government and the opposition, that is not what the constitution or the remaining democracy in this country would expect. Otherwise, the political culture of the country and the present sorry state of our many institutions would become completely irreparable.

But at the same time, there is no need for the opposition parliamentarians and others to keep completely silent on the subject, other than those who are nominated to the PSC. There are political dangers looming behind the impeachment initiative to completely scuttle the independence of the judiciary and make it an instrument of the executive. This is an extension of the 18th Amendment and the Executive Presidential System. The people in the country should be educated and we ourselves should get educated through the process. The indications so far are alarming.

According to CA Chandraprema, who perhaps reads the current ‘Mahinda Chinthana’ correctly, the “government means business.” He also adds “in Sri Lanka – every battle, whether it be with terrorists, the Supreme Court or with foreign powers have to be fought to the finish.” What is expected with the Supreme Court is apparently a Nanthikadal! These words should not be taken lightly considering what happened last Friday at the Wellikada remand prison; 27 dead. His suggestions on Supreme Court reforms are more dramatic than his political rhetoric.

“Shirani Bandaranayake made history by being the first woman Supreme Court judge and the first woman chief justice. She is about to make history again and how! What this shows is that no one should be appointed to a body like the Supreme Court and holds that position for more than five years. Shirani Bandaranayake has already been on the Supreme Court bench for far too long. Furthermore a position on the SC should be offered only to those with long years of experience at the bar or the bench and should not remain either as a Supreme Court judge or the chief justice for anything more than five years.”

Apart from the obvious contradiction between “long years of experience” for appointment and not “more than five years” to hold office in the Supreme Court, the suggestion is a clear prescription for complete politicisation of the Supreme Court, let alone the judiciary in general. It is almost a universally accepted democratic principle today that what is of paramount importance is the independence of the judiciary. That is why a life tenure or tenure until retirement is prescribed. Impeachment is a device to correct any adverse consequence in the process due to ‘misbehaviour or incapacity.’ In some countries ‘crimes’ or ‘treason’ are the terms used and in fact requires a two-thirds majority to pass an impeachment motion after independent judicial inquiry.

There is no question that the present Chief Justice had compromised her position by allowing her husband to accept and hold government appointments in the past, not one but several. But the main culprit in this predicament is the government itself. That kind of an appointment for a spouse of a Chief Justice or a Supreme Court Judge could be made only by a government which doesn’t believe in the independence of the judiciary. ‘Real politic’ is not an excuse. There should be proper rules for government appointments, without making them merely political. Perhaps the appointment of the husband was done purposely as bait and to keep her position compromised as much as possible. In my opinion, at least now the Chief Justice should admit this mistake openly. Or her husband can make a public statement without implicating of course the ongoing bribery inquiries against him.

When the bribery charges were raised against her husband, whether he is innocent or not, the Chief Justice could have gracefully resigned, because the first mistake was already committed. That was unfortunately not done. These and related matters were raised impartially by Uvindu  Kurukulasuriya before. Holding onto positions some way or the other whether politicians, government officials, academics or judicial officers is not a good practice for democracy and transparency or as a personal principle. It is my personal impression that the bribery charges are vindictively framed up. I may be wrong. The courts have no option but inquire. Only the Chairman of the NSB cannot be responsible when there is a Board of Management collectively responsible. And my experience as a Director at the Colombo Stock Exchange (CSE), reminds me that these kinds of large scale share transactions cannot happen without the government approval or prompting. All these are closely monitored and even manipulated. However, if something goes wrong, then they find scapegoats and in this case it is more than a scapegoat. This is a punishment mainly for the spouse going out of line of the government policy.

This is a good lesson for those who ask, accept and hold government appointed positions. Some are my friends. I have luckily escaped the predicament. Under normal circumstances, these are perfectly normal appointments and a way of contributing to the national development. But we don’t seem to live under normal circumstances. The government is suffering from the Nanthikadal mentality. The government appears to keep a close tab on every important and vulnerable person in the public service and the judiciary. Foreign Service is not spared. The government or actually the ruling circle would give enough rope to deviate from normal practices. Their instructions over the phone would not be reliable. Then they will hound behind you if you fall out of line. Financial embezzlement is the most effective charge to destroy a person’s credibility, whether proven or not.

Luckily for the Chief Justice, she can go before a Parliamentary Select Committee and the best strategy would be to place everything openly and frankly before the Committee, including any mistake in the past. The public would particularly like to know the political pressures coming from high offices on the functions of the Judicial Services Commission.

The charges against her, in my opinion, are not carefully formulated: some are frivolous and some are simply vindictive. There so many inaccuracies. She has already answered through her lawyers the charges against her bank accounts and financial matters. Many have commented on other charges and the political motives behind the impeachment are too naked. However, the impeachment procedure in Sri Lanka is flawed. It is simply incorrect for a simple majority of Parliament to impeach a higher judicial officer, while this is not particularly the case for the President. The composition of the PSC is lopsided and the procedure unclear. It would be a struggle for the opposition to try and rectify these matters.

There is no reason for her to resign now, however. Her integrity in respect of the Supreme Court decisions remains intact and those have never been unilateral decisions. While it is her responsibility to defend herself in respect of the specific charges with courage and confidence, it is up to the Opposition to defend the Independence of the Judiciary. What is at stake most is the independence of the judiciary. This is also the task of the Sri Lanka Bar Association and the civil society. The politicization of the judiciary should be prevented from all sides. The integrity of the position is already damaged by the last two chief justices, one becoming an advisor to the President and the other becoming an associate of an opposition politician. Compared to those two, the present CJ appears to belong to a rare species. The judicial officers should refrain from politics, in office and even after.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    0

    Excellent article highlighting the failure of Ranil W to focus on the main issue at hand and develop a strategy to fight the impeachment motion that endangers the judiciary- in the court of public opinion by EDUCATING the people on the dangers this represents. Ranil is too busy dividing his party to remain as the most illegitimate and despised leader that the UNP has every had, instead!
    with a few omissions:
    Shiranee banadaranayake has clearly been through a learning curve. She pandered to the Rajapassa regime and passed the 18the Amendment for perks her husband got.
    However, she seems to have learned a lesson rather late in the day and should be supported now because the struggle is not just about her but justice in the entire country at this time!

  • 0
    0

    there should be a transparency for each/ any dealing done by the government and affiliated associations or cooperations.
    because the funds are used or to be used belongs to the people and not to waste as any body’s dowry money or property. to do spend on gala parties, forigen travels with
    with their families [ legal and illegal] or car races looters [donkey’s] .
    whether they are Presidents, politicians, government officials, academics or judicial officers they have to answerable to people of this country.

    not to the piggery of Diyawannaoya or piglets of rulers.

    IS IT HAPPENING IN SO CALLED WONDERLAND?.

  • 0
    0

    Laksiri should be be congratulated on the excellent treatise on such a complicated matter. It is clear that Shirani was unenviably living under the cloud of being blackmailed the very day of her appointment because of her husband’s percieved misdemeanours. Very unfortunate indeed.
    Subra

  • 0
    0

    Spouse was appointed by no other than the President himself. Was the President not aware of the implications or was this simply a snare or bait. Hope all the details of this share transaction are revealed in course of time.

  • 0
    0

    Chandraperuma is carping about the long shelf life of the CJ. He sees five years as the maximum term a CJ should be allowed to serve in that august office.

    I wonder what term he would like a person to occupy the office of President, before he is put out to pasture? People who are bothered by how long the CJ will serve in office before retirement do not exhibit a similar concern about the period that a President has been allowed to occupy his office.

    • 0
      0

      You seem to be ignorant of some basic principles of office. The President is elected by the people and has to face the very people periodically to get re-elected. The CJ is a parasite appointed by the President, and then try to work against the constitution. Once Sarath Silva did and now this woman is doing. After the allegations against her husband was brought before the court CJ should have steped down in the name of independence of judiciary.

  • 0
    0

    Why MR appointed Pradeep? MR should bring to the select committee

  • 0
    0

    I think the way this trial is heading, which is more exposed and transparent to public, the chances of favoring any party will be difficult. Both People and the international community are watching and will decide the outcome based on the justice of the verdict. Going to be interesting and exciting.

  • 0
    0

    Anybody making a comment or oppose the government can get a visa to visit the USA or any western country. Some are making noise only for this reason, not for any justice. Who is CJ, she is a appointtee of the president who was criticized by the oppositon. After all this CJ has never spent a day in court, but got the opportunity to preside in the Supreme court.

  • 0
    0

    The CJ and other judges involved must explain their reasons for approving the 18th amendment as an “urgent bill”.
    The 18th amendment has created a virtual dictater to run the country.
    All justices who approved the bill are guilty of knowingly handing over the country to a family group to administer.
    This has bonded unborn generations to exist in a totalitarin regime.
    If they cannot explain,they must resign.
    We need a CJ and Justices who can recognise injustice and kill it in time.

  • 0
    0

    The billions of Chinese and Indians are moving forward, but the Sri Lankans are still fighting since 1948. You all are shame for the 21st century humanity. Currently the country is not heading in the right direction. I urge the Sinhalese to steer the country into the right path. The Sri Lankans have removed unelected terrorists, now they have to remove the elected terrorists. The Sinhalese have enough intellectuals to accomplish this task. However, the Tamil political leadership have removed by the Indians through the Tamil armed groups to accomplish India’s interests. Today the Tamil leaders are under the grip of the Indians and Westerners. It is a real disaster for the Tamils and Sri Lanka. I urge the Tamils to build their political leadership who can think on their own. The government must help the Tamils to build the Tamil leadership or disaster will carry-on forever. At the moment the government is enjoying the Tamils weakness, but in the long term it will work against the whole country, and put all the Sr Lankans behind the other Asians. There is a huge possibility for Sri Lanka to become the hell of Asia.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.