10 December, 2018

Blog

The Threat Facing The Country Due To The Geneva Resolution

By Mahinda Rajapaksa

Mahinda Rajapaksa

Mahinda Rajapaksa

I address you thus, at a time of great peril to our nation. Various views have been expressed about the resolution passed against Sri Lanka in the Human Rights Council in Geneva. There was a debate in parliament about it as well. Some contentious points have been raised with regard to this resolution and as the former President and Commander in Chief I am duty bound to explain to the public my views on this resolution. The people of this country should be aware of the challenge confronting the country as a result of the government co-sponsoring the Geneva resolution against Sri Lanka.

I must first draw your attention to the operative paragraphs in the Geneva resolution which will have the most serious implications for this country. There are many dangerous operative paragraphs in this resolution. I wish to draw your attention to three of the most serious and unacceptable recommendations.

According to operative paragraph 6 of the Geneva resolution the government has agreed to establish a judicial mechanism to try war crimes. They have also agreed to the participation of foreign judges, prosecutors, investigators and lawyers in that judicial mechanism. What this means in effect is the setting up of an entirely new parallel criminal justice system in this country outside the existing system.

According to operative paragraph 4 of the Geneva resolution, the Sri Lankan government has already agreed to allow these mechanisms that are to be set up to ‘deal with the past’ to obtain financial assistance from foreign countries. What this means is that the mechanisms that will be set up to look into allegations of war crimes and other matters will be paid for and maintained by the Western powers.

If the Geneva resolution is implemented, the countries that sponsored resolutions against Sri Lanka in the Human Rights Council, will be the same countries that provide funding for the judicial mechanisms set up under that resolution and who provide the judges, prosecutors, investigators and lawyers to man those mechanisms. These will also be the same countries that tried their level best to stop the final phase of the war and failed. By what stretch of the imagination are we to believe that the cause of justice will be served by such an arrangement?

The government has been putting forward various arguments to justify their decision to implement the Geneva resolution. The appointment by Mrs Sirima Bandaranaike of an Egyptian judge to the Commission of Inquiry to probe the S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike assassination is taken as an example of a foreign judge participating in the Sri Lankan judicial system.

However Mrs Bandaranaike appointed that Egyptian judge to a Commission of Inquiry appointed under the Commissions of Inquiry Act and not to a court of law. The criminal case relating to the Bandaranaike assassination was heard in the ordinary courts of the country. Similarly the instance of the Commission of Inquiry into Missing Persons (Maxwell Paranagama Commission) appointed by me, being allowed to seek the legal opinions of several foreign experts in the law of armed conflict is also mentioned as a precedent for the participation of foreign legal experts in a Sri Lankan legal process.

My government did make arrangements for the Maxwell Paranagama Commission to obtain written legal opinions from several foreign experts on a written request made by the Chairman of that Commission.  Sir Desmond de Silva QC, Sir Geoffrey Nice QC, Professor David Crane, Professor Michael Newton and Rodney Dixon – all experts in the law of armed conflict – and Major General John Holmes formerly of the British SAS provided some very valuable written opinions to the Paranagama Commission. It should be borne in mind that we are referring here not to the Maxwell Paranagama Commission Report which was tabled in parliament recently, but to the legal opinions provided to it by the foreign experts.  The government should have circulated the written opinions of these international experts to the members of the UN Human Rights Council. There was plenty of time to do so before the UNHRC sessions but the government deliberately refrained from doing so.

“The Island” web edition published all these legal opinions in full some months ago. If the contents of those well argued legal opinions had been taken into account the war crimes project against Sri Lanka orchestrated by some western countries would have come to an end before it even got off the ground.

The Commission on Missing Persons is also a commission appointed under the Commissions of Inquiry Act and not a court of law. Furthermore the legal experts I mentioned earlier, only provided written legal opinions in an advisory capacity to this commission. All these opinions were very favourable to Sri Lanka. The difference between obtaining advisory opinions about the arguments that can be made in our favour from foreign experts and appointing foreign judges to hear court cases against our war heroes should be clear to everybody.

Various views were expressed about the report of the Maxwell Paranagama Commission appointed to look into Complaints of Missing Persons during the recent debate in parliament. I heard this commission being referred to as “Rajapaksa’s Commission”. I saw some politicians trying to justify their own plans by saying that Rajapaksa’s own commission had made such and such recommendation. I appointed the Paranagama Commission to look into Complaints of Missing Persons in August 2013. After January this year it has functioned under the present government. It is now a commission of the present government. From January this year the incumbent President had the power to make any changes he wanted in the functions of this Commission. So it is not correct to say that was a ‘Rajapaksa commission’. In any event what is of importance to us here are the implications of the Geneva resolution.

The involvement of foreign judges, prosecutors, investigators and lawyers implies the creation of a new criminal justice system parallel to the existing one. I am totally opposed to any such arrangement.  I regard that very suggestion to be an insult to our courts system, legal profession, Attorney General’s Department and investigative bodies.

Through operative paragraph 8 of the Geneva resolution, the government has already agreed to remove from office members of the armed suspected of having committed human rights violations   through an ‘administrative process’ even if there is no evidence against him that can be placed before a court of law. Some ministers claimed in parliament  that there is no such recommendation in the Geneva resolution. I state with the utmost responsibility that operative paragraph 4 of the resolution requires exactly that and nothing else.

When the Human Rights Commissioner addressed the UNHRC on 30 September the matter on which he placed the most emphasis was the need to remove from office through an administrative process members of the armed forces suspected of having violated human rights. The government has agreed even to implement this patently unfair recommendation. If there is insufficient evidence to place before a court of law, no one can be declared a wrongdoer according to our legal system. On what principle of justice are such individuals to be removed from office through an administrative process? This is nothing but a project to persecute our war heroes.

There is another ethical issue here. This war was fought in Sri Lanka. If our war heroes are to be punished for war crimes, many things that were not crimes according to our law during the time of the war will have to be entered into our laws as crimes and given effect retroactively. Our constitution does permit retroactive legislation especially to give effect to international law in this country.

However, one of the most sacrosanct principles of criminal law is that a deed that was not a crime when it was committed should not be declared a crime through new legislation and punishment meted out retroactively. Even though the constitution allows retroactive legislation, this is never resorted to except in the most extreme circumstances.

The last time retroactive legislation was passed in was in the 1980s when SepalaEkanayake hijacked an Alitalia plane. At that time hijacking a plane was not an offence in our law. So the government at that time had to bring in retroactive legislation to make hijacking a crime and to punish Ekanayake. But there is no such issue here. If any member of the armed forces has committed murder there are laws against that in our country. Likewise if there are allegations, of torture, assault, rape or threatening of people against any member of the armed forces, all those crimes can be dealt with under our law.

If any of these crimes can be punished in our law, many would be left wondering why new criminal laws would be necessary at all. If new laws are introduced, that will be for only one purpose – to water down the evidentiary requirements and to enable the expeditious jailing of our war heroes. This is similar to wanting to remove from office through an administrative process even those members of the armed forces against whom there is no evidence, but are suspected of having violated human rights. The evidentiary rules in international war crimes tribunals have a lower benchmark than in our courts and the national legal systems of most countries. Life sentences can be handed down on little evidence.

This is one of the main reasons why the United States of America has prohibited international war crimes tribunals from ever trying any of its citizens. In 2002 the American government passed the “American Servicemen’s Protection Act” which empowers the American president to use force if necessary to obtain the release of any American citizen taken before an international war crimes tribunal. That is how the Americans protect their war veterans and other citizens. But what we see here are politicians falling over one another in their eagerness to betray our war heroes. One of the main reasons why the Americans are against any of its citizens being taken before these international war crimes tribunals is because of the glaring shortcomings in the international law relating to  war crimes and the procedures of the war crimes tribunals.

The present attempt being made in this country is to introduce these faulty laws and procedures to Sri Lanka and to jail our war heroes expeditiously. No self respecting citizen should allow this to happen. If any member of the armed forces has done anything wrong, he should be tried according to our law and only in our courts.

In ruling a country governments do come under pressure from overseas. The government of the day has to find ways and means of dealing with that. There is no need for a government if we are going to agree to everything said by other countries.

The government has co-sponsored the Geneva resolution without considering its implications and without informing parliament and appraising the people about it. If a separate criminal justice apparatus is to be set up with foreign judges, prosecutors and investigators, our ordinary law as well as the constitution itself will have to be amended. Last week in an interview with The Straits Times in Singapore, the Prime Minister had said that foreign judges will in fact be involved in war crimes trials here.

The laws will be changed in this manner for the sole purpose of punishing our war heroes. Changing the constitution itself to punish the war heroes who brought an end to terrorism which had been stalking this land for forty years and which embroiled the country in a raging internal war for 30 years is a dastardly act.  People belonging to all communities are now able to live in peace in this country because of the sacrifices made by our war heroes.

If we change the law to enable foreign judges, prosecutors and investigators to serve in our legal system, what happens after they finish jailing our war heroes? If the amendments to the law continues to remain even after jailing the war heroes, foreign judges, prosecutors, investigators and especially lawyers will continue to work in Sri Lanka and that may pose a major problem for the legal profession. There are many lawyers in parliament. I too am a lawyer.

One of the matters under discussion in this country with regard to the CEPA agreement with India was the provision made for Indian professionals of all categories including lawyers to work in Sri Lanka. If the laws are amended as envisaged to punish our war heroes, one of the unintended consequences of that will be the opening up of the Sri Lankan legal profession to foreigners even without CEPA.

If however, the law is changed only to punish our war heroes and after all the war heroes are jailed the laws are amended once again to restore the status quo ante, then it will become obvious to the people that this government amended the law only to punish our war heroes. That is not an acceptable situation at all.

The government has been engaged in an attempt to justify the position they have taken. One argument they have brought forward is that everything that is happening now had been agreed to in the joint statement made by the UN Secretary General and myself on May 23 2009. They have been misquoting the final paragraph of that joint statement to find justification for their own actions. That final paragraph went as follows: “Sri Lanka reiterated its strongest commitment to the promotion and protection of human rights, in keeping with international human rights standards and Sri Lanka’s international obligations.  The Secretary-General underlined the importance of an accountability process for addressing violations of international humanitarian and human rights law.  The Government will take measures to address those grievances.”

Joint statements contain the ideas of both parties signing it. The positions taken by Sri Lanka and the UN Secretary General are clearly stated. Sri Lanka has accepted that she is committed to upholding human rights to an international standard and we are doing that. We have a whole chapter on fundamental rights in our constitution. The UN Secretary General speaks about the need for an accountability process. We never accepted that. All that we did was to look into any grievances in that regard.

We never undertook to set up war crimes tribunals or to man them with foreign judges and prosecutors or to sack members of the armed forces who have not been proven guilty of any wrongdoing through an administrative process. As per the pledge we made we appointed the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission and the Commission to look into Complaints of Missing Persons.

These plans that are being made to persecute members of our armed forces cannot be implemented without amending the law. Parliament has the power to thwart all these plans being made to victimise our war heroes who sacrificed so much in the war against terror. I appeal to all Members of Parliament regardless of party affiliation, not to allow the passage of any legislation aimed at persecuting members of our armed forces. This is a matter that goes beyond politics and is about our country, our nation, our sovereignty and our self respect.

The people should be vigilant about what these powerful forces are trying to achieve by jailing our war heroes, sacking through an administrative process those who cannot be jailed, and breaking the back of this nation. It is my belief that we as a nation are now faced with the most perilous moment since independence in 1948. We are all duty bound to come forward on behalf of the nation at a time like this.

Victory to our country and nation!

May the blessings of the Triple Gem be upon you

*Text of a speech delivered by former President Mahinda Rajapaksa at the Abeyarama Temple in Colombo on Sunday 25 October 2015

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 13
    4

    MR sounds sooo educated now. Did he spend his time since Jan 8th going for tuition in Low and Engrish?

  • 13
    2

    Did GL Peiris write this?

  • 9
    20

    Dear Honorable Sir:

    Thank you for your words and your service to this country. I see that your enemies have stated that you have engaged in corruption and crimes against humanity. There are local laws to deal with corrution, however I see nothing in the law that requires the bare-faced insults of a former president, much less another human being.

    I am beginning to think that it would take more than the billions you have been accused of stealing to compensate for the sheer ingratitude and the humiliation that some of our Sri Lankans and the government are now subjecting yourself to. It is clear that some people hate you not because of what you are or have done but because of what they are.

    More to the point of the article – you are right about the American Service members protection act:

    If the United States of America has no respect for the ICC, then why is Sri Lanka so willingly co-sponsoring this resolution?

    “American Service-Members’ Protection Act is a United States federal law that aims “to protect United States military personnel and other elected and appointed officials of the United States government against criminal prosecution by an international criminal court to which the United States is not party.”

    -Wikipedia

    I am of the opinion that the United States and the UN are noble in their intentions but are in practice experts at hypocrisy, but I am a simple citizen of this country, perhaps you know better and tell me that this is not so.

  • 6
    21

    When the West withdraws the Hybrid Court after the mission is accomplished , there won’t be any Sinhala Buddhist Commanders in the Army , Navy or the Air Force.

    Budu Sarani Venerable Sobitha and Rathna…May you attain nibbana together with Sirisena. …

    • 12
      4

      KASmaalam K.A Sumanasekera

      ” When the West withdraws the Hybrid Court after the mission is accomplished , there won’t be any Sinhala Buddhist Commanders in the Army , Navy or the Air Force.”

      That would be fantastic.

      The state should not have recruited Sinhala/Buddhists in the first place for Sinhala/Buddhism has been a nasty little fascistic force.

      Armed forces are supposed to be secular, compassionate, serve the people, fight the foreign armed forces, …………

  • 11
    4

    He did not have the guts to come to Parliament when he was given time to speak on this issue. Now he is giving a statement written by a ghost writer. He is just a cardboard veeraya. what a shame.

  • 4
    8

    We fully agreed with your speech the New Reality of politics of Democracy and Sovereignty of Sri lanka, which is ongoing on so-called UN human rights of ‘war crime’ reports that undermined national Independent of an Island.

    There is no doubt that ongoing political maneuvering by UNP-RW and CBK & MS—- pattern of SLFP policies and agendas are towards that surrender hardly won victory of War of National salvation by under the your leadership of SLFP and their alliances in 2009 May.

    I totally rejects UN human Rights ‘war crime’ reports put forward by US initiated proposals are principally betray rights of Sri Lankan that survival of Independence and Democracy.
    It is not only that US led hegemony want fully eradiation of Singhalese race form Sri Lankan map.

    And while and established Tamil Eealm puppet regime in North part of Island for US domination in Indian Ocean. US policies of newly extended that South Asia small country like Sri lanka by bully and occupy Island for New Military base and Naval Unite in Sri lanka.

    TNA and JVP are alliance with current US policy of that re-occupation of Island. Large amount of money funded by CIA and RAW has been distributed among many political parties that including SLFP members of Parliamentarians, TNA, JVP, JHU ex-PRAR members that belongs to Dental Surgeon and NGO’s in recent time.

    This is purely act of political operations headed by local agents of UNP-Ranil W…. and MS+ CBK. The war become ‘crime’ only that country, nation and people, who fought against of US allies and their Western Imperialist cronies and theirs dominations.

    US policy of hipcoracy want fully uproot of nation independence and democracy by misusing “war crime” against Sri Lankan majority people democracy of country.

    US headed mass medias and local Times groups that through-out the world in fabricated stories against Sri Lankan political leaders by encourages by the leader of UNP-RW.

    They maneuvering state and government power to created political vacuum that allegations against progressive and democratic right thinking forces by UNP leader of Ranil W……MS and CBK!

    • 6
      1

      Nothing is going to go wrong for this country on account of this UNHRC resolution. What is important to note is that things Could have gone horribly wrong if your mottapala was still in power. This sick stupid man thinks he can get some one to ghost write this statement and use it to make up a threat to the country when the only threat to Sri Lanka was MAHINDA RAJAPAKSHE him self. The US may be hipocritical but they do NOT have any interest in this island as long as the inhabitants have enough brains to look after them selves without killing each other. No foreign government wants or supports Tamil ealam. It is dead get over it. The CIA has more important things to do than to mess with this island. The main documented incident of a foreign government giving money to a political campeign is when India gave a bag full of currency to Basil Rajapakshe with which he paid off Praba who rigged an election so that your hero could get elected president.

  • 10
    4

    Percy Rajapakse had no qualms about throwing the greatest war hero in Sri Lanka his own Army Commander then Gen Sarath Fonseka in jail for contesting against him, after a mock trial and striping him of his awards and even his pension.

    He had no worries about sacking over 40 senior Generals and officers all war heroes who participated in the war, without even an inquiry just because they worked for Gen Fonseka.

    He had no worries sacking hundreds of war heroes (soldiers) and making them kneel on the road for supporting Gen Sarath Fonseka.

    Now he is lamenting and shedding crocodile tears for an administrative inquiry and “Persecution” which has yet to take place.

    What a liar ! what hypocrisy and tyranny is this !!

  • 7
    5

    you are gone by gone retired looser. You dont have to address the NATION. You are worried about you and your family JACK ASS. LEt the current regime take care of the UN. GO to HAMBANTOTA and live like a hermit until you end up in JAIL.

  • 4
    3

    Mr. Mahindas Rajapakse: You said at the beginning of this article:- “I address you thus at a time of great peril to our nation” and continued “There was a debate in Parliament about”. You were the ex President and the “Commander-in-Chief” at that time. Now you have been sent to Parliament from Kurunegala with over 400,000 votes. Being a MP, a Prime Minister and the President, it it needless to tell you how much important to discuss these issues that concerns our country and nation in the Parliament to be heard by all and sundry. So; DID YOU PRESENT YOURSELF IN PARLIAMENT DURING THAT DEBATE and WHAT CONTRIBUTION AND GUIDANCE WERE GIVEN TO THE GOVERNMENT AND THE NATION?. In going through the address given by the Prime Minister, I notice that you have quite a lot of EXPLANATION to do and provide ANSWERS to some of the revelations made on the floor of the House. Instead of this type of letter writings, why don’t you seriously think of attending the Parliament one of these days and answer the Prime Minister and clarify certain charges leveled against you? WE AWAIT FOR THAT DAY. Please remember ABEYARAMAYA is not our Parliament where our elected representatives meet to discuss matters of National Importance. That is a TEMPLE where “DEVOTEES” go for RECLUSION.

  • 4
    2

    Did our Political Scientist Dayan wrote this for MR?
    By the way where is he hiding these days? Long time no hear…

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.