22 September, 2020

Blog

Trivialisation Of Law And Justice

By Kishali Pinto-Jayawardena –

Kishali Pinto-Jayawardena

In a piquantly provoking postscript to months of tumultuous conflict between the government and Sri Lanka’s legal community over the clearly arbitrary impeachment of the 43rd Chief Justice of Sri Lanka, legal practitioners were advised by her successor during the opening of two rural circuit courts this week, to protect the trust that the public had reposed in them.

Cooperation between judges, lawyers and public

The public, on the other hand, was advised to respect the judiciary which ‘protects their rights.’ Interestingly however, judging by news reports (see Daily Mirror, March 6th and March 8th), similar injunctions appear not to have been issued against the government which, in the current politico-legal context, exercises all powers in respect of the unfortunate citizenry, North, South and East, made helpless at its command.

Further observing that Sri Lanka could teach human rights to its Western critics, given the country’s 2500 year old tradition of human rights protections’ the 44th Chief Justice categorized judges, lawyers and clients as the ‘three pillars of the judiciary’ and warned that if cooperation was not evidenced between all three, the system would collapse.

Meanwhile, individuals were invited to address a post card to the Chief Justice in regard to grievances though it was stated that fundamental rights protections should not be invoked for ‘trivial matters’ such as for example, when ‘a teacher twisted a boy’s ear’ or when boys quarrel.

It is the government that does not respect the judiciary

Notwithstanding the zeal displayed to protect peoples’ rights, it is necessary to examine crucial aspects of these public assurances. Certainly, it is the duty of not only the people but also the government to respect the judiciary. For example, it goes without saying that a government which is seen as mocking the judgments of the superior courts would be infringing this very salutary dictum.

But as we saw, the Rajapaksa government did exactly that some months ago when it proceeded with the impeachment of Sri Lanka’s 43rd Chief Justice despite two judgments of the superior courts advising the Parliament to refrain from proceeding with the impeachment process in the context of basic rights to a fair trial being denied to that Chief Justice.

To show respect to the judiciary is a duty predominantly of the executive which controls all power in Sri Lanka. And is it not high time that time that we stopped talking of our two thousand five hundred years of history and looked at what we are now. Are we a nation that respects the Rule of Law? Do our politicians respect the law, judgments and indeed judges? Was it respect that was displayed when a female Chief Justice was brought before a parliamentary select committee and grossly humiliated? These are questions that are paramount in the minds of Sri Lankan citizens.

Carefully developed judicial norms

And at a different level, as much as the public itself must refrain from being unduly litigious, the trivialization of justice must be guarded against. The question is therefore not whether a citizen has the right to go before the Supreme Court when a teacher twists the ear of a child but whether a constitutional right has been violated which would involve an assessment of the degree of the hurt caused as well as the severity of the physical and psychological impact of such actions.

In jurisprudence carefully developed by the Supreme Court throughout the nineties, we have seen the Court sensitively responding to a child being slapped by teachers or to situations where indeed no physical action is caused at all but grave psychological harm is willfully inflicted.

As has been said with exemplary gravitas, “the test which has been applied by our Courts is that whether the attack on the victim is physical or psychological, irrespective of [that] fact, a violation of Article 11 (torture) would depend on the circumstances of each case.’(Adhikary and another v. Amarasinghe and others [2003] 1 SLR, 270). Here a husband and wife, both lawyers, were arbitrarily stopped by ministerial security on a busy Colombo road, forced to get out of their vehicle and abused while the wife was carrying their 18-month-old child.

Similarly when boys quarrel, the issue is not the quarrel itself but the equal operation of the law which needs to be ensured. The collapse of the system occurs when public confidence in equality guarantees break down. Lawyers and litigants cannot be expected to repose trust and confidence in a system which is fundamentally farcical.

No hope for justice for ordinary citizens

The trivialization of law and justice in Sri Lanka is indeed what has resulted in intensified international scrutiny. This week, the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) was informed by government representatives that no formal complaints had been lodged with government agencies in respect of over 60 percent of appeals of disappearances forwarded independently by complainants to the United Nations Working Group (UNWG) on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances, (see Colombo Gazette, March 6th 2013).

The implication therefore was that these complaints sent to the UNWG were not authentic. This is much in the same manner as when the incumbent Chief Justice in his previous avatar of legal advisor to the Cabinet stated before the UN Committee against Torture some years ago that disappeared web journalist Prageeth Ekneligoda was living in an overseas country. He then confessed later before a local judicial body that he had, in fact, no idea as to Ekneligoda’s whereabouts.

In a beautiful irony however, around about that same time that this claim was made in Geneva to the UNWG, law enforcement agencies prevented thousands of Northern based parents from travelling to Colombo to protest in respect of the unresolved disappearances of their children, in disregard of the constitutionally guaranteed right to movement.

So when the Government submits to the UNHRC that no significant proportion of the Northern disappearances had been formally reported to its agencies, it must recognize the fact that its actions leave absolutely no room for victims locally to complain and obtain redress. The question is simple; can an ordinary Tamil villager record the disappearance of his or her child at any police station in the north and east and expect to have it inquired into?

This Government must realise that its bluffing must stop, at least now.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    0

    The sad truth is the purported CJ making these utterances is an unscrupulous scoudrel not fit to hold this post. His involvement in the dockyardgate scam and illegal impeachment makes him totally unfit to hold this post. He talks about teaching the UN human rights? The devil quoting the scriptures.
    How can the Judiciary earn the respect of the people with such frauds at the helm?

  • 0
    0

    The government and the political leadership need to be blamed for the debacle. All other nations brought a second resolution as they fail to maintain the independence of the judiciary. This resolution calls for “an independent and credible international investigation into alleged violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law”. That means they get the approval to bring a procedural resolution in the U N Security Council very soon.

    This resolution also demands the government of Sri Lanka to implement the recommendations in the OHCHR report, “expeditiously and effectively implement recommendations made in the LLRC report and to take all necessary additional steps to fulfill its relevant legal obligations and commitment to initiate credible and independent actions to ensure justice, equity, accountability, including investigations of violations of international law, and reconciliation for all Sri Lankans”.
    Resolution also wants the government to provide “unfettered access to the Special Rapporteurs on independence of judges and lawyers; human rights defenders; freedom of expression.

    Recent events took place in the Island lead to complete destruction of the independence of the judiciary. The opposition and all citizens do not have any fundamental right preserved, there is no place to seek justice. These stupidities lead the opposition parties and majority Sinhalese also seeking help from the UN resolution. Now the opposition is also eagerly waiting for the UN to come and help restore the independence. There will be celebrations when the UN passes resolutions. Rights of all citizens mostly that of the majority community are severely affected, no wonder minorities feel badly affected.

  • 0
    0

    Thank you Kishali! Please keep up the good work and take care of yourself or Gota may send a white van for you as the noose around Rajapassa brothers accused of war crimes, tightens.

  • 0
    0

    With Dumindas Silva where is the justice?
    With the so called Sirisena boys where is the justice? Sirisena and his wife and this applies to so many ministers , presidents and secretaries( not civil servants) children have not been taught values. They are too busy steeling. They have no time to practice these values. They have no time to practice Buddhism they can not preach what they do not practice. rambukwella who creeps here and there , can he teach his children anything????now we here that, presidential siblings are using filth on people older to them. Fruits do not fall far from the tree.
    THEY DO. NOTKNOW, THYE CAN TAKE NOTHING WITH THEM. THEIR CHILDREN ARE GOOD FOR NOTHING UNEDUCATED BUMS. THEY WILL DESTROY. THEMSELVES!
    So how can there be justice for us, when these bums have to be saved by. Hook or by crook

  • 0
    0

    Sirisena’s son & friends have been granted “police bail” which does not exist in the Penal Code.
    The Minister of Justice ignores this ‘invention’ of the police to favour miscreants who have ‘political clout’.

  • 0
    0

    The best joke the present CJ cracked was that he is a God fearing man. If he only taps his conscience, he will know how God fearing he is for the misdeeds he has committed to save face for his master MR more than his God?

  • 0
    0

    Will the Day of Reckoning come? Or have we got to grin and bear it until Ditta Dhammavedaniya Kamma takes effect?

  • 0
    0

    I love my master soooooo much…please don’t talk about him like that :( . Everybody is hatin our love. Why are people so mean? Why? WHY? :(

  • 0
    0

    POST CARD to Mohan Peiris

    How about justice for Mr. Ekneliyagoda ? What are you going to do about it?

    • 0
      0

      Postman, sorry you have to re-direct this to God, as he only knows where Prageeth Eknaligoda is. Only ear twisting ones have to be directed to the Chief Justice.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.